Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
EditorialEditorials

In This Issue: Many Arrows Rather than Magic Bullets

Kurt C. Stange
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2014, 12 (3) 198-199; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1653
Kurt C. Stange
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

If we were to be reflective and honest about the pathways between medical interventions and patient outcomes, we would diagram many arrows between the intervener, the intervenee, multiple intermediate steps, and the desired (or sometimes unintended) outcomes. Each of the articles in this issue of Annals show that paying attention to these many arrows is likely to be more helpful than putting on blinders and wishing for magic bullet solutions to complex problems.

A theory-based interactive multimedia computer program designed to improve colorectal cancer screening and its sociopsychological antecedents is evaluated by Jerant et al in a clinical trial in a multiethnic sample.1 The intervention improves colorectal cancer knowledge, efficacy, readiness, the specificity of patients’ test preferences, amount of discussion and recommendation—everything except colorectal cancer screening rates. This study shows the challenges of achieving the desired outcomes even with a tailored intervention strategy, and even when all the steps in the causal chain, as is it understood, are successfully taken.

One of the many steps in implementing guidelines for statin use is identifying not only hyperlipidemia, but also cardiovascular risk. A study by Johansen and colleagues shows that undervaluation of cardiovascular risk appears to be a reason for apparent under use of statins.2 These findings are relevant to discussion about the recent American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association guidelines.3–6 This article is featured as the Annals Journal Club selection.7

Multiple facets of medication taking for coronary artery disease are examined in a systematic review and qualitative synthesis by Rashid et al.8 The study points to different arrows on the cause chain in medication adherence, from patient self-perceptions and disease understanding, to communication and relationships with clinicians, to care transitions.

A cluster randomized trial among 3 practice-based research networks teases out the individual and conjoint effects of practice facilitation and learning collaboratives, added to performance feedback and academic detailing, in helping primary care practices to implement asthma guidelines.9 The findings show the helpful effects of practice facilitation.

In addressing familial illness, knowing the family medical history is an important first step. A prospective study by Emery et al finds strong performance characteristics of a family history screening questionnaire for cancers, diabetes, and heart disease familial risk.10

An approach for contextualizing research, practice, self-care, caregiving, and policy for people living with multiple chronic conditions is elucidated in a policy article written by a diverse group of stakeholders from government and private organizations, and including patients, caregivers, researchers, clinicians, and policy makers.11

Another special article addresses the challenges of guidelines for people with multiple chronic conditions, summarizing recent policy work by the US Department of Health and Human Services and the Institute of Medicine.12

An article by Phillips et al provides a role definition for family physicians that encompasses complex tasks and meaningful relationships.13

Three essays address different aspects of the pathways between medical interventions and patient outcomes. Elwyn shows how clinicians can draw upon principles from both shared decision making and motivational interviewing to provide patient-centered care across the spectrum of health care issues.14 A heartening essay by Colgan puts a face on the “poetry of the commonplace” that sustains and nourishes a physician’s love of medicine.15

Finally, in this issue we launch a new occasional feature edited by Rob Williams. This inaugural Point / Counterpoint feature examines the question “Do clinical guidelines still make sense?” Basing their answers in part on 4 articles in this issue that examine various aspects of clinical guidelines,1,2,9,12 Upshur and Sox provide provocative new insights into when and how guidelines may be relevant to improving patient care and outcomes.16,17

We welcome your reflections at AnnFamMed.org.

  • © 2014 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jerant A,
    2. Kravitz RL,
    3. Sohler N,
    4. et al
    . Sociopsychological tailoring to address colorectal cancer screening disparities: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(3):204–214.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Johansen ME,
    2. Green LA,
    3. Sen A,
    4. Kircher S,
    5. Richardson CR
    . Cardiovascular risk and statin use in the United States. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(3):215–223.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Stone NJ,
    2. Robinson J,
    3. Lichtenstein AH,
    4. et al
    . 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Nov 7. pii: S0735-1097(13)06028-2 [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Eckel RH,
    2. Jakicic JM,
    3. Ard JD,
    4. et al
    . 2013 AHA/ACC Guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Nov 7. pii: S0735-1097(13)06029-4 [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Goff DC Jr.,
    2. Lloyd-Jones DM,
    3. Bennett G,
    4. et al
    . 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Nov 12. pii: S0735-1097(13)06031-2 [Epub ahead of print].
  4. ↵
    1. Wenger NK
    . Prevention of cardiovascular disease: highlights for the clinician of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. Clin Cardiol. 2014 Mar 14 [Epub ahead of print].
  5. ↵
    1. Stange KC
    . Diagnosis or risk factors to guide statin use. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(3):260–269.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Rashid MA,
    2. Edwards D,
    3. Walter FM,
    4. Mant J
    . Medication taking in coronary artery disease: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(3):224–232.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Mold JW,
    2. Fox C,
    3. Wisniewski A,
    4. et al
    . Implementing asthma guidelines using practice facilitation and local learning collaboratives: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(3):233–240.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Emery JD,
    2. Reid G,
    3. Prevost AT,
    4. Ravine D,
    5. Walter FM
    . Development and validation of a family history screening questionnaire in Australian primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(3):241–249.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Bayliss EA,
    2. Bonds DE,
    3. Boyd CM,
    4. et al
    . Understanding the context of health for people with multiple chronic conditions: moving from what is the matter to what matters. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(3):260–269.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Goodman RA,
    2. Boyd C,
    3. Tinetti M,
    4. Von Kohorn I,
    5. Parekh AK,
    6. McGinnis J
    . IOM and DHHS Meeting on making clinical practice guidelines appropriate for patients with multiple chronic conditions. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(3):256–259.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Phillips RL,
    2. Brundgardt S,
    3. Lesko SE,
    4. et al
    . The future role of the family physician in the United States: a rigorous exercise in definition. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(3):250–255.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Elwyn G,
    2. Dehlendorf C,
    3. Epstein RM,
    4. et al
    . Shared decision making and motivational interviewing: achieving patient-centered care across the spectrum of health care problems. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(3):270–275.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Colgan R
    . I remember…it was December. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(3):276–278.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Upshur RE
    . Do clinical guidelines still make sense? No. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(3):202–203.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Sox HC
    . Do clinical guidelines still make sense? Yes. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(3):200–201.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 12 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 12 (3)
Vol. 12, Issue 3
May/June 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In This Issue: Many Arrows Rather than Magic Bullets
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
In This Issue: Many Arrows Rather than Magic Bullets
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2014, 12 (3) 198-199; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1653

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
In This Issue: Many Arrows Rather than Magic Bullets
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2014, 12 (3) 198-199; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1653
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Recruiting, Educating, and Taking Primary Care to Rural Communities
  • Returning to a Patient-Centered Approach in the Management of Hypothyroidism
  • An Opportunity to Emphasize Equity, Social Determinants, and Prevention in Primary Care
Show more Editorials

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine