Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Brief

Patient Attitudes and Participation in Hand Co-Washing in an Outpatient Clinic Before and After a Prompt

Gregory A. Doyle, Jun Xiang, Hina Zaman, Holli Neiman-Hart, Michael Maroon, Elham Arghami, Hina Durani, Hari Salana, Venugopal Komakula and Dana E. King
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2017, 15 (2) 155-157; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2033
Gregory A. Doyle
Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: doyleg@wvumedicine.org
Jun Xiang
Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hina Zaman
Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Holli Neiman-Hart
Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
MD, FAAFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Maroon
Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elham Arghami
Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hina Durani
Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hari Salana
Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Venugopal Komakula
Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dana E. King
Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Despite recent national emphasis, outpatient hand washing can be less than optimal. We tested a new approach involving both patient and physician hand washing. The study consisted of 384 questionnaires, 184 from phase 1 and 200 from phase 2. Patients stated doctors washed their hands 96.6% before examining them pre-intervention and 99.5% of the time post-intervention. Patients endorsed the importance of hand washing 98.7% of the time. “Co-washing” may offer a process to increase the practice of hand washing and decrease infection risk.

  • hand washing
  • infection control
  • quality improvement

INTRODUCTION

H and hygiene has been identified as being critical in preventing the spread of hospital-acquired infections.1 Although hand hygiene by health care clinicians is a standard component of patient safety, a review of hand hygiene studies initiated by the World Health Organization (WHO) found that baseline compliance with hand hygiene among health care workers was only 38.7% on average, with a range from 5% to 89%.2

Although the emphasis of effective hand hygiene practice has been placed on health care workers, it was noted that there was a significant decrease in hospital-acquired Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus once patients were encouraged to wash their hands.3 In the general population, it was widely recognized that hand washing could lower the risks of respiratory infections, eye infections, diarrhea, intestinal problems, pneumonia, and impetigo.4,5 Patient performance of hand washing has been advocated by the WHO Alliance of Patient Safety and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).6 Patients have been noted to carry multidrug resistant organisms on their hands 24.1% of the time when they leave an acute care facility.7 We examined hand-washing rates in a busy outpatient clinic and explored whether a “co-washing” approach would be of benefit.

METHODS

This project was a quality improvement (QI) study. There were 2 phases of data collection and an intervention before the second phase. The institutional review board approved this as an exempted study.

A patient hand-washing questionnaire (Supplemental Appendix, http://www.annfammed.org/content/15/2/155/suppl/DC1) was created by the QI team of 7 family medicine health care clinicians. It consisted of 7 questions, 4 regarding patients’ observations of hand-washing performance by health clinicians, and 3 assessing patients’ attitudes toward patient hand washing. Each patient’s age and sex were recorded in the questionnaire.

Beginning in October 2013, the QI team started distributing the questionnaires in their clinics. Because this was the baseline assessment for patient hand-washing attitudes, the clinician asked—without any signs of encouragement—whether or not the patient would like to wash hands at the beginning of the visit.

After the initial collection of the questionnaires, the QI team displayed flyers and offered gel in the clinic encouraging hand washing by patients. Two months after the installation of the flyers, 6 remaining providers of the QI team implemented a new procedure. In the new procedure, the clinician offered sanitizer to the patient and also used the sanitizer to wash their own hands in front of the patient. Patients were again surveyed regarding their attitudes and observations of hand washing.

Data were analyzed using SAS version 9.3. 2012 (SAS Institute Inc). Descriptive analysis was performed for all the variables. To compare the differences in patients’ sex, observation, and attitudes between the 2 phases, we incorporated bivariate statistics, using χ2 analysis. Fisher’s exact test instead of χ2 analysis was carried out once more than 20% of the expected cell sizes were less than 5. A t-test was also performed to examine the difference in patients’ age between the 2 phases. We used an alpha of 0.05 to determine the significance of all statistical tests.

RESULTS

A total of 399 questionnaires were collected during the project. Fifteen questionnaires were excluded due to the respondent being aged younger than 18 years. The final study sample consisted of 384 questionnaires, 184 from the phase 1 (pre-intervention) and 200 from the phase 2 (post-intervention). Patients stated doctors washed their hands 96.6% before examining them pre-intervention and 99.5% of the time post-intervention.

As shown in the Table 1, the majority of patients participating in the project were females (65.6%) and the mean age of the patients was 47.5 years. While there were no significant differences in proportions of responses to the first 5 questions before and after the intervention; more patients gave positive responses to the last 2 questions after “co-washing” was implemented: “did the nurse or doctor encourage you to wash your hands?” (83.8% vs 61.3%, P <.001) and “did you wash your hands?’ (87.9% vs 79.0%, P =.02).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Patients’ Characteristics, Observations, and Attitudes Toward Hand Washing

DISCUSSION

In summary, patients endorsed hand washing and participated in hand washing 83.7% of the time. Of note, the physicians in this study were reported as washing their hands 98.1% of the time before they examined the patient and 92.6% of the time after they examined the patient. There were no significant differences in clinicians’ performance of hand washing after “co-washing” began. Data in this study greatly exceed those normally observed in the hand washing literature.8,9 Although no prior efforts have been made in the clinic to promote or quantitate patient hand washing, a prior audit of the clinic had lower results of 84% for physician hand washing.

The study expands on the model in which patients are requested to report on whether or not their doctor washed their hands in the hospital setting.10 The strengths of this study are that it is patient centered and addresses an important patient safety issue. The offering of hand sanitizer to the patient and clinician at the same time, which we deemed “co-washing,” is a simple intervention that can be done in almost any practice. This was a QI study designed as quaisi-experimental before-and-after study. There was no control group and the patients self-reported their hand washing which can weaken the validity and exaggerate the results.

Further research is recommended to determine whether “co-washing” enhances clinic hand washing or hand washing at home by patients, and whether it can reduce infection rates.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Ashley Higinbotham for her Administrative support.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of interest: authors report none.

  • Previous presentations: Round Table Discussion Preliminary phase I data discussed as QI: “Patient Hand Washing: Attitudes and Performance, A Patient Centered Approach to Quality Improvement,” STFM QI Conference; November 21–24, 2013; San Diego, California.

  • Supplementary materials: Available at http://www.AnnFamMed.org/content/15/2/155/suppl/DC1/.

  • Received for publication July 27, 2016.
  • Revision received October 21, 2016.
  • Accepted for publication October 30, 2016.
  • © 2017 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Pittet D,
    2. Simon A,
    3. Hugonnet S,
    4. Pessoa-Silva CL,
    5. Sauvan V,
    6. Perneger TV
    . Hand hygiene among physicians: performance, beliefs, and perceptions. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141(1): 1–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009.
  3. ↵
    1. Gagne D,
    2. Bedard G,
    3. Maziade PJ
    . Systematic patients’ hand disinfection: impact on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection rates in a community hospital. J Hosp Infect. 2010; 75(4): 269–272.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Luby SP,
    2. Agboatwalla M,
    3. Feikin DR,
    4. et al
    . Effect of handwashing on child health: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 366(9481): 225–233.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Little P,
    2. Stuart B,
    3. Hobbs FD,
    4. et al
    . An internet-delivered handwashing intervention to modify influenza-like illness and respiratory infection transmission (PRIMIT): a primary care randomised trial. Lancet. 2015; 386(10004): 1631–1639. [Published correction appears in: Lancet. 2015; 386(10004): 1630].
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    May 5: Hand Hygiene Day. (2014, May 1). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/Features/HandHygiene/index.html. Accessed Apr 11, 2016.
  7. ↵
    1. Cao J,
    2. Min L,
    3. Lansing B,
    4. Foxman B,
    5. Mody L
    . Multidrug-resistant organisms on patients’ hands: a missed opportunity. JAMA Intern Med. 2016; 176(5): 705–706.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Pittet D,
    2. Mourouga P,
    3. Perneger TV
    . Compliance with handwashing in a teaching hospital. Infection Control Program. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130(2): 126–130.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Eckmanns T,
    2. Bessert J,
    3. Behnke M,
    4. Gastmeier P,
    5. Ruden H
    . Compliance with antiseptic hand rub use in intensive care units: the Hawthorne effect. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006; 27(9): 931–934.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. McGuckin M,
    2. Waterman R,
    3. Porten L,
    4. et al
    . Patient education model for increasing handwashing compliance. Am J Infect Control. 1999; 27(4): 309–314.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (2)
Vol. 15, Issue 2
March/April 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patient Attitudes and Participation in Hand Co-Washing in an Outpatient Clinic Before and After a Prompt
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Patient Attitudes and Participation in Hand Co-Washing in an Outpatient Clinic Before and After a Prompt
Gregory A. Doyle, Jun Xiang, Hina Zaman, Holli Neiman-Hart, Michael Maroon, Elham Arghami, Hina Durani, Hari Salana, Venugopal Komakula, Dana E. King
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2017, 15 (2) 155-157; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2033

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Patient Attitudes and Participation in Hand Co-Washing in an Outpatient Clinic Before and After a Prompt
Gregory A. Doyle, Jun Xiang, Hina Zaman, Holli Neiman-Hart, Michael Maroon, Elham Arghami, Hina Durani, Hari Salana, Venugopal Komakula, Dana E. King
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2017, 15 (2) 155-157; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2033
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • In This Issue: On-the-Ground Advances & High-Level Influences
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Systematic Diabetes Screening Using Point-of-Care HbA1c Testing Facilitates Identification of Prediabetes
  • Patients Typing Their Own Visit Agendas Into an Electronic Medical Record: Pilot in a Safety-Net Clinic
Show more Original Brief

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Prevention
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Professional practice
  • Other topics:
    • Quality improvement

Keywords

  • hand washing
  • infection control
  • quality improvement

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine