Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Review ArticleSystematic Reviews

Experienced Continuity of Care When Patients See Multiple Clinicians: A Qualitative Metasummary

Jeannie L. Haggerty, Danièle Roberge, George K. Freeman and Christine Beaulieu
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2013, 11 (3) 262-271; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1499
Jeannie L. Haggerty
1Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Canada
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Jeannie.Haggerty@mcgill.ca
Danièle Roberge
2Département de Sciences de la santé communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George K. Freeman
3Department of Primary Care & Social Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Beaulieu
4St. Mary’s Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Ensuring continuity of care according to patients' needs: a people-centred bottom-up approach
    Sina Waibel
    Published on: 09 August 2013
  • Management and informational continuity experienced by patients
    Annette J. Berendsen
    Published on: 16 July 2013
  • Experienced continuity of care when patients see multiple conditions
    Martin Gulliford
    Published on: 21 June 2013
  • Published on: (9 August 2013)
    Page navigation anchor for Ensuring continuity of care according to patients' needs: a people-centred bottom-up approach
    Ensuring continuity of care according to patients' needs: a people-centred bottom-up approach
    • Sina Waibel, Researcher
    • Other Contributors:

    The qualitative meta-summary on continuity of care by Haggerty and colleagues provides relevant results on the patients' experiences with care received from various clinicians in a variety of contexts. Apart from their main finding that continuity is experienced as a sense of security and confidence rather than seamlessness, we would like to comment on two different but at least as relevant findings: the importance of fir...

    Show More

    The qualitative meta-summary on continuity of care by Haggerty and colleagues provides relevant results on the patients' experiences with care received from various clinicians in a variety of contexts. Apart from their main finding that continuity is experienced as a sense of security and confidence rather than seamlessness, we would like to comment on two different but at least as relevant findings: the importance of first, ensuring patient autonomy and their contribution to achieving continuity of care, and second, promoting a relationship with a single trusted health professional.

    In their article, Haggerty et al. conclude that clinicians need to build the capacity for patients to assume some agency in management through information sharing and partnership. This notion has found strong support in the literature in the last years, but also in the international health community with the re-emerging call of putting people at the centre, i.e. seeking a people-centred bottom-up approach (e.g. the Declaration of Alma Ata 1978 reflected in the new European health policy Health 2020). Nevertheless, caution should be taken that this notion of patient participation for achieving continuity of care is not misinterpreted by transferring the final responsibility to the patients, e.g. by giving them the task of information carriers or care administrators. Rather, patient autonomy should be promoted by providing them adequate information, by listening to them carefully and allowing them to make informed decisions. Furthermore, as highlighted by Haggerty and colleagues, patients are able to identify elements of discontinuity of care, e.g. insufficient communication between providers, and can provide helpful suggestions for improvement. Therefore, it is important to seek the patient's perspective when aiming at delivering people-centred care, as long as the final responsibility to find answers to and counteract discontinuity lies with the health providers.

    According to Haggerty et al.'s results and our meta-synthesis (1), the patient's perspective underlines the need to have a single trusted physician who has developed a comprehensive knowledge and helps them navigating the system. Having a trustful relationship with one individual professional (most often the primary care physician) is considered to be necessary for ensuring that care is tailored to the patient's needs as well as consistent and coordinated.

    Bibliography

    Waibel S, Henao D, Aller MB, Vargas I, Vazquez ML. What do we know about patients' perceptions of continuity of care? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2012 Feb;24:39-48.

    Competing interests: ?? None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (16 July 2013)
    Page navigation anchor for Management and informational continuity experienced by patients
    Management and informational continuity experienced by patients
    • Annette J. Berendsen, MD, PhD

    Jeannie Haggerty et al. outline in their well performed metasummary the hypotheses generated in single studies on problems patients encounter receiving care of multiple clinicians. They state that coordination may be assumed by patients and not observed.

    The assessment of management continuity from patients' perspective is difficult. Patient perceptions of inter-professional communication are affected by the appr...

    Show More

    Jeannie Haggerty et al. outline in their well performed metasummary the hypotheses generated in single studies on problems patients encounter receiving care of multiple clinicians. They state that coordination may be assumed by patients and not observed.

    The assessment of management continuity from patients' perspective is difficult. Patient perceptions of inter-professional communication are affected by the appreciation of the communicative skills of the doctors.(1) Several instruments were developed measuring continuity of care but most instruments have problems with either the number or quality of its assessed measurement properties.(2) Possibly, one of the reasons why it is difficult to develop these instruments is that each patient- doctor contact is a combination of communication and medical content. From patients' perspective discrimination between these two aspects is not possible.(1) Haggerty et al. make a valid observation that management continuity is best assessed indirectly by patients through reporting failures and gaps (discontinuity) and informational continuity directly through patients' experience. Improvement of informational continuity is necessary especially when patients are discharged from hospital care as studies from the USA (3) as well as Europe (4) showed. Of the patients from the USA 74% wanted more information. They found that communication was inadequate concerning follow-up, sources of information and to whom questions should be directed.(3) In the Netherlands patients thought it important to receive sufficient information upon discharge from the hospital, but only 84% received sufficient information.(5) All patients treated by more than one specialist felt it is important that specialists keep each other well informed. However, patients experienced this fully in only 55% of cases, in 28% to some extent and not at all in 17%. Above all patients do not want contradictory information from multiple specialists though 19% of them reported having received contradictory information.(5)

    1. Berendsen AJ, de Jong GM, Meyboom-de Jong B, Dekker JH, Schuling J. Transition of care: experiences and preferences of patients across the primary / secondary interface - a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009; 9:62.

    2. Uijen AA, Heinst CW, Schellevis FG, van den Bosch WJ, van de Laar FA, Terwee CB, Schers HJ. Measurement properties of questionnaires measuring continuity of care: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e42256.

    3. Holland DE, Mistiaen P, Bowles KH. Problems and unmet needs of patients discharged "home to self-care". Prof Case Manag. 2011; 16:240-250.

    4. Hesselink G, Flink M, Olsson M, Barach P, Dudzik-Urbaniak E, Orrego C, Toccafondi G, Kalkman C, Johnson JK, Schoonhoven L, Vernooij-Dassen M, Wollersheim H; European HANDOVER Research Collaborative. Are patients discharged with care? A qualitative study of perceptions and experiences of patients, family members and care providers. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21 Suppl 1:i39-49.

    5. Berendsen AJ, de Jong GM, Schuling J, Bosveld HE, de Waal MW, Mitchell GK, van der MK, Meyboom-de JB. Patient's need for choice and information across the interface between primary and secondary care: A survey. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 79:100-105.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (21 June 2013)
    Page navigation anchor for Experienced continuity of care when patients see multiple conditions
    Experienced continuity of care when patients see multiple conditions
    • Martin Gulliford, Professor of Public Health

    Jeannie Haggerty and colleagues provide a valuable synthesis of research concerning patients' experiences of continuity of care, when care is provided by multiple clinicians.

    The concept of continuity is of growing importance. Multi-morbidity, the co-existence of several long-term conditions, is now the rule rather than the exception among older adults. This has the consequence that individual patient's care ma...

    Show More

    Jeannie Haggerty and colleagues provide a valuable synthesis of research concerning patients' experiences of continuity of care, when care is provided by multiple clinicians.

    The concept of continuity is of growing importance. Multi-morbidity, the co-existence of several long-term conditions, is now the rule rather than the exception among older adults. This has the consequence that individual patient's care may be delivered by a range of clinicians, including both family physicians and specialists, as well as the wider members of clinical and social care teams. Haggerty et al. identify 'continuity' as an experience of 'security and confidence'. This is relevant because research shows that errors in care, and problems of patient safety, may arise when continuity is lacking, either at transitions in care, or when there are relational difficulties, or if there are problems of communication and information transfer.(1) Greater focus on interpersonal and organisational issues that promote continuity of care might enhance patient safety. Generic measures of the patient experience of continuity of care may be utilized in patients with multiple long-term conditions in order to promote safer and more acceptable care. Such measures are now being described,(2) with content that is broadly consistent with the elements outlined in the synthesis of Haggerty et al.

    References

    1: Burgess C, Cowie L, Gulliford M. Patients' perceptions of error in long-term illness care: qualitative study. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Jul;17(3):181-7. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2012.011122. PubMed PMID: 22807556.

    2: Gulliford M, Cowie L, Morgan M. Relational and management continuity survey in patients with multiple long-term conditions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Apr;16(2):67-74. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2010.010015. Epub 2010 Jun 30. PubMed PMID: 20592048.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 11 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 11 (3)
Vol. 11, Issue 3
May/June 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Experienced Continuity of Care When Patients See Multiple Clinicians: A Qualitative Metasummary
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Experienced Continuity of Care When Patients See Multiple Clinicians: A Qualitative Metasummary
Jeannie L. Haggerty, Danièle Roberge, George K. Freeman, Christine Beaulieu
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2013, 11 (3) 262-271; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1499

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Experienced Continuity of Care When Patients See Multiple Clinicians: A Qualitative Metasummary
Jeannie L. Haggerty, Danièle Roberge, George K. Freeman, Christine Beaulieu
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2013, 11 (3) 262-271; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1499
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Digital solution for salutogenic brain health: a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomised trial (SMART) protocol for clinical implementation
  • Continuity of care in a pandemic: an observational study in GP-centred healthcare in Germany
  • Improving personal continuity in general practice: a focus group study
  • Delivering relational continuity of care in UK general practice: a scoping review
  • Optimising personal continuity for older patients in general practice: a cluster randomised stepped wedge pragmatic trial
  • The Wall of Evidence for Continuity of Care: How Many More Bricks Do We Need?
  • Optimising personal continuity: a survey of GPs and older patients views
  • Optimising personal continuity: a survey of GPs and older patients views
  • Why does continuity of care with family doctors matter?: Review and qualitative synthesis of patient and physician perspectives
  • Cross-sectoral communication by bringing together patient with cancer, general practitioner and oncologist in a video-based consultation: a qualitative study of oncologists and nurse specialists perspectives
  • Continuity of Cancer Care and Collaboration Between Family Physicians and Oncologists: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
  • Discrimination and Medical Mistrust in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Sample of California Adults
  • Physical Distancing With Social Connectedness
  • Professionals perspectives on factors affecting GP trainees patient mix: results from an interview and focus group study among professionals working in Dutch general practice
  • "It's Really Overwhelming": Patient Perspectives on Care Coordination
  • Patients views on interactions with practitioners for type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal qualitative study in primary care over 10 years
  • Patients experiences with continuity of cancer care in Canada: Results from the CanIMPACT study
  • Continuity of care in primary care and association with survival in older people: a 17-year prospective cohort study
  • Transitional Care for Patients With Congestive Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • Exploring the Patient and Staff Experience With the Process of Primary Care
  • Effect of Continuity of Care on Hospital Utilization for Seniors With Multiple Medical Conditions in an Integrated Health Care System
  • A simple clinical coding strategy to improve recording of child maltreatment concerns: an audit study
  • In This Issue: Practice Change--Context Matters
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing Among Older Persons: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
  • Accuracy of Signs and Symptoms for the Diagnosis of Acute Rhinosinusitis and Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis
  • Employment Interventions in Health Settings: A Systematic Review and Synthesis
Show more Systematic Reviews

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Qualitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health services
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Continuity
    • Comprehensiveness
    • Coordination / integration of care

Keywords

  • continuity of patient care
  • primary health care
  • patient-centered care
  • quality of health care
  • patient satisfaction
  • process assessment (health care)
  • qualitative research

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine