Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleMethodology

Measuring Primary Care Across 35 OECD Countries

Stephen J. Zyzanski, Martha M. Gonzalez, Jonathan P. O’Neal, Rebecca S. Etz, Sarah R. Reves and Kurt C. Stange
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2021, 19 (6) 547-552; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2697
Stephen J. Zyzanski
1Center for Community Health Integration, Departments of Family Medicine & Community Health, Population & Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martha M. Gonzalez
2Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan P. O’Neal
2Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca S. Etz
2Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Rebecca.Etz@vcuhealth.org
Sarah R. Reves
2Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
FNP-C, MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kurt C. Stange
1Center for Community Health Integration, Departments of Family Medicine & Community Health, Population & Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
2Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
3Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Psychometric Properties and Evidence of Concurrent Validity for the PCPCM in 35 Countries

    CountryLanguageMean (SD)αItem-Total CorrYears MDYears With PracticeMD ResultsPEI CorrAgeSexaForm
    TurkeyTurkish3.08 (0.7)0.950.70-0.810.0001b0.0340.00010.74NSFNS
    GermanyGerman3.01 (0.62)0.90.57-0.710.0030.0040.0010.64NSNSNS
    United StatesEnglish2.99 (0.77)0.940.66-0.810.00010.00010.00010.69NSNSNS
    BelgiumDutch or French2.98 (0.63)0.90.53-0.72NSNS0.00010.57NSNSNS
    FranceFrench2.96 (0.69)0.910.57-0.740.0080.0140.00010.620.047NSNS
    LuxembourgLuxembourgish2.92 (0.64)0.880.55-0.65NSNSNS0.67NSNSNS
    AustriaAustrian2.92 (0.64)0.90.52-0.780.00010.00010.00010.69NSMNS
    AustraliaEnglish2.9 (0.7)0.930.61-0.790.00010.010.00010.7NSNSNS
    SwitzerlandGerman2.87 (0.63)0.90.50-0.69NS0.010.00010.62NSNSNS
    SpainSpanish2.87 (0.65)0.920.61-0.780.0001NS0.00010.74NSNSNS
    HungaryHungarian2.87 (0.72)0.920.47-0.800.009NS0.00010.63NSNSNS
    NorwayNorwegian2.85 (0.68)0.920.64-0.740.0080.0090.00010.67NSNSNS
    New ZealandEnglish2.82 (0.7)0.920.56-0.770.0010.0040.00010.62NSNSNS
    IrelandEnglish2.82 (0.69)0.910.57-0.740.005NS0.00010.68NSNSNS
    PortugalPortuguese2.8 (0.63)0.910.57-0.770.00010.0210.0030.67NSMNS
    MexicoSpanish2.78 (0.73)0.920.57-0.780.00010.00010.00010.68NSNSNS
    SloveniaSlovenian2.77 (0.72)0.930.61-0.760.0001NS0.00010.690.039NSNS
    ItalyItalian2.77 (0.77)0.940.54-0.820.0010.00010.00010.73NSMNS
    DenmarkDanish2.77 (0.69)0.910.52-0.770.00010.00010.00010.61NSNSNS
    LatviaLatvian2.76 (0.7)0.910.58-0.73NSNS0.00010.63NSNSNS
    NetherlandsDutch2.75 (0.69)0.920.52-0.76NSNS0.00010.59NSMNS
    CanadaEnglish2.75 (0.8)0.950.69-0.830.00010.00010.00010.72NSNSNS
    SlovakiaSlovak2.71 (0.69)0.910.54-0.730.0040.0050.00010.71NSNSNS
    EstoniaEstonian2.69 (0.66)0.90.53-0.77NSNS0.00010.570.03NSNS
    CzechCzech2.69 (0.64)0.90.51-0.71NSNS0.00010.68NSNSNS
    United KingdomEnglish2.61 (0.73)0.920.59-0.800.0001NS0.00010.71NSMNS
    IsraelHebrew2.61 (0.66)0.890.48-0.730.039NS0.00010.63NSNSNS
    FinlandFinnish2.56 (0.61)0.910.57-0.730.00010.0030.0010.680.001NSNS
    GreeceGreek2.54 (0.63)0.930.66-0.760.035NS0.0050.670.002NSNS
    PolandPolish2.52 (0.67)0.90.48-0.750.0001NS0.00010.68NSNSNS
    KoreaKorean2.5 (0.67)0.920.60-0.75NSNS0.00010.670.013NSNS
    LithuaniaLithuanian2.47 (0.66)0.890.47-0.730.0001NS0.00010.63NSNSNS
    JapanJapanese2.46 (0.67)0.940.69-0.840.00010.00010.00010.73NSNS0.0001
    ChileSpanish2.41 (0.76)0.920.56-0.770.00010.002NS0.730.02M0.04
    SwedenSwedish2.28 (0.74)0.930.67-0.800.00010.00010.00010.740.034MNS
    • Corr = correlation; Form = PCPCM correlation with whether the patient reported it was hard to complete the survey; MD Results = PCPCM correlation with patient report of whether the doctor knowing the results would improve their care; PEI–Cor = PCPCM correlation with score on the Patient Enablement Index; PCPCM = Person-Centered Primary Care Measure; Yrs MD = PCPCM correlation with number of years the patient had been with the physician; Yrs Pract = PCPCM correlation with number of years the patient had been with the practice.

    • Note: The Spanish and Portuguese translations were used with either European or Latin American versions, as appropriate to the country.

    • ↵a Significant sex differences, P values range from Turkey (<.0001) to Austria (0.034).

    • ↵b Bonferroni adjustment for multiple testing requires P <0.009 for associations to be significant within country.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Person-Centered Primary Care Item Scores by Country (Ranked by Total Score)

    CountryTotalQ1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9Q10Q11
    Turkey3.083.33.23.22.92.82.93.13.03.13.23.1
    Germany3.013.23.13.23.03.32.63.02.83.03.02.9
    United States2.993.13.13.23.03.02.52.82.92.93.23.0
    Belgium2.983.13.03.32.93.22.63.03.02.83.12.9
    France2.963.23.03.33.03.22.52.82.92.53.22.9
    Austria2.923.33.13.23.03.22.42.92.62.73.02.7
    Luxembourg2.923.33.03.12.93.02.52.92.72.73.12.8
    Australia2.903.13.13.33.03.02.52.82.82.73.02.8
    Spain2.873.23.03.33.02.92.22.82.72.73.02.8
    Hungary2.873.12.83.23.03.02.82.82.82.43.02.6
    Switzerland2.873.13.03.13.03.02.42.92.72.72.92.8
    Norway2.853.03.03.02.82.92.62.92.72.72.92.8
    Ireland2.823.13.03.22.72.92.42.82.82.52.92.7
    New Zealand2.823.03.13.22.92.82.32.82.72.52.92.7
    Portugal2.803.13.03.22.92.92.12.82.62.43.02.8
    Mexico2.783.13.13.22.72.82.22.52.72.53.02.7
    Denmark2.773.02.93.12.82.62.92.82.62.52.72.8
    Slovenia2.772.92.83.12.82.92.32.92.72.62.92.6
    Italy2.773.02.83.02.63.02.22.72.82.82.92.7
    Latvia2.763.02.73.02.92.82.62.62.72.52.92.6
    Canada2.752.92.93.02.72.82.42.72.72.52.92.7
    Netherlands2.752.92.83.02.72.82.22.82.82.72.82.7
    Slovak2.713.13.03.12.82.92.22.82.62.02.82.5
    Estonia2.693.02.93.12.92.62.42.72.52.52.72.4
    Czech2.693.23.03.22.82.71.82.82.62.42.82.3
    United Kingdom2.612.93.03.02.82.52.12.52.42.42.72.5
    Israel2.612.82.83.12.52.72.12.82.52.02.82.6
    Finland2.563.03.02.92.72.31.72.72.32.12.82.7
    Greece2.542.62.62.92.52.62.42.52.62.22.72.5
    Poland2.522.92.72.92.62.82.12.42.22.22.52.3
    Korea2.503.02.92.82.62.12.02.32.42.32.62.5
    Lithuania2.472.92.72.92.62.51.82.52.22.12.72.3
    Japan2.462.72.72.62.32.42.12.62.32.42.52.5
    Chile2.412.72.62.92.52.21.72.12.32.32.72.4
    Sweden2.282.82.72.62.52.01.82.11.82.02.42.3
    • Q[uestion]1 = My practice makes it easy for me to get care; Q2 = My practice is able to provide most of my care; Q3 = In caring for me, my doctor considers all the factors that affect my health; Q4 = My practice coordinates the care I get from multiple places; Q5 = My doctor or practice knows me as a person; Q6 = My doctor and I have been through a lot together; Q7 = My doctor or practice stands up for me; Q8 = The care I get takes into account knowledge of my family; Q9 = The care I get in this practice is informed by knowledge of community; Q10 = Over time, my practice helps me to stay healthy; Q11 = Over time, my practice helps me to meet my goals.

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • In brief

    Measuring Primary Care Across 35 OECD Countries

    Rebecca S. Etz and colleagues

    Background Researchers administered the Person-Centered Primary Care Measure in 28 languages to 35 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development countries to examine the reliability and validity of the measure and to explore the differences in primary care across 35 OECD countries. The PCPCM is an 11-item, patient-reported measure developed in 2017 to assess primary care qualities such as health care accessibility, advocacy, community context, family context, goal-oriented care, health promotion, integration and relationship. Survey constructs are based on what patients, clinicians and, to a lesser extent, payers say is most important to them in primary care.

    What This Study Found The PCPCM showed solid psychometric properties across all languages and countries, according to the study.

    Implications

    • The results provide evidence to primary care researchers that the PCPCM is able to collect data with high comparability, despite differences in geography, culture, or language. The authors encourage further ecological and individual data analyses of the PCPCM to learn about different approaches to health care across different countries.
      
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 19 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 19 (6)
Vol. 19, Issue 6
1 Nov 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Plain language article summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Measuring Primary Care Across 35 OECD Countries
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Measuring Primary Care Across 35 OECD Countries
Stephen J. Zyzanski, Martha M. Gonzalez, Jonathan P. O’Neal, Rebecca S. Etz, Sarah R. Reves, Kurt C. Stange
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2021, 19 (6) 547-552; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2697

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Measuring Primary Care Across 35 OECD Countries
Stephen J. Zyzanski, Martha M. Gonzalez, Jonathan P. O’Neal, Rebecca S. Etz, Sarah R. Reves, Kurt C. Stange
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2021, 19 (6) 547-552; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2697
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Dutch Translation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Person-Centered Primary Care Measure
  • Mode of Referral of Ovarian Cancer Patients: Does it Alter Treatment and Survival?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Joint Display of Integrated Data Collection for Mixed Methods Research: An Illustration From a Pediatric Oncology Quality Improvement Study
  • Patient-Guided Tours: A Patient-Centered Methodology to Understand Patient Experiences of Health Care
  • Putting Evidence Into Practice: An Update on the US Preventive Services Task Force Methods for Developing Recommendations for Preventive Services
Show more Methodology

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Person groups:
    • Community / population health
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods

Keywords

  • primary care
  • quantitative methods: health status/QOL measurement
  • measure development
  • international comparison

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine