Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

The Rise of Electronic Health Record Adoption Among Family Physicians

Imam M. Xierali, Chun-Ju Hsiao, James C. Puffer, Larry A. Green, Jason C. B. Rinaldo, Andrew W. Bazemore, Mathew T. Burke and Robert L. Phillips
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2013, 11 (1) 14-19; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1461
Imam M. Xierali
1The Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC
2Department of Family Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ixierali@aamc.org
Chun-Ju Hsiao
3National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Maryland
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James C. Puffer
4The American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Larry A. Green
5Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason C. B. Rinaldo
4The American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew W. Bazemore
6The Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC
MDMPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mathew T. Burke
2Department of Family Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
7Department of Family Medicine, Medstar Franklin Square Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert L. Phillips Jr
4The American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
MDMSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    The steady rise of EHR adoption by family physicians and other physician specialties, 2001–2011.

    ABFM = American Board of Family Medicine; EHR = electronic health record; FP = family physician; NAMCS = National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

    Data Source: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; American Board of Family Medicine Diplomate Database.

  • Figure 2a
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2a

    State variations in EHR adoption among family physicians (ABFM), 2010–2011.

    ABFM = American Board of Family Medicine; EHR = electronic health record.

    Note: Number in parentheses in the legend indicates the number of states in each category.

  • Figure 2b
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2b

    State variations in EHR adoption among family physicians (NAMCS-FP), 2010–2011.

    EHR = electronic health record; FP = family physician; NAMCS = National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

    Note: Number in parentheses in the legend indicates the number of states in each category.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Comparison of Reported Adoption of EHRs by Family Physicians and Other Specialties, 2001–2011

    NAMCS-FPNAMCS-NonFPABFMNAMCS-FP vs NAMCS-NonFP P ValueNAMCS-FP vs ABFM P ValueNAMCS-NonFP vs ABFM P Value
    YearNo. (%)95% CLNo. (%)95% CLNo. (%)95% CL
    200198 (17.5)10.5 - 27.9915 (18.3)15.1-22.0––.8511––
    2002190 (20.8)15.0-28.01,043 (16.6)13.6-20.1––.1619––
    2003164 (18.2)12.3-26.1950 (17.1)13.2-21.7––.7165––
    2004144 (25.1)17.8-34.3977 (20.0)16.9-23.5––.1548––
    2005175 (24.8)17.8-33.51,106 (23.8)20.8-27.1610 (28.0)24.5-31.6.7688.3979.0525
    200619 6 ( 32.5)26.1-39.71,115 (28.6)25.0 -32.58, 263 (37.0)36.0 -38.0.2669.1979<.0001
    2007305 (39.4)33.1-46.01,438 (33.8)30.6-37.39,507 (43.1)42.1-44.0.0655.2012<.0001
    2008431 (50.0)42.5-57.41,907 (40.2)36.1-44.49,692 (49.1)48.1-50.1.0002.7359<.0001
    2009460 (57.5)52.3-62.52,186 (46.2)43.5-48.99,558 (54.4)53.4-55.4<.0001.1965<.0001
    2010925 (58.1)52.9-63.13,741 (49.3)46.8-51.82,437 (57.4)55.4-59.4<.0001.7334<.0001
    2011881 (66.4)61.3-71.03,445 (55.2)52.5-57.82,359 (67.8)65.9-69.7<.0001.5081<.0001
    • ABFM = American Board of Family Medicine; EHR = electronic health record; FP = family physician; NAMCS = National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; non-FP = all other physician specialties.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    The Rise of Electronic Health Record Adoption Among Family Physicians

    Imam M. Xierali , and colleagues

    Background Electronic health records (EHRs) are generally expected to improve the quality of health care, lower health care costs, and provide patients with more involvement in their own health care. Achieving these benefits, however, depends on clinicians' use of the technology. This study estimates uptake of EHRs by US family physicians and other outpatient doctors, and looks at EHR adoption by state.

    What This Study Found Adoption of electronic health records by family physicians has doubled since 2005, reaching 68 percent nationally in 2011. Family physicians are adopting electronic health records at a higher rate than other office-based physicians and are likely to exceed 80 percent penetration by 2013 if the current trend continues. State-level analysis, however, indicates significant variation in EHR adoption, from a low of 44 percent in North Carolina to a high of 88 percent in Hawaii, according to 1 of 2 data sets, and a low of 47 percent in North Dakota and a high of 95 percent in Utah, according to another. These findings point to important geographical gaps that may result from significant variation in states' commitment to adopting health information technology. States with higher EHR adoption among family physicians generally have higher EHR adoption for other office-based physicians, consistent with a state-level effect.

    Implications

    • The authors call for further research and policy making to address the significant variability between states.
  • Supplemental Table

    Supplemental Table 1. State Variations in Electronic Health Record Adoptions, 2010-2011 Pool

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Adobe PDF - Xierali_Supp_Table.pdf
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 11 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 11 (1)
Vol. 11, Issue 1
January/February 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Rise of Electronic Health Record Adoption Among Family Physicians
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Rise of Electronic Health Record Adoption Among Family Physicians
Imam M. Xierali, Chun-Ju Hsiao, James C. Puffer, Larry A. Green, Jason C. B. Rinaldo, Andrew W. Bazemore, Mathew T. Burke, Robert L. Phillips
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2013, 11 (1) 14-19; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1461

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
The Rise of Electronic Health Record Adoption Among Family Physicians
Imam M. Xierali, Chun-Ju Hsiao, James C. Puffer, Larry A. Green, Jason C. B. Rinaldo, Andrew W. Bazemore, Mathew T. Burke, Robert L. Phillips
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2013, 11 (1) 14-19; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1461
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments:
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Only One Quarter of Family Physicians Are Very Satisfied with Their Electronic Health Records Platform
  • Improving Quality Improvement Capacity and Clinical Performance in Small Primary Care Practices
  • Clinical Quality Measure Exchange is Not Easy
  • National Trends in Primary Care Visit Use and Practice Capabilities, 2008-2015
  • A Randomized Trial of External Practice Support to Improve Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Primary Care
  • The American Board of Family Medicine's Data Collection Method for Tracking Their Specialty
  • Physician Multisite Practicing: Impact on Access to Care
  • Increased Health Information Technology Adoption and Use Among Small Primary Care Physician Practices Over Time: A National Cohort Study
  • The Application of Genomics in Diabetes: Barriers to Discovery and Implementation
  • Perspectives in Primary Care: A Conceptual Framework and Path for Integrating Social Determinants of Health Into Primary Care Practice
  • Physician Information Needs and Electronic Health Records (EHRs): Time to Reengineer the Clinic Note
  • Health Information Technology Needs Help from Primary Care Researchers
  • Only One Third of Family Physicians Can Estimate Their Patient Panel Size
  • Big Data In Health Care: Using Analytics To Identify And Manage High-Risk And High-Cost Patients
  • Community Size and Organization of Practice Predict Family Physician Recertification Success
  • Factors Influencing Family Physician Adoption of Electronic Health Records (EHRs)
  • In This Issue: How We Think and Feel Influences Patient Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility and Acceptability of the “About Me” Care Card as a Tool for Engaging Older Adults in Conversations About Cognitive Impairment
  • Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Primary Care and Its Patient-Level Variation: An American Family Cohort Study
  • Performance-Based Reimbursement, Illegitimate Tasks, Moral Distress, and Quality Care in Primary Care: A Mediation Model of Longitudinal Data
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
  • Other topics:
    • Health informatics
    • Organizational / practice change

Keywords

  • electronic health record
  • family physicians
  • National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey
  • American Board of Family Medicine

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine