Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Review ArticleSystematic Review

Pay-for-Performance in the United Kingdom: Impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework—A Systematic Review

Stephen J. Gillam, A. Niroshan Siriwardena and Nicholas Steel
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2012, 10 (5) 461-468; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1377
Stephen J. Gillam
1Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sjg67@medschl.cam.ac.uk
A. Niroshan Siriwardena
2Faculty of Health, Life & Social Sciences, University of Lincoln, England
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas Steel
3Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 10 no. 5 461-468
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1377
PubMed 
22966110

Published By 
The Annals of Family Medicine
Print ISSN 
1544-1709
Online ISSN 
1544-1717
History 
  • Received for publication December 17, 2010
  • Revision received December 16, 2011
  • Accepted for publication January 6, 2012
  • Published online September 10, 2012.

Copyright & Usage 
© 2012 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

Author Information

  1. Stephen J. Gillam, MD, FFPH, FRCP, FRCGP1⇓,
  2. A. Niroshan Siriwardena, MMedSci, PhD, FRCGP2 and
  3. Nicholas Steel, PhD, FFPH, MRCGP3
  1. 1Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
  2. 2Faculty of Health, Life & Social Sciences, University of Lincoln, England
  3. 3Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England
  1. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Stephen J. Gillam, MD, FFPH, FRCP, FRCGP, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2SR, England, UK, sjg67{at}medschl.cam.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Article usage

Article usage: September 2012 to February 2023

AbstractFullPdf
Sep 20121292440493
Oct 2012712407265
Nov 2012440275193
Dec 2012246194107
Jan 2013428163136
Feb 2013413170114
Mar 2013254143136
Apr 2013270141115
May 2013346123124
Jun 20132255772
Jul 20131005356
Aug 2013873753
Sep 2013862945
Oct 201311564103
Nov 2013735464
Dec 2013755565
Jan 2014755372
Feb 2014738164
Mar 2014101103131
Apr 20147888110
May 2014626975
Jun 2014847987
Jul 2014915672
Aug 2014878998
Sep 201410015794
Oct 20141137584
Nov 20149718171
Dec 2014755171
Jan 2015875858
Feb 20151094759
Mar 201513210785
Apr 2015187135102
May 2015158117118
Jun 201512610192
Jul 20151129762
Aug 20159910683
Sep 20157910272
Oct 201511512674
Nov 201518912579
Dec 2015839472
Jan 201611511394
Feb 201612613266
Mar 201611012368
Apr 20169815565
May 201611411767
Jun 20161088669
Jul 201611911963
Aug 2016937356
Sep 2016818134
Oct 201611712980
Nov 201612311872
Dec 20161968959
Jan 201726110037
Feb 201721524649
Mar 201713281071
Apr 201717270264
May 201738768863
Jun 201714028873
Jul 20177022538
Aug 201711722847
Sep 20178725040
Oct 201711728079
Nov 201716637374
Dec 201711734259
Jan 201810129445
Feb 201811720251
Mar 201814416868
Apr 201812718594
May 20187615942
Jun 201810017971
Jul 201810813981
Aug 201810214538
Sep 201810317193
Oct 20188615877
Nov 2018161236115
Dec 20181149297
Jan 20191246795
Feb 2019946876
Mar 201910116969
Apr 2019126304107
May 201910429177
Jun 20197434697
Jul 20199523985
Aug 20197228568
Sep 20196025977
Oct 20198214271
Nov 201996153100
Dec 2019609960
Jan 20209014353
Feb 20208111359
Mar 202010716647
Apr 202010811232
May 20206311136
Jun 2020326141
Jul 2020358132
Aug 2020317153
Sep 2020549888
Oct 2020687448
Nov 20207083119
Dec 2020616997
Jan 2021625860
Feb 2021488355
Mar 2021459458
Apr 20217595103
May 2021819375
Jun 2021418346
Jul 2021418650
Aug 2021337546
Sep 2021256547
Oct 20213412067
Nov 20214515988
Dec 2021588372
Jan 2022538051
Feb 20221212756
Mar 2022921494
Apr 2022916361
May 2022423476
Jun 20222323449
Jul 2022476252
Aug 2022285339
Sep 2022405939
Oct 2022458257
Nov 2022557144
Dec 2022697451
Jan 2023599236
Feb 2023516656

Cited By...

  • 184 Citations
  • Google Scholar
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 10 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 10 (5)
Vol. 10, Issue 5
September/October 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pay-for-Performance in the United Kingdom: Impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework—A Systematic Review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Pay-for-Performance in the United Kingdom: Impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework—A Systematic Review
Stephen J. Gillam, A. Niroshan Siriwardena, Nicholas Steel
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2012, 10 (5) 461-468; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1377

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Pay-for-Performance in the United Kingdom: Impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework—A Systematic Review
Stephen J. Gillam, A. Niroshan Siriwardena, Nicholas Steel
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2012, 10 (5) 461-468; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1377
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Equity and the funding of Primary Care Networks
  • Concordance in the recording of stroke across UK primary and secondary care datasets: a population-based cohort study
  • What drives general practitioners in the UK to improve the quality of care? A systematic literature review
  • Cautionary study on the effects of pay for performance on quality of care: a pilot randomised controlled trial using standardised patients
  • Spending and quality after three years of Medicares bundled payments for medical conditions: quasi-experimental difference-in-differences study
  • Confessions of a CQC inspector
  • Longitudinal evaluation of a countywide alternative to the Quality and Outcomes Framework in UK General Practice aimed at improving Person Centred Coordinated Care
  • Incentive schemes to increase dementia diagnoses in primary care in England: a retrospective cohort study of unintended consequences
  • Influence of financial and reputational incentives on primary care performance: a longitudinal study
  • Core Principles to Improve Primary Care Quality Management
  • Healthcare outcomes and quality in the NHS: how do we compare and how might the NHS improve?
  • How Evolving United States Payment Models Influence Primary Care and Its Impact on the Quadruple Aim
  • Paying for what matters most: the future of outcomes-based payments in healthcare
  • Payment incentives for community-based psychiatric care in Ontario, Canada
  • Competing demands and opportunities in primary care
  • Demandes concurrentielles et possibilites en soins primaires
  • The Challenges of Measuring, Improving, and Reporting Quality in Primary Care
  • Opportunities for primary care to reduce hospital admissions: a cross-sectional study of geographical variation
  • Incentives and disincentives for treating of depression and anxiety in Ontario Family Health Teams: protocol for a grounded theory study
  • After 12 years, where next for QOF?
  • Incomplete Markets and Imperfect Institutions: Some Challenges Posed by Trust for Contemporary Health Care and Health Policy
  • Perspectives on financial incentives to health service providers for increasing breast feeding and smoking quit rates during pregnancy: a mixed methods study
  • How to assess quality in primary care
  • Making sense of the shadows: priorities for creating a learning healthcare system based on routinely collected data
  • Impact of UK Primary Care Policy Reforms on Short-Stay Unplanned Hospital Admissions for Children With Primary Care-Sensitive Conditions
  • Large Performance Incentives Had The Greatest Impact On Providers Whose Quality Metrics Were Lowest At Baseline
  • Does paying for performance in primary care save lives?
  • GPs should be allowed to provide good quality patient centred care to encourage a person centred NHS
  • Effect of a national primary care pay for performance scheme on emergency hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: controlled longitudinal study
  • Quality in primary care
  • Economic inequalities in burden of illness, diagnosis and treatment of five long-term conditions in England: panel study
  • The effects of financial incentives for case finding for depression in patients with diabetes and coronary heart disease: interrupted time series analysis
  • Increased Risk of Subsequent Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using the U.K. General Practice Research Database
  • Setting performance targets in pay for performance programmes: what can we learn from QOF?
  • What happens when pay for performance stops?
  • Increasing the QOF upper payment threshold in general practices in England: impact of implementing government proposals
  • User Experience of a Centralized Hyperacute Stroke Service: A Prospective Evaluation
  • Future proofing the Quality and Outcomes Framework
  • The Quality and Outcomes Framework--where next?
  • In This Issue: Local+Familiar=Healthier
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Examining How Social Risk Factors Are Integrated Into Clinical Settings Using Existing Data: A Scoping Review
  • Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Primary Care: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review
  • Rural Patient Experiences of Accessing Care for Chronic Conditions: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies
Show more Systematic Review

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Person groups:
    • Vulnerable populations
  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • Health services
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Continuity
    • Personalized care
    • Relationship
  • Other topics:
    • Quality improvement
    • Clinical practice guidelines
    • Social / cultural context
    • Disparities in health and health care

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine