Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
NewsDepartmentsF

IN PURSUIT OF 1,650

Gretchen M. Dickson, James W. Jarvis and Lynn Pickeral
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2016, 14 (5) 480-481; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1986
Gretchen M. Dickson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James W. Jarvis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lynn Pickeral
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Many words can be used to describe the work that a family medicine residency program director does during a typical day: teacher, administrator, counselor, coach, cheerleader, and, of course, tabulator of patient encounters. Of the visits a program director counts, perhaps none is more famous than the 1,650 continuity patient encounters required in the family medicine practice site before a resident may graduate. Many a program director has wondered if evidence exists that 1,650 patient visits is the best marker for knowing a potential graduate has achieved adequate experience in ambulatory care during residency.

At the simplest level, the requirement for 1,650 patient visits can be viewed as an arithmetic calculation based upon the concept that experience will lead to expertise. Assume that residents progress in both number of sessions in the office and number of patients per session throughout residency and also assume that residents see patients for 44 weeks per year to allow for vacation or away rotation. The calculation is simply: Embedded Image

The ACGME Program Requirements exist to set minimum standards of education, thus, the 1,650 requirement is best understood as a baseline to ensure that the resident has appropriate patient volume and frequency of sessions.

A literature review reveals no studies that suggest a count of 1,650 patient visits confers the competence to practice ambulatory family medicine. Perhaps 1 resident is prepared for ambulatory practice after only 1,200 visits while another will require over 2,000. Determining competence is a much more nuanced process, requiring frequent observations of the resident. Feedback about performance of component skills as well as the integration of skills into a global whole rather than simply completion of a number of visits. A count of experiences cannot be an adequate substitute for thorough, frequent observations when the goal is determining competence.

The requirement of 1,650 patient encounters should not be dismissed as being without worth, however. Competency-based assessments are still very much in fledgling form, with educators striving to understand how to capture the data necessary for such evaluations in a manner that is accurate, reproducible, and doable. Competence requires experience so that a learner may begin to appreciate the common and not-so-common presentations of disease. The 1,650 requirement provides a surrogate marker of adequate experience to allow residency educators to begin to make an in-depth assessment of competence once adequate experience has been attained.

In our zeal to pursue competency-based assessments, it would be a grave mistake to discard all requirements based upon experience. In order to appreciate the breadth of family medicine, a resident must see a variety of patients. One does not learn all there is to know about diabetes from seeing 1 patient with diabetes. Adequate experience is key to ensuring an appreciation of the varied presentations of health and disease in patients across the spectrum of age and condition. An appreciation of the subtleties of the art of medicine cannot develop after seeing only a single example of pathology.

It would be a similarly serious error to consider the completion of 1,650 patient visits to be the sole indicator that a resident is prepared to enter practice. We ask our graduates to take on responsibility for patients, families, and communities with outstanding skills in diagnosis and treatment of disease as well as proficiency in communication, interpersonal skills, and systems-based practice. It is not enough to deem them competent after seeing a specified number of patients when what we ask of them is that they appreciate the complexity and context of each individual who presents with a given diagnosis and attend to their unique experience of health and disease in a continuous trusting relationship. A simple number can never tell us if they are prepared to undertake this critical and complex task.

Seeing 1,650 patients is a necessary but incomplete picture of a resident’s preparedness to embark upon unsupervised ambulatory practice. One thousand, six hundred and fifty patient visits provide experience in which the resident can develop competence in the art of medicine. Only when experience is coupled with careful assessments of competency performed by faculty and program directors can we ensure our graduates are truly prepared for the task they undertake as family physicians.

  • © 2016 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 14 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine
Vol. 14, Issue 5
September/October 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
IN PURSUIT OF 1,650
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
IN PURSUIT OF 1,650
Gretchen M. Dickson, James W. Jarvis, Lynn Pickeral
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2016, 14 (5) 480-481; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1986

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
IN PURSUIT OF 1,650
Gretchen M. Dickson, James W. Jarvis, Lynn Pickeral
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2016, 14 (5) 480-481; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1986
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Departments

  • HIGH-STAKES KNOWLEDGE ASSESSMENT AT ABFM: WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED AND HOW IT IS USEFUL
  • FROM AFMRD: WHO TO GO TO FOR WHAT: THE ABFM OR THE ACGME
  • FROM STFM: ADDICTION EXPERTS COLLABORATE WITH STFM TO CREATE NEW NATIONAL ADDICTION CURRICULUM
Show more Departments

Family Medicine Updates

  • HIGH-STAKES KNOWLEDGE ASSESSMENT AT ABFM: WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED AND HOW IT IS USEFUL
  • FROM AFMRD: WHO TO GO TO FOR WHAT: THE ABFM OR THE ACGME
  • FROM STFM: ADDICTION EXPERTS COLLABORATE WITH STFM TO CREATE NEW NATIONAL ADDICTION CURRICULUM
Show more Family Medicine Updates

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2022 Annals of Family Medicine