Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Advance Care Planning Meets Group Medical Visits: The Feasibility of Promoting Conversations

Hillary D. Lum, Jacqueline Jones, Daniel D. Matlock, Russell E. Glasgow, Ingrid Lobo, Cari R. Levy, Robert S. Schwartz, Rebecca L. Sudore and Jean S. Kutner
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2016, 14 (2) 125-132; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1906
Hillary D. Lum
1Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
2VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Denver, Colorado
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Hillary.Lum@ucdenver.edu
Jacqueline Jones
3College of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
PhD, RN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel D. Matlock
1Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
2VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Denver, Colorado
4Colorado Research in Implementation Science Program, Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Russell E. Glasgow
2VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Denver, Colorado
4Colorado Research in Implementation Science Program, Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ingrid Lobo
5Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cari R. Levy
6Denver-Seattle Center for Veteran-centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver, Colorado
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert S. Schwartz
1Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
2VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Denver, Colorado
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca L. Sudore
7University of California, San Francisco Division of Geriatrics, VA Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, California
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean S. Kutner
5Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Patient experience of the conversation group medical visit.

    Note: Data are drawn from an evaluation that patients completed to assess their levels of agreement with 4 statements concerning acceptability of the Conversation Group Medical Visit. The evaluation used a 5-point Likert scale. (n = 29; 2 patients did not complete evaluations.)

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Patient engagement in advance care planning conversations.

    Note: During Session 1 and after participating in Session 2, patients were asked if they had had an advance care planning conversation. Bars represent the percentage of patients who answered, “Yes. The conversations included enough details that I feel confident my loved ones know my wishes.” (P = .02)

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Conversation Group Medical Visit Structure

    Structural ElementContent
    Overview
     SessionsTwo sessions, 1 month apart
     PatientsGoal of 8 to 12 patients per cohort
     Practice settingA practice able to coordinate group medical visit processes as a clinical team.
     LocationClinic conference room
     Optional resourcesPatient handouts; video projector; white erase board; water
    Facilitator considerationsFacilitators need to represent 2 disciplines (physician and social worker).
    One needs to be a physician, physician assistant or advanced practice nurse able to bill for the medical visit.
    Facilitators must be able to facilitate a group and engage patients in behavior change.
    Facilitators must be knowledgeable in advance care planning.
    Group visit session format2-hour sessions formatted as follows:
    Arrival, check-in, medical update (30 minutes)
    Introductions and rapport building (20 minutes)
    Advance care planning discussion using a communication guide and decision aids (60 minutes)
    Individual goal-setting (10 minutes)
    Optional: Workshop time to complete advance directives
    Optional: Individual clinical visits (10 minutes)
    Documentation and billingDocument any individual evaluation and management services provided (typically CPT code 99213).
    Update record with surrogate decision maker(s), care preferences, advance directives, medical orders for scope of treatment, code status preference as needed.
    Communicate advance care planning preferences with primary care provider.
    • CPT = Current procedural terminology.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Facilitators’ Communication Guide

    TopicExamples of Facilitator Questions and Sample Prompts
    Session 1
    IntroductionToday’s goals are to talk about what’s important to you for your future health care choices and advance care planning. As we start, can you introduce yourself and share why you chose to come today?
    Share advance care planning experiencesHave you started thinking about what is most important to you? Have you or someone close to you had experiences with serious illness or death?
    Consider personal valuesReferring to the Conversation Starter Kit, “Consider ‘what matters to me is…’ and ‘what matters to me at the end of life is…’. What do these questions bring up for you?”20
    What do you worry about concerning your health in the future?
    Choose a surrogate decision maker(s)Who would be a good decision maker? Do you have a medical durable power of attorney? Have you talked with him or her?
    Goal-settingBased on today’s discussion, what goal do you have for between now and next session? [Suggest identifying a surrogate decision maker.]
    Session 2
    Review individual advance care planning goalsWhat was your goal regarding advance care planning or having a conversation, and how did it go?
    Consider flexibility in decision makingLet’s watch videos from the PREPARE website.24 This is about how much flexibility you want a decision-maker to have. Do you want him or her to have total flexibility, some flexibility, or no flexibility?
    Consider future health care choicesHave you thought about the kind of care you would or would not want to receive if you became very sick?24 How much are you willing to go through if it means you might have more time?
    Plan for conversations with health care professionalsHow much does your primary care provider know about what’s important to you? What questions do you need to ask him or her?
    Goal settingWhat are your next steps regarding advance care planning? [Suggest talking with a clinician.]
    • View popup
    Table 3

    Characteristics of Conversation Group Medical Visit Participants Compared With Patients Who Were Approached But Did Not Participate

    CharacteristicParticipated(n = 32)Did Not Participate (n = 48)
    Age, mean (SD), y79 (5.3)78 (6.8)
    Women, No. (%)19 (59)34 (71)
    Race, No. (%)
     Native American1 (3.1)N/A
     Hispanic or Latino1 (3.1)
     Black or African American7 (22)
     White (non-Latino)23 (72)
    Relationship status, No. (%)
     Married or with partner16 (50)N/A
     Widowed9 (28)
     Divorced or separated4 (13)
     Single2 (6.3)
    Self-reported health status,a No. (%)
     Excellent or very good13 (42)N/A
     Good, fair, or poor13 (42)
    Caregiver for another person, No. (%)7 (23)N/A
    Attended with a partner, No. (%)10 (31)N/A
    Type of insurance,b No. (%)
     Medicare32 (100)45 (94)
     Medicare supplement14 (44)21 (44)
     Tricare17 (53)19 (40)
     Medicaid4 (13)4 (8.0)
    Education, No. (%)
     Less than high school graduate1 (3.1)N/A
     High school graduate/GED3 (9.4)
     Some college7 (22)
     College graduate7 (22)
     Any postgraduate or professional10 (31)
    Living situation, No. (%)
     Home or apartment27 (84)N/A
     Independent living community3 (9.4)
    Referral Source, No. (%)
     Referred by primary care clinician26 (81)43 (90)
     Self-referred3 (9.4)0 (0)
     Referred by partner or friend3 (9.4)5 (11)
    Reason for not participating, No. (%)
     Interested, but at a future dateN/A2 (4.2)
     DeclinedcN/A30 (63)
     Unable to reachN/A3 (6.3)
     Scheduled but cancelled or no showN/A13 (27)
    • ↵a At Session 1.

    • ↵b Includes multiple payer sources when known.

    • ↵c See text for reasons for declining.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Topics Brought Up By Conversation Group Medical Visit Patients

    TopicQuotation
    Advance directivesAdvance directives are not something done once in your lifetime…. Your health changes. Your circumstances. You age. They don’t have to be something that is done only once.
    Artificial nutrition and hydrationThe main thing is to keep people comfortable. Keep them out of pain. But without eating, without food, isn’t there pain? If they don’t feed you intravenously?
    Cardiopulmonary resuscitationOn CPR, one of the things was busted ribs…. There were several other negative aspects of getting CPR.
    DementiaI have a new dilemma since my wife has dementia. We both have signed Do Not Resuscitate. The question is should we also sign a Do Not Prolong Life statement? For instance, if she gets a urinary tract infection, should they give her antibiotics?
    Emergency careLet me ask you about the practicality of things. Let’s say you have documents but you have an emergency at home and the ambulance comes and takes you to the nearest hospital. Well, they don’t have that document.
    Hospice careI’m thinking of my mother, who told me in May…. She said ‘I’m ready to go. I’ve done everything in my life I want to do.’ It chokes me up when I heard this. And she was 93. She wasn’t in any pain…. And she had hospice, which she had agreed to earlier.
    Can you explain Hospice to me? We have a friend that has cancer and he’s getting that, and I just don’t know that much about it.
    Life sustaining treatmentIs there a significant number who have declared I do not want life support and then changed their mind at the last moment?
    Long-term careI’ll finish this sentence: What matters to me at the end of life is… I’ve had some experience. I just put down no Nursing Home. Because I had an experience of two months with assisted living and then I had two months in rehab…. And so I indicated in my own family that it is really the last place I want to be.
    Organ donationAs you approach our age, are there any organs that are still desirable?
    Palliative careI think we tend to agree that at this stage we would basically go with palliative care… to make sure she is comfortable.
    • CPR = cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Advance Care Planning Meets Group Medical Visits: The Feasibility of Promoting Conversations

    Hillary D. Lum , and colleagues

    Background Primary care needs new models to facilitate advance care planning conversations. This study describes a pilot demonstration of a group visit for advance care planning that engages patients in detailed conversations by providing a safe and supportive environment.

    What This Study Found Group visits offer a feasible approach for facilitating discussions about advance care planning. Most participants evaluated the group visit as better than usual clinic visits for discussing advance care planning. After two 90-minute sessions, patients reported increases in detailed advance planning conversations. Participants were willing to share personal values and challenges related to advance care planning and initiated discussions about a broad range of related topics.

    Implications

    • The authors conclude the model warrants further evaluation for effectiveness in improving advance care planning outcomes for patients, clinicians and the health care system.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 14 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 14 (2)
Vol. 14, Issue 2
March/April 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Advance Care Planning Meets Group Medical Visits: The Feasibility of Promoting Conversations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Advance Care Planning Meets Group Medical Visits: The Feasibility of Promoting Conversations
Hillary D. Lum, Jacqueline Jones, Daniel D. Matlock, Russell E. Glasgow, Ingrid Lobo, Cari R. Levy, Robert S. Schwartz, Rebecca L. Sudore, Jean S. Kutner
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2016, 14 (2) 125-132; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1906

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Advance Care Planning Meets Group Medical Visits: The Feasibility of Promoting Conversations
Hillary D. Lum, Jacqueline Jones, Daniel D. Matlock, Russell E. Glasgow, Ingrid Lobo, Cari R. Levy, Robert S. Schwartz, Rebecca L. Sudore, Jean S. Kutner
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2016, 14 (2) 125-132; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1906
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Advance care planning in COPD: guidance development for healthcare professionals
  • Clinician Perspectives on Group Visits for Advance Care Planning Among Caregivers and Older Adult Patients With Heart Failure
  • Feasibility of Group Visits for Advance Care Planning Among Patients with Heart Failure and Their Caregivers
  • Effect of an Interactive Website to Engage Patients in Advance Care Planning in Outpatient Settings
  • Barriers, enablers and initiatives for uptake of advance care planning in general practice: a systematic review and critical interpretive synthesis
  • CPR decision-making conversations in the UK: an integrative review
  • A Group Visit Initiative Improves Advance Care Planning Documentation among Older Adults in Primary Care
  • In This Issue: Confronting Constraints on Individual Behavior & Outcomes
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
  • Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Person groups:
    • Older adults
    • Vulnerable populations
  • Methods:
    • Qualitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Professional practice
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Personalized care

Keywords

  • advance care planning
  • group medical visits
  • patient engagement

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine