Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleMethodology

Challenges of Prolonged Follow-up and Temporal Imbalance in Pragmatic Trials: Analysis of the ENCOURAGE Trial

Joshua S. Richman, Susan Andreae and Monika M. Safford
The Annals of Family Medicine August 2015, 13 (Suppl 1) S66-S72; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1790
Joshua S. Richman
1Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
2Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jrichman@uabmc.edu
Susan Andreae
3Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monika M. Safford
3Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    The timing of baseline and follow-up data collection in the ENCOURAGE trial displaying temporal differences by study group.

    B. Elapsed time from baseline data collection to follow-up in days, with a vertical line at 15 months, the standard cut-off point for 1-year follow-up. By the 15-month point, 268 participants had been followed up, of whom 51.4% (138) were in the intervention group and 48.5% (130) in the control group. After that point, 92 participants were followed up, of whom 32.6% (30) were in the intervention group and 67.4% (62) were in the control group.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    The seasonal trend in HbA1c levels in the ENCOURAGE trial.

    Note: The figure reflects all baseline observations reported in calendar days where January 1 is day 1 and December 31 is day 365. The period represented runs from late February to late August.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    The change in BMI attributable to the intervention over time, by linear model and GAMM.

    Note: The plot shows the adjusted model results for the difference between intervention and control groups (the intervention effect) with 95% confidence regions bounded by thin dashed lines. The heavy dashed line shows no linear effect over time, while the heavy solid line shows the GAMM results, which allow the effect over time to be nonlinear. The GAMM P <.05 and the estimated degrees of freedom (EDF) >1 indicate that the association is significant and that the nonlinearity is important.

    GAMM = generalized additive mixed models.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (Suppl 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (Suppl 1)
Vol. 13, Issue Suppl 1
August 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Challenges of Prolonged Follow-up and Temporal Imbalance in Pragmatic Trials: Analysis of the ENCOURAGE Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Challenges of Prolonged Follow-up and Temporal Imbalance in Pragmatic Trials: Analysis of the ENCOURAGE Trial
Joshua S. Richman, Susan Andreae, Monika M. Safford
The Annals of Family Medicine Aug 2015, 13 (Suppl 1) S66-S72; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1790

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Challenges of Prolonged Follow-up and Temporal Imbalance in Pragmatic Trials: Analysis of the ENCOURAGE Trial
Joshua S. Richman, Susan Andreae, Monika M. Safford
The Annals of Family Medicine Aug 2015, 13 (Suppl 1) S66-S72; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1790
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • DIFFERENCES FROM ORIGINAL PLANS AND RESULTING ANALYTIC CHALLENGES
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Peer Coaches to Improve Diabetes Outcomes in Rural Alabama: A Cluster Randomized Trial
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Designing and Implementing an Electronic Health Record–Embedded Card Study in Primary Care: Methods and Considerations
  • Considerations Before Selecting a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial Design for a Practice Improvement Study
  • Measuring Primary Care Across 35 OECD Countries
Show more METHODOLOGY

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • statistical data interpretation
  • nonlinear models
  • community-based trials

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine