Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
NewsDepartmentsF

TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION IN ADULTS OVER AGE 60 TO HIGHER VS LOWER TARGETS: A CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE FROM THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS

Amir Qaseem, Timothy J. Wilt, Robert Rich, Linda Humphrey, Jennifer Frost and Mary Ann Forciea
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2017, 15 (2) 185-186; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2046
Amir Qaseem
1American College of Physicians
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy J. Wilt
2Minneapolis VA Medical Center
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Rich
3Community Care of the Lower Cape Fear
MD, FAAFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda Humphrey
4Oregon Health and Science University
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Frost
5American Academy of Family Physicians
MD, FAAFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary Ann Forciea
6Penn Health System
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Executive Summary

Hypertension, defined as blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg, is a common chronic disease in the United States. It affects over a quarter of US adults and increases to almost two-thirds of adults aged over 60 years,1 and represents a substantial burden on health care services and costs in the United States.2 Appropriate management of hypertension reduces risk of cardiovascular disease, renal disease, cerebrovascular disease, and death.3–6 There is currently debate, however, on the most appropriate systolic blood pressure target in adults being treated for hypertension, particularly adults aged 60 years and older. The primary purpose of this guideline is to provide clinicians with evidence-based recommendations focused on the benefits and harms of higher (<150 mm Hg) vs lower (<140 mm Hg) systolic blood pressure targets for treatment of hypertension in adults aged 60 years and older.

A joint guideline development panel was convened with representatives from the American College of Physicians (ACP) and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) to develop recommendations based on a systematic review by the Portland Veteran’s Administration Health Care System Evidence-based Synthesis Program7 sponsored by the Veterans Administration. The guideline was created using the ACP’s guideline development process, which is based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach8 and is consistent with AAFP’s methodology.9 GRADE is a system where the strength of a recommendation is dependent on both the quality of evidence and the balance of benefits and harms (burden). Strong recommendations for a treatment or test are used when the benefits of treatment clearly outweigh the harms. Weak recommendations are used when there is a close balance of risk and benefit. The ACP and AAFP prioritize patient-oriented outcomes when evaluating the evidence and making recommendations. The outcomes evaluated for this guideline included all-cause mortality, stroke-related morbidity and mortality, cardiovascular events, and harms associated with higher and lower treatment targets.

The evidence report found high quality evidence that treating individuals with hypertension to moderate levels (<150 mm Hg) reduces mortality, stroke, and cardiovascular events. For patients with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), moderate quality evidence showed treating to blood pressure targets to <130–140 mm Hg reduced the risk of recurrent stroke, but did not have a statistically significant effect on cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality. Blood pressure targets of less than 140 mm Hg may be a reasonable goal for some patients at high cardiovascular risk. This recommendation is based on low quality evidence showing a small decrease in stroke and cardiac events in patients at high cardiovascular risk who were treated to lower target levels. There were no significant increases in major harms associated with lower treatment targets including end stage renal disease, quality of life, functional status, or falls. There were increased reports of study withdrawals due to adverse events, with cough and hypotension being the most frequently reported. There was also an increased risk of syncope associated with lower blood pressure targets. The decision to treat patients to lower blood pressure targets should be individualized and coupled with focused discussions with patients on benefits, harms, and costs.

Most patients aged over 60 years also have other multiple chronic conditions and it is important to perform an individualized assessment of benefits and harms. Although many of these patients theoretically will get a large benefit from aggressive blood pressure control, these patients are also susceptible to serious harms. In addition, these patients often are on multiple medications and difficult-to-manage drug regimens, increasing the risk of drug interactions.

Based on the evidence described above and in the evidence report, the panel agreed on the following recommendations:

  • RECOMMENDATION 1: ACP and AAFP recommend that clinicians initiate treatment in adults aged 60 years and older with persistent systolic blood pressure at or above 150 mm Hg to achieve a target systolic blood pressure of less than 150 mm Hg to reduce the risk of mortality, stroke, and cardiac events (strong recommendation, high quality of evidence). ACP and AAFP recommend that clinicians select the treatment goals for adults aged 60 years and older based on a periodic discussion of the benefits and harms of specific target levels of blood pressure with the patient.

  • RECOMMENDATION 2: ACP and AAFP recommend that clinicians consider initiating or intensifying treatment in adults aged 60 years and older with a history of stroke or TIA to achieve a target systolic blood pressure of less than 140 mm Hg to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke (weak recommendation, moderate quality of evidence). ACP and AAFP recommend that clinicians select the treatment goals for adults aged 60 years and older based on a periodic discussion of the benefits and harms of specific target levels of blood pressure with the patient.

  • RECOMMENDATION 3: ACP and AAFP recommend that clinicians consider initiating or intensifying treatment in some adults aged 60 years and older at high cardiovascular risk, based on individualized assessment, to achieve a target systolic blood pressure of less than 140 mm Hg to reduce the risk of stroke or cardiac events (weak recommendation, low quality of evidence). ACP and AAFP recommend that clinicians select the treatment goals for adults aged 60 years and older based on a periodic discussion of the benefits and harms of specific target levels of blood pressure with the patient.

For further reading on the evidence and recommendations, please refer to the AAFP summary and full guideline at http://www.aafp.org/patient-care/clinical-recommendations/all/hypertension-over-60.html.

Footnotes

  • Note: Clinical practice guidelines are “guides” only and may not apply to all patients and all clinical situations. Thus, they are not intended to override clinicians’ judgment.

  • Financial support: Financial support for this guideline comes exclusively from the operating budget of the American College of Physicians.

  • Conflict of Interest Statement: authors report none.

  • © 2017 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Yoon SS,
    2. Carroll MD,
    3. Fryar CD
    . Hypertension Prevalence and Control Among Adults: United States, 2011–2014. NCHS Data Brief. 2015;(220):1–8.
  2. ↵
    Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressures averaging 115 through 129 mm Hg. JAMA. 1967;202(11):1028–1034.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    MRC Working Party. Medical Research Council trial of treatment of hypertension in older adults: principal results. BMJ. 1992;304(6824):405–412.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. II. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 90 through 114 mm Hg. JAMA. 1970;213(7):1143–1152.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. The Australian therapeutic trial in mild hypertension. Report by the Management Committee. Lancet. 1980;1(8181):1261–1267.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Weiss J,
    2. Freeman M,
    3. Low A,
    4. et al
    . Benefits and harms of intensive blood pressure treatment in adults aged 60 years or older: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. [Epub ahead of print January 17, 2017] doi:10.7326/M16-1754.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Qaseem A,
    2. Snow V,
    3. Owens DK,
    4. Shekelle P
    ; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. The development of clinical practice guidelines and guidance statements of the American College of Physicians: summary of methods. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(3):194–199.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    American Academy of Family Physicians. Clinical practice guideline manual. 2015 http://www.aafp.org/patient-care/clinical-recommendations/cpg-manual.html. May 24, 2016.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (2)
Vol. 15, Issue 2
March/April 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION IN ADULTS OVER AGE 60 TO HIGHER VS LOWER TARGETS: A CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE FROM THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION IN ADULTS OVER AGE 60 TO HIGHER VS LOWER TARGETS: A CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE FROM THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS
Amir Qaseem, Timothy J. Wilt, Robert Rich, Linda Humphrey, Jennifer Frost, Mary Ann Forciea
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2017, 15 (2) 185-186; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2046

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION IN ADULTS OVER AGE 60 TO HIGHER VS LOWER TARGETS: A CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE FROM THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS
Amir Qaseem, Timothy J. Wilt, Robert Rich, Linda Humphrey, Jennifer Frost, Mary Ann Forciea
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2017, 15 (2) 185-186; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2046
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Executive Summary
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Departments

  • What do Primary Care Patients Want?
  • Support for the WHO Resolution on Social Participation
  • STFM Announces New Point of Care Ultrasound Task Force and Initiative on POCUS Family Medicine Education
Show more Departments

Family Medicine Updates

  • What do Primary Care Patients Want?
  • Support for the WHO Resolution on Social Participation
  • STFM Announces New Point of Care Ultrasound Task Force and Initiative on POCUS Family Medicine Education
Show more Family Medicine Updates

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine