Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticlePoint/Counterpoint

Point: How Quality Reporting Made Me a Better Doctor

David R. Scrase
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2017, 15 (3) 204-206; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2088
David R. Scrase
Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, The University of New Mexico Medical School, Albuquerque, New Mexico
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: DScrase@salud.unm.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Model to improve quality of patient care.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (3)
Vol. 15, Issue 3
May/June 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Point: How Quality Reporting Made Me a Better Doctor
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Point: How Quality Reporting Made Me a Better Doctor
David R. Scrase
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2017, 15 (3) 204-206; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2088

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Point: How Quality Reporting Made Me a Better Doctor
David R. Scrase
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2017, 15 (3) 204-206; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2088
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • STEP 1. AGREE ON THE STANDARD OF CARE
    • STEP 2: COLLECT AND PROVIDE INITIAL REPORTING OF THE DATA
    • STEP 3: ARGUE ABOUT THE DATA
    • STEP 4: IMPROVE THE DATA
    • STEP 5: PROVIDE ACTIONABLE DATA
    • STEP 6: IMPROVE CARE AND OUTCOMES
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • In This Issue: Innovations in Primary Care and at the Annals
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Is Prediabetes Overdiagnosed? No: A Clinician’s Perspective
  • Is Prediabetes Overdiagnosed? Yes: A Patient-Epidemiologist’s Experience
  • Medication-Assisted Treatment Should Be Part of Every Family Physician’s Practice: Yes
Show more Point/Counterpoint

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • patient care outcomes
  • health care quality assessment
  • assessment
  • outcomes (health care)

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine