Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

A New Comprehensive Measure of High-Value Aspects of Primary Care

Rebecca S. Etz, Stephen J. Zyzanski, Martha M. Gonzalez, Sarah R. Reves, Jonathan P. O’Neal and Kurt C. Stange
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2019, 17 (3) 221-230; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2393
Rebecca S. Etz
1Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good
2Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rebecca.etz@vcuhealth.org
Stephen J. Zyzanski
3Center for Community Health Integration, Departments of Family Medicine & Community Health, Population & Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martha M. Gonzalez
1Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good
2Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah R. Reves
1Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good
2Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
MSN, FNP-C
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan P. O’Neal
1Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good
2Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kurt C. Stange
1Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good
3Center for Community Health Integration, Departments of Family Medicine & Community Health, Population & Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
4Departments of General Medical Sciences and Sociology, and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1A
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1A

    Distribution of person-centered primary care measure scores in the combined online sample (n = 2,229).

  • Figure 1B
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1B

    Distribution of person-centered primary care measure scores in combined clinical sample (n = 323).

  • Figure 2A
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2A

    Rasch model for cross-validation of the online sample (n = 1,089).

    Notes: Bars under Person heading show distribution of person’s responses across the range of difficulty of the items. Numbers in parentheses after each Item heading show distribution and lack of redundancy of items across the range of difficulty. Not pictured: On Person side of map, mean = +0.7, 1 standard deviation = 1.8; on the Item side of the map, mean = 0, 1 standard deviation = 0.8

  • Figure 2B
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2B

    Rasch model for cross-validation of the clinical sample (n = 323).

    Notes: Bars under Person heading show distribution of person’s responses across the range of difficulty of the items. Numbers in parentheses after each Item heading show distribution and lack of redundancy of items across the range of difficulty. Not pictured: On Person side of map, mean = 1.80, 1 standard deviation = 1.20; on the Item side of the map, mean = 0.0, 1 standard deviation = 0.85.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Combined Study Samples and Characteristics

    Participant CharacteristicsOnline Samplea (n = 2,229), No. (%)Clinical Sampleb (n = 323), No. (%)
    Age, y
     18-29371 (18)28 (22)
     30-44578 (28)52 (41)
     45-60442 (21)31 (25)
     >60685 (33)15 (12)
    Sex
     Female1,109 (53)157 (69)
     Male967 (47)69 (31)
    Self-identify as minorityc
     Yes439 (20)
     No1,718 (80)
    Regionc
     Northeast414 (20)
     Midwest524 (26)
     South634 (31)
     West482 (23)
    Single physician for carec
     Yes1,751 (81)
     No406 (19)
    Years knowing physician
     <1155 (7)24 (12)
     1-3702 (33)80 (38)
     4-10697 (32)68 (32)
     >10611 (28)38 (18)
    Annual income,c $
     <25,000297 (17)
     25,000-49,999383 (22)
     >50,0001,071 (61)
    Device used c
     Desk/Laptop1,272 (57)
     Other957 (43)
    What Matters Index
     0315 (30)106 (53)
     1348 (33)57 (29)
     ≥2396 (37)37 (18)
    Patient Enablement Index
     0488 (22)23 (11)
     1-5543 (25)28 (13)
     6-11764 (35)81 (38)
     12386 (18)81 (38)
    • ↵a Online exploratory and validation samples.

    • ↵b In the Clinical Sample the survey was completed by consecutive samples of patients after visits at a community health center, independent and hospital-owned private family practices, and a pediatric hospital-owned practice.

    • ↵c Items were not included in the clinical sample questions fielded in conjunction with the measure.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Items and Statistics for Cross-validation Online and Combined Clinical Samples

    ItemCross-Validation Online Sample (n = 1,089)Combined Clinical Sample (n = 323)
    Mean (SD)Factor LoadingItem-Total CorrelationMean (SD)Factor LoadingItem-Total Correlation
    My practice makes it easy for me to get care.3.1 (0.9)0.740.713.7 (0.6)0.640.55
    My practice is able to provide most of my care.3.1 (0.9)0.740.713.8 (0.5)0.700.63
    In caring for me, my doctor considers all of the factors that affect my health.3.2 (0.9)0.850.833.8 (0.5)0.700.57
    My practice coordinates the care I get from multiple places.2.9 (1.1)0.760.733.6 (0.7)0.500.46
    My doctor or practice knows me as a person.2.8 (1.1)0.840.823.5 (0.8)0.550.55
    My doctor and I have been through a lot together.2.2 (1.1)0.670.662.8 (1.2)0.480.49
    My doctor or practice stands up for me.2.8 (1.0)0.860.833.5 (0.8)0.760.72
    The care I get takes into account knowledge of my family.2.7 (1.1)0.790.773.2 (0.8)0.670.61
    The care I get in this practice is informed by knowledge of my community.2.4 (1.1)0.700.693.2 (0.9)0.610.55
    Over time, this practice helps me to meet my goals.3.0 (1.0)0.870.843.7 (0.6)0.780.70
    Over time, my practice helps me stay healthy.2.8 (1.0)0.850.823.6 (0.6)0.740.65
    • View popup
    Table 3

    Demographic and Concurrent Validity Analyses for Combined Samples

    Validation ItemOnline Sample (n = 2,229)Clinical Sample (n = 323)
    No.Score, Mean (SD)PNo.Score, Mean (SD)P
    Age, y…….0001…….17
     18-293712.68 (0.80)283.67 (0.44)
     30-445782.61 (0.83)523.60 (0.46)
     45-604422.88 (0.76)313.41 (0.48)
     >606853.04 (0.71)153.59 (0.45)
    Sex…….22…….9
     Female1,1092.84 (0.79)1573.57 (0.45)
     Male9672.80 (0.80)693.56 (0.37)
    Self-identify as minoritya…….59
     Yes4392.81 (0.81)
     No1,7182.83 (0.79)
    Single physician for carea…….0001
     Yes1,7512.96 (0.72)
     No4062.28 (0.86)
    Years knowing physician…….0001…….13
     <11552.14 (0.87)243.38 (0.57)
     1-37022.64 (0.73)803.52 (0.47)
     4-106972.93 (0.72)683.54 (0.55)
     >106113.17 (0.68)383.69 (0.47)
    What Matters Index…….0001…….08
     03153.23 (0.56)1063.62 (0.39)
     13482.73 (0.87)573.47 (0.49)
     ≥23962.59 (0.82)373.63 (0.52)
    Device useda…….30
     Desk/Laptop1,2722.80 (0.78)
     Other8042.86 (0.81)
    Patient Enablement Index…….0001…….0001
     04881.94 (0.61)233.04 (0.76)
     1-55432.56 (0.57)283.25 (0.58)
     6-117643.15 (0.49)813.50 (0.44)
     123863.67 (0.39)813.78 (0.30)
    Annual income,a $…….002
     <25,0002972.70 (0.88)
     25,000-49,9993832.73 (0.80)
     >50,0001,0712.86 (0.77)
    Regiona…….12
     Northeast4142.81 (0.79)
     Midwest5242.89 (0.77)
     South6342.80 (0.84)
     West4822.79 (0.76)
    Survey hard to complete?a…….02
     Yes412.56 (0.86)
     No1,0572.84 (0.76)
    If your doctor had these survey results would it help your care?a…….0001
     Yes6703.00 (0.72)
     No4282.57 (0.77)
    • ↵a Items were not included in the clinical sample questions fielded in conjunction with the measure.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Appendix

    PDF file

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Adobe PDF - Etz_Supp_App.pdf
  • The Article in Brief

    A New Comprehensive Measure of High-Value Aspects of Primary Care

    Rebecca S. Etz , and colleagues

    Background There are a number of measures to assess aspects of primary care, but a new measure breaks new ground by combining experiences of patients, clinicians, and payers and allowing the most informed reporter--the patient--to assess vital primary care functions that are often missed.

    What This Study Found Researchers asked crowdsourced samples of 412 patients, 525 primary care clinicians, and 85 health care payers to describe what provides value in primary care, then asked 70 primary care and health services experts for additional insights. A multidisciplinary team analyzed these qualitative data to develop a set of patient-reported items. The resulting Person-Centered Primary Care Measure concisely represents the broad scope of primary care, with 11 domains each represented by a single item: accessibility, comprehensiveness, continuity, integration, coordination, relationship, advocacy, family context, community context, health promotion, and goal-oriented care. While existing measures evaluate the experience of care delivery based only on clinical processes and outcomes, the new measure focuses on care aspects that contribute to patient perceptions of the integrating, prioritizing, and personalizing functions of primary care.

    Implications

    • The ability to assess primary care as a whole and through the lens of the patient makes the Person-Centered Primary Care Measure both unique and meaningful, the authors state.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 17 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 17 (3)
Vol. 17, Issue 3
May/June 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A New Comprehensive Measure of High-Value Aspects of Primary Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
16 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A New Comprehensive Measure of High-Value Aspects of Primary Care
Rebecca S. Etz, Stephen J. Zyzanski, Martha M. Gonzalez, Sarah R. Reves, Jonathan P. O’Neal, Kurt C. Stange
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2019, 17 (3) 221-230; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2393

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
A New Comprehensive Measure of High-Value Aspects of Primary Care
Rebecca S. Etz, Stephen J. Zyzanski, Martha M. Gonzalez, Sarah R. Reves, Jonathan P. O’Neal, Kurt C. Stange
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2019, 17 (3) 221-230; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2393
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?
  • Development of the Tool for Advancing Practice Performance, a practice-level survey to assess primary care structures and processes
  • Dutch Translation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Person-Centered Primary Care Measure
  • Missing the person: Are preventive medicine and clinical practice guidelines contributing to physician burnout?
  • Omettre la personne: La medecine preventive et les lignes directrices de pratique clinique contribuent-elles a lepuisement professionnel des medecins?
  • Treatment burden in multiple long-term conditions: a mixed-methods study protocol
  • Time for Family Medicine to Stop Enabling a Dysfunctional Health Care System
  • How the Novel Person-Centered Primary Care Measure Performs in Canada
  • Clinical Quality Measures: A Challenge for-and to-Family Physicians
  • Measuring Primary Care Across 35 OECD Countries
  • Exploration of the psychometric properties of the Person-Centred Primary Care Measure (PCPCM) in a Chinese primary care population in Hong Kong: a cross-sectional validation study
  • Developing measures to capture the true value of primary care
  • Standardization vs Customization: Finding the Right Balance
  • Cultural adaptation and content validity of a Chinese translation of the "Person-Centered Primary Care Measure": findings from cognitive debriefing
  • Exploring the psychometric properties of the Working Alliance Inventory in general practice: a cross-sectional study
  • Protocol for an implementation and realist evaluation of a new organisational model for primary care practices in the canton of Vaud, Switzerland
  • Cultural adaptation and content validity of a Chinese translation of the 'Person-Centered Primary Care Measure: findings from cognitive debriefing
  • Assessing the Longitudinal Impact of Physician-Patient Relationship on Functional Health
  • Primary Care Is an Essential Ingredient to a Successful Population Health Improvement Strategy
  • Physical Distancing With Social Connectedness
  • In This Issue: Changing Prescriptions for Change
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
  • Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
    • Mixed methods
    • Cross-disciplinary
  • Other research types:
    • Professional practice
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Access
    • Continuity
    • Comprehensiveness
    • Coordination / integration of care
    • Personalized care
    • Relationship
  • Other topics:
    • Patient-centered medical home
    • Patient perspectives

Keywords

  • measurement
  • metrics
  • primary care
  • population health
  • quality

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine