Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
EditorialEditorial

In This Issue: Powerful Ideas for Action

Kurt C. Stange
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2017, 15 (1) 2-4; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2024
Kurt C. Stange
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

This abundant issue of Annals of Family Medicine showcases a plethora of powerful and actionable ideas for improving health, health care, and society.

NURTURING SPACE FOR CIVIL DISCOURSE

A Perspectives editorial by Romano and Grumbach provides a balanced and powerful reflection on recent events in the United States that echo worldwide happenings. 1 They ask us to consider what it means to be a healthy society, and they issue 4 calls to action for family physicians and all who recognize our essential interrelatedness.

I would add a fifth call to action.

Novelist, essayist, and poet Wendell Berry notes that health is (participation in) community.2 In a time when what passes for public discourse are soundbites designed to elicit an immediate visceral reaction that forces us into one of 2 apparently warring camps, family physicians are uniquely positioned to nurture community. By seeing both the person and the community, by valuing both our differences and our underlying commonality, family physicians can foster healing by creating space for resistance without divisiveness, for finding common ground without giving up core principles, and for growing community, one relationship at a time.

PRIORITIZING: AN UNDERAPPRECIATED ASPECT OF PRIMARY CARE

Prioritizing is an essential feature of robust primary care.3 Scanning and focusing on the most important items4 among the 35 or 56 or 257 interrelated medical, social, and environmental problems that people bring to primary care provides tremendous value to individuals, and makes more narrowly focused health care more effective when referral is needed.8 Prioritizing within the whole-person, relationship-centered primary care approach takes what otherwise might be crude rationing if done at the level of explicit or implicit policy,9 and turns it into care that focuses on what is most important for the particulars of the individual, 10 while taking into account the trade-offs for the family and community.11 Prioritizing care based on knowing the person, family, and community protects people from overtreatment12 and overcomes what otherwise can be a dangerous13 and lonely journey through fragmented health care.14,15

Therefore, we are delighted that the National Commission on Prevention Priorities has chosen to publish the latest update to their work in Annals. The National Commission has developed a scientific method for what heretofore has been the art of medicine and policy—prioritizing among many good options. The latest update of their work expands this method with microsimulation modeling, and applies it to show the relative health impact and cost-effectiveness of preventive services for which the US Preventive Services Task Force found evidence of effectiveness.16 These findings can be used by individuals, practices, and policy makers to focus attention on the preventive services that are most likely to make a difference.

Two additional papers use sophisticated microsimulation analyses to identify which preventive options for cardiovascular disease are most effective for the general population and for subgroups,17 and to examine the separate and collective impact of brief clinician tobacco counseling for youth and for adults.18

Editorials by David Satcher,19 George Isham and colleagues,20 and Patrick O’Connor and colleagues21 provide complementary and helpful perspectives in understanding this scientific evidence on prioritizing preventive services, and in applying it in policy and practice.

Also in this issue, a study by Saver and colleagues goes beyond the work of the National Commission on Prevention Priorities to address the difficult issue of assisting patients with making decisions about cancer screening that may seem beneficial, but actually have little known benefit. In a sophisticated randomized crossover study, they evaluate decision aids for controversial US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations surrounding prostate cancer screening for men and mammography testing for women aged 40 to 49 years.22 They find that the decision aid reduces intention to engage in screening tests with poor evidence of efficacy.

A CALL TO ACTION FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS AND PRIMARY CARE CLINICIANS

A Special Report by Saultz and Saultz, featured in Annals Journal Club,23 highlights common ground between primary care clinicians and school teachers. Both fields are facing similar oppression from a top-down “measure and incentivize” culture that risks stomping out their personalizing work in caring for schoolchildren and patients. The authors identify alarming unintended consequences of performance management in both education and health care. These consequences of narrowing of purpose, de-professionalization, and loss of local/community control, are most likely to affect the most vulnerable.24

The article should shock policy makers into reexamining a measurement paradigm that increasingly is oppressing teachers and primary care clinicians, and for many children and patients, results in less effective education and health care. The Saultz paper is a call to action for the education and health care professions to rise up together for support rather than incentives. The paper emphasizes valuing personal, local knowledge, rather than disempowering it with impersonal measures, and calls for deeper understanding and support of the personalizing, integrating, prioritizing functions that frontlines teachers and primary care clinicians do every day while swimming against a stream of measurement burden that is often irrelevant and sometimes harmful.

PRIMARY CARE INFLUENCES

In the face of evidence that excessive interventions in the last 6 months of life are associated with suffering and unnecessary, unhelpful costs, Bazemore et al use national Medicare claims data to examine primary care physician involvement in the last 6 months of patients’ lives. They find that greater primary care physician involvement is associated with less intensive end of life care, including lower expenditure, less intensive care unit days, and less hospice enrollment.25

At the other end of the age spectrum, an essay by Ungar uses recent neuroscience findings to link the “joyful bond that unites mother and infant” with early brain development and the opportunities presented by even brief health care interactions during well-infant and post-partum visits.26

Volkmann courageously shares her “experience as a survivor of sexual violence and as a provider for patients whose wounds from these traumas have flourished in atmospheres of shame and stigma.”27 Her deeply personal insights show how clinicians can help facilitate healing.

The preferences of mothers for vitamin D supplementation of their breastfed infants is ascertained by Thacher et al.28 Most preferred to supplement themselves rather than their infants.

Trends in health information technology among small primary care practices are examined by Rittenhouse and colleagues.29 They find increases over time in 16 out of 18 measures of health information technology functionality, particularly among hospital-owned practices, practices with 3 to 8 vs 1 to 2 physicians, practices with more Medicare patients, and those participating in pay-for-performance or public reporting of quality data.

We welcome your reflections at http://www.AnnFamMed.org.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of Interest: Kurt Stange has been a member of the National Commission of Prevention Priorities since it began.

  • © 2017 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Romano M,
    2. Grumbach K
    . Family medicine in a divided nation. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(1):4–6.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Wirzba N
    1. Berry W
    . Health is membership. In: Wirzba N, ed. The Art of the Commonplace: The Agrarian Essays of Wendell Berry. Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint; 2002:144–158.
  3. ↵
    1. Stange KC
    . A science of connectedness. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(5): 387–395.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Stange KC
    . The generalist approach. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(3): 198–203.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Flocke SA,
    2. Frank SH,
    3. Wenger DA
    . Addressing multiple problems in the family medicine office visit. J Fam Pract. 2001;50(3):211–216.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Beasley JW,
    2. Hankey TH,
    3. Erickson R,
    4. et al
    . How many problems do family physicians manage at each encounter? A WReN study. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(5):405–410.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Bolen SD,
    2. Sage P,
    3. Perzynski AT,
    4. Stange KC
    . No moment wasted: the primary-care visit for adults with diabetes and low socio-economic status. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016;17(1):18–32.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Stange KC,
    2. Jaén CR,
    3. Flocke SA,
    4. Miller WL,
    5. Crabtree BF,
    6. Zyzanski SJ
    . The value of a family physician. J Fam Pract. 1998;46(5):363–368.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Gold MR
    . Tea, biscuits, and health care prioritizing. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(1):234–239.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. McWhinney IR
    . ‘An acquaintance with particulars...’. Fam Med. 1989;21(4):296–298.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Donaldson MS,
    2. Lohr KN,
    3. Vanselow NA
    , eds. Primary Care: America’s Health in a New Era. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.
  12. ↵
    1. Franks P,
    2. Clancy CM,
    3. Nutting PA
    . Gatekeeping revisited—protecting patients from overtreatment. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(6):424–429.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Weiner SJ,
    2. Schwartz A,
    3. Weaver F,
    4. et al
    . Contextual errors and failures in individualizing patient care: a multicenter study. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(2):69–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Beach MC,
    2. Inui T
    . Relationship-centered care. A constructive reframing. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(Suppl 1):S3–S8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Kohn LT,
    2. Corrigan JM,
    3. Donaldson MS
    , eds. To Err is Human. Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
  16. ↵
    1. Maciosek MV,
    2. Dehmer SP,
    3. Flottemesch TJ,
    4. et al
    . Updated priorities among effective clinical preventive services. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(1):14–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Dehmer SP,
    2. Maciosek MV,
    3. LaFrance A,
    4. Flottemesch TJ
    . Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of asymptomatic screening for hypertension and high cholesterol and aspirin counseling for primary prevention. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(1):23–36.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Maciosek MV,
    2. Dehmer SP,
    3. Xu Z,
    4. et al
    . Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of brief clinician tobacco counseling for youth and adults. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(1):37–47.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Satcher D
    . Preventive interventions: an immediate priority. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(1):8–9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Isham G,
    2. Sanchez E,
    3. Jones W,
    4. Teutsch S,
    5. Woolf S,
    6. Haddix A
    . Prevention priorities: guidance for value-driven health improvement. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(1):6–8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. O’Connor PJ,
    2. Sperl-Hillen J,
    3. Kottke TE,
    4. Margolis K
    . Strategies to prioritize clinical options in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(1):10–13.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Saver BG,
    2. Luckmann R,
    3. Cutrona S,
    4. et al
    . Persuasive interventions for controversial cancer screening recommendations: testing a novel approach to help patients make evidence-based decisions. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(1):48–55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Johansen ME
    . Measuring outcomes: lessons from the world of public education. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(1):iii.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Saultz A,
    2. Saultz JW
    . Measuring outcomes: lessons from the world of public education. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(1):71–76.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Ankuda C,
    2. Petterson SM,
    3. Wingrove P,
    4. Bazemore AW
    . Regional variation in primary care involvement at the end of life. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(1):63–67.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Ungar T
    . Neuroscience, joy, and the well-infant visit that got me thinking. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(1):80–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Volkmann ER
    . Silent survivors. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(1):77–79.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Umaretiya P,
    2. Oberhelman S,
    3. Cozine E,
    4. Maxson J,
    5. Quigg S,
    6. Thacher TD
    . Maternal preferences for vitamin D supplementation in breastfed infants. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(1):68–70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Rittenhouse DR,
    2. Ramsay PP,
    3. Casalino LP,
    4. McClellan S,
    5. Kandel ZK,
    6. Shortell SM
    . Increased health information technology adoption and use among small primary care physician practices over time: a national cohort study. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(1):56–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (1)
Vol. 15, Issue 1
January/February 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In This Issue: Powerful Ideas for Action
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
In This Issue: Powerful Ideas for Action
Kurt C. Stange
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2017, 15 (1) 2-4; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2024

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
In This Issue: Powerful Ideas for Action
Kurt C. Stange
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2017, 15 (1) 2-4; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2024
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • NURTURING SPACE FOR CIVIL DISCOURSE
    • PRIORITIZING: AN UNDERAPPRECIATED ASPECT OF PRIMARY CARE
    • A CALL TO ACTION FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS AND PRIMARY CARE CLINICIANS
    • PRIMARY CARE INFLUENCES
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Obstacles and Opportunities on the Path to Improving Health Professions Education and Practice: Lessons From HRSA’s Academic Units for Primary Care Training and Enhancement
  • COVID-19 and Primary Care: Taking Stock
  • A Follow-Up to “The Family Tree Spreads its Limbs: National Academy of Medicine Family Physician New Members 2021”
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine