Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Respiratory Tract Infections in Children in the Community: Prospective Online Inception Cohort Study

Alastair D. Hay, Emma Anderson, Sue Ingle, Charles Beck and William Hollingworth
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2019, 17 (1) 14-22; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2327
Alastair D. Hay
1Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
3NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
FRCGP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: alastair.hay@bristol.ac.uk
Emma Anderson
2Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
3NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
DHealthPsy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sue Ingle
3NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
4Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles Beck
3NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
5Field Epidemiology Service, Public Health England, Bristol, United Kingdom
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William Hollingworth
4Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Flow diagram of participant recruitment.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Kaplan-Meier curve showing time to RTI symptom resolution (with number censored), restricted to the first RTI in a family with illness start date recorded (n = 197).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Baseline Characteristics of Parents, Children, and Households, According to Whether or Not Symptom End Dates Were Recorded, and Restricted to the First RTI Episodes in a Family (n = 206)

    CharacteristicsFirst RTI Episodes (n = 206)Symptom End Dates Recorded?
    No (n = 26)Yes (n = 180)
    Parents
    Sex, No. (%)
     Missing2 (0.97)
     Female193 (93.69)26 (100.00)167 (93.82)
     Male11 (5.34)0 (0.00)11 (6.18)
    Age, median (IQR), y38 (34-43)36 (34-41)38 (34-43)
    Ethnicity, No. (%)
     Missing9 (4.37)
     Asian5 (2.43)0 (0.00)5 (2.91)
     Black5 (2.43)2 (8.00)3 (1.74)
     Mixed5 (2.43)1 (4.00)4 (2.33)
     White182 (88.35)22 (88.00)160 (93.02)
    Employment, No. (%)
     Missing9 (4.37)
     Full-time parent/caregiver34 (16.50)4 (16.00)30 (17.44)
     In full-time education2 (0.97)0 (0.00)2 (1.16)
     Not currently employed8 (3.88)2 (8.00)6 (3.49)
     Working full time41 (19.90)7 (28.00)34 (19.77)
     Working part time112 (54.37)12 (48.00)100 (58.14)
    Education, No. (%)
     Missing9 (4.37)
     No official qualification2 (0.97)0 (0.00)2 (1.16)
     Up to GCSEs/GCEs/O Levels or equivalent8 (3.88)4 (16.00)4 (2.33)
     A Levels/NVQs/GNVQs or equivalent9 (4.37)2 (8.00)7 (4.07)
     First degree/diploma/HNC/HND107 (51.94)11 (44.00)96 (55.81)
     Higher degree (eg, MSc, PhD)71 (34.47)8 (32.00)63 (36.63)
    Any medical/nursing training, No. (%)
     Missing9 (4.37)
     No155 (75.24)22 (88.00)133 (77.33)
     Yes42 (20.39)3 (12.00)39 (22.67)
    Children
    Age, (median, IQR), y3 (1-7)3 (1-6)3 (1-7)
    Sex, No. (%)
     Female114 (55.34)15 (57.69)99 (55.00)
     Male92 (44.66)11 (42.31)81 (45.00)
    Ethnicity, No. (%)
     Asian6 (2.91)1 (3.85)5 (2.78)
     Black5 (2.43)1 (3.85)4 (2.22)
     Mixed11 (5.34)3 (11.54)8 (4.44)
     White184 (89.32)21 (80.77)163 (90.56)
    Asthma, No. (%)
     No187 (90.78)22 (84.62)165 (91.67)
     Yes19 (9.22)4 (15.38)15 (8.33)
    Eczema, No. (%)
     No128 (62.14)18 (69.23)110 (61.11)
     Yes78 (37.86)8 (30.77)70 (38.89)
    Hay fever, No. (%)
     No186 (90.29)22 (84.62)164 (91.11)
     Yes20 (9.71)4 (15.38)16 (8.89)
    Child receiving any breast milk at 3 months, No. (%)
     Don’t know2 (0.97)1 (3.85)1 (0.56)
     No30 (14.56)4 (15.38)26 (14.44)
     Yes174 (84.47)21 (80.77)153 (85.00)
    Child attending school, No. (%)
     No125 (60.68)15 (57.69)110 (61.11)
     Yes81 (39.32)11 (42.31)70 (38.89)
    Child (not in school) attending daycare regularly, No. (%)
     Not relevant (attends school)81
     No36 (28.80)6 (40.00)30 (27.27)
     Yes (1-2 days per week)50 (40.00)6 (40.00)44 (40.00)
     Yes (3-5 days per week)39 (31.20)3 (20.00)36 (32.73)
    Households
    Bedrooms, No. (%)
     Missing9
     14 (2.03)2 (8.00)2 (1.16)
     247 (23.86)5 (20.00)42 (24.42)
     386 (43.65)9 (36.00)77 (44.77)
     442 (21.32)6 (24.00)36 (20.93)
     514 (7.11)3 (12.00)11 (6.40)
     63 (1.52)0 (0.00)3 (1.74)
     70 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)
     81 (0.51)0 (0.00)1 (0.58)
    Resident smoker, No. (%)
     Missing9
     No181 (91.88)22 (88.00)159 (92.44)
     Yes16 (8.12)3 (12.00)13 (7.56)
    Cat/dog in main home, No. (%)
     Missing9
     No141 (71.57)16 (64.00)125 (72.67)
     Yes56 (28.43)9 (36.00)47 (27.33)
    Number of adults resident in child’s main home, No. (%)
     Missing9
     01 (0.51)0 (0.00)1 (0.58)
     115 (7.61)2 (8.00)13 (7.56)
     2164 (83.25)20 (80.00)144 (83.72)
     311 (5.58)0 (0.00)11 (6.40)
     45 (2.54)3 (12.00)2 (1.16)
     81 (0.51)0 (0.00)1 (0.58)
    Total number of children in home, No. (%)
     Missing9
     180 (40.61)8 (32.00)72 (41.86)
     2103 (52.28)15 (60.00)88 (51.16)
     312 (6.09)1 (4.00)11 (6.40)
     41 (0.51)0 (0.00)1 (0.58)
     50 (0.00)1 (4.00)0 (0.00)
    Age of children in home, median (IQR), y3 (2-7)2 (1-6)3 (2-7)
    • A level = advanced level; GCE = general certificate of education; GCSE = general certificate of secondary education; GNVQ = general national vocational qualification; HNC = higher national certificate; HND = higher national diploma; IQR = interquartile range; MSc = master of science; NVQ = national vocational qualification; O level = general certificate of education ordinary level; PhD = doctor of philosophy; RTI = respiratory tract infection.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Duration and Severity of RTI Symptoms, Restricted to First RTI in a Family With Known Illness Start Date (n = 197)

    GroupNo.RTI Duration by Percentile, d P Valuea
    10th25th50th75th90th
    All children1974791423
    Children with and without consultationb
     Consultation1669131837.06
     No consultation1814691321
    Upper and lower RTI symptomsc,d
     Exclusively URTI863581115<.001
     Any LRTI10468121829.5
    Constitutional symptom severity scoree for upper and lower RTI, mean of maximum
    Upper RTILower RTI
    Fever0.551.07
    Fatigue0.831.71
    Disruption to sleep1.152.19
    Disruption to other activities0.671.43
    • LRTI = lower respiratory tract infection; NHS = National Health Service; RTI = respiratory tract infection; URTI = upper respiratory tract infection.

    • ↵a Log-rank test for difference between episodes with consultions and those without consultions.

    • ↵b Any NHS primary care attendance according to medical notes.

    • ↵c 7 RTI episodes which did not report any URTI- or LRTI-defining symptoms.

    • ↵d URTI symptoms: earache, sore throat, runny/blocked nose, ear discharge, dry cough or barking/croupy cough. LRTI symptoms: wet/productive cough, breathing faster/shortness of breath, or wheeze/whistling chest.

    • e Maximum of daily scores in first 21 days, based on Likert scale 0 (normal, no problem) to 6 (as bad as it could be).

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Effect of Deprivation/Baseline Characteristics on RTI Symptom Duration and Consultations, Restricted to First RTI in a Family With Illness Start Date (n = 197)

    CharacteristicNo.Consultation, No. (%)P ValueMedian Duration, dP Value
    Parent education level
     No official qualification20 (0.0)1
     GCSE/GCE/O level60 (0.0)14
     A level/NVQ/GNVQ91 (11.1).937.09
     First degree (diploma/HNC/HND)1059 (8.6)10
     Higher degree (MSc/PhD)675 (7.5)9
     Missing81 (12.5)7
    Age of child
     ≥3 years1069 (8.5).8711<.01
     >3 years917 (7.7)7
     Missing00 (0.0)0
    Household Index ofMultiple Deprivation
     1 (most deprived)745 (6.8)9
     2575 (8.8).839.79
     3 (least deprived)636 (9.5)9
     Missing30 (0.0)23
    • A level = advanced level; GCE = general certificate of education; GCSE = general certificate of secondary education; GNVQ = general national vocational qualification; HNC = higher national certificate; HND = higher national diploma; MSc = master of science; NVQ = national vocational qualification; O level = general certificate of education ordinary level; PhD = doctor of philosophy; RTI = respiratory tract infection.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Sensitivity Analyses for Overall RTI Duration and Duration Stratified by Child’s Consultation Attendancea

    GroupNo.RTI Duration by Percentile, d P Valueb
    10th25th50th75th90th
    Primary comparison (reference Table 2)
    First RTI in a family
     All1974791423.06
     Consultation1669131837
     Non Consultation1814691321
    Sensitivity analyses
    First RTI in a child
     All2464791423.05
     Consultation18611131837
    Non Consultation2284691421
    All RTIs
    All33847101526<.01
    Consultation34813142728
    Non Consultation3044691421
    • NHS = National Health Service; RTI = respiratory tract infection.

    • ↵a Any consultation attendance according to medical notes.

    • ↵b Log-rank test for difference between episodes with consultation and those with no consultation.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Appendixes

    Supplemental appendixes

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental data: Appendix - PDF file
  • The Article in Brief

    Respiratory Tract Infections in Children in the Community: Prospective Online Inception Cohort Study

    Alastair D. Hay , and colleagues

    Background Accurate knowledge of respiratory tract symptoms and their duration is an essential part of self-care, helping patients know when to seek help. This study uses novel online methods to estimate the duration of children's respiratory symptoms and the proportion of parents visiting primary care for those symptoms.

    What This Study Found It takes 23 days for 90 percent of children to recover from respiratory tract infection symptoms. Researchers followed 485 children in 331 families in Bristol, England as they fell ill with respiratory tract infections (n=197 respiratory tract infections). Overall, median duration of symptoms was 9 days. For children three years of age or younger, median symptom duration was 11 days compared to seven days for older children. Children whose parents reported lower respiratory tract symptoms (such as wet cough and wheeze) had median symptom duration of 12 days compared to eight days for those who had only upper respiratory tract symptoms (such as runny nose and sore throat). Among children with only upper respiratory tract symptoms, the most persistent symptom was runny nose, while the fastest symptom to resolve was earache. For children with at least one lower respiratory tract symptom, all symptoms persisted for three weeks; runny nose and wet cough were the most severe symptoms. One in 12 parents sought help from their family physician.

    Implications

    • These findings, the authors suggest, could inform primary care practice, public health interventions, and, ultimately, parents regarding the concerning symptoms for which they should consult their primary care physician.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 17 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 17 (1)
Vol. 17, Issue 1
January/February 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Respiratory Tract Infections in Children in the Community: Prospective Online Inception Cohort Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Respiratory Tract Infections in Children in the Community: Prospective Online Inception Cohort Study
Alastair D. Hay, Emma Anderson, Sue Ingle, Charles Beck, William Hollingworth
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2019, 17 (1) 14-22; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2327

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Respiratory Tract Infections in Children in the Community: Prospective Online Inception Cohort Study
Alastair D. Hay, Emma Anderson, Sue Ingle, Charles Beck, William Hollingworth
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2019, 17 (1) 14-22; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2327
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Respiratory Tract Pathogen Detection in Children: Clinical Practice and Considerations of mNGS and tNGS Technologies
  • Respiratory infections in children: an appropriateness study of when parents should home care or seek medical help
  • In This Issue: Humans of Primary Care Research
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Agile Implementation of a Digital Cognitive Assessment for Dementia in Primary Care
  • Authorship Inequity in Global Health Research Conducted in Low- and Middle-Income Countries and Published in High-Income Country Family Medicine Journals
  • Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing a Digital Cognitive Assessment for Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias in Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Acute illness
    • Disease pathophysiology / etiology
  • Person groups:
    • Children's health
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • Health services
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Access

Keywords

  • child
  • respiratory tract infections
  • primary health care
  • antibacterial agents

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine