Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
NewsFamily Medicine UpdatesF

A PRESCRIPTION TO ADVOCATE FOR GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION REFORM

Michael Mazzone, Natasha Bhuyan, Gretchen M. Dickson, James W. Jarvis, Lisa Maxwell, W. Fred Miser, Karen Mitchell, Stephen Schultz, Todd Shaffer and Michael Tuggy
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2015, 13 (2) 184-185; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1771
Michael Mazzone
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natasha Bhuyan
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gretchen M. Dickson
MD, MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James W. Jarvis
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Maxwell
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Fred Miser
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen Mitchell
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Schultz
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Todd Shaffer
MD, MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Tuggy
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Training the next generation of physicians in a system wrought with funding disparities has left many residency program directors wondering if there is hope for change—and what role they might play in bringing about change.

The current state of graduate medical education (GME) financing is based on outdated statutory formulas that are focused on cost-based reimbursements in the hospital setting. The consequences of this imbalanced funding are significant: the formula impacts access to care, contributes to physician workforce shortages, and ultimately fails to meet the health care needs in the United States.

Between 1998 and 2008, there was an increase in the number of residency slots in specialties known for competitive incomes and appealing lifestyles (radiology, ophthalmology, anesthesia, and dermatology) and a decrease in primary care slots (family medicine, pediatrics, and internal medicine). Despite the increasing need for primary care physicians across the country, research indicates that hospitals largely favor higher revenue-generating specialty training, as there is a direct correlation between specialty income and GME slots offered.1

In response to the failures of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to meet the health care needs of the public, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) issued a report calling for dramatic changes in GME funding and governance.2 Specifically, the report recommends providing funding directly to sponsoring institutions, thereby promoting more training at community-based sites. In addition, the report supports the creation of an oversight council to track performance outcomes and lead policy development.

Shortly after the IOM report was released, the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) also took a stand emphasizing the need to expand primary care GME by instilling accountability in a budget-neutral manner. The AAFP proposed that CMS limit direct graduate medical education and indirect medical education payments to the training of first-certificate residency programs. They also proposed that CMS require all sponsoring institutions and teaching hospitals seeking new Medicare and/or Medicaid-financed GME positions meet minimum primary care training thresholds as a condition of their expansion. This change could fund an additional 7,000 new residency training spots with a minimum of 50% going to primary care specialties. In addition, AAFP’s proposal would require hospitals and sponsoring institutions to demonstrate a commitment to primary care through the establishment of thresholds and maintenance of effort requirements applicable to all institutions currently receiving GME financing. This is to ensure that institutions truly support training the primary care physicians this country needs.

These collective GME refinancing recommendations would result in positive changes for the future of family medicine training. We anticipate a more robust workforce in a variety of geographic and practice settings. The larger impact would be shifting the focus of health care away from acute illness and toward population health and preventative care. The medical organizations that represent teaching hospitals are opposed to these changes, however.

As family physicians, we must start educating our colleagues in other specialties on why the current system is unsustainable and harmful to patients and physicians alike, emphasizing that better health outcomes occur when primary care is available and affordable. Second, we must collaborate with other primary care specialties in order to speak to the value of primary care with a unified voice. Program directors carry a strong influence in their communities. Our call to action: Contact your representatives and ask them to sponsor or support a bill that includes the AAFP’s proposal for GME reform. Use the AAFP’s resources (http://www.aafp.org/advocacy/informed/workforce/gme.html) to educate your legislators on this very important topic. Encourage your residents, faculty, and patients to do the same. Change comes when we speak with one voice on an issue that affects every American. It’s time to fix this broken system.

  • © 2015 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Weida NA,
    2. Phillips RL Jr.,
    3. Bazemore AW
    . Does graduate medical education also follow green? Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(4):389–390.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Eden J,
    2. Berwick D,
    3. Wilensky G
    , eds. Institute of Medicine (IOM). Graduate Medical Education That Meets the Nation’s Health Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2014.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (2)
Vol. 13, Issue 2
March/April 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A PRESCRIPTION TO ADVOCATE FOR GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION REFORM
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A PRESCRIPTION TO ADVOCATE FOR GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION REFORM
Michael Mazzone, Natasha Bhuyan, Gretchen M. Dickson, James W. Jarvis, Lisa Maxwell, W. Fred Miser, Karen Mitchell, Stephen Schultz, Todd Shaffer, Michael Tuggy
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2015, 13 (2) 184-185; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1771

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
A PRESCRIPTION TO ADVOCATE FOR GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION REFORM
Michael Mazzone, Natasha Bhuyan, Gretchen M. Dickson, James W. Jarvis, Lisa Maxwell, W. Fred Miser, Karen Mitchell, Stephen Schultz, Todd Shaffer, Michael Tuggy
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2015, 13 (2) 184-185; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1771
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • STFM Announces New Point of Care Ultrasound Task Force and Initiative on POCUS Family Medicine Education
  • Addressing Research Pathway Gaps: Insights from a Needs Assessment at the AAFP Future Conference
  • Support for the WHO Resolution on Social Participation
Show more Family Medicine Updates

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine