Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleReflections

The Lost Pillar: Does Continuity of Care Still Matter?

David Loxterkamp
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2021, 19 (6) 553-555; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2736
David Loxterkamp
Northern Light Family Medicine Residency Program, Bangor, Maine
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: david.loxterkamp@gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • RE: Does Continuity Still Matter?
    William L Miller
    Published on: 23 January 2022
  • RE: Does Continuity Matter
    Andrew V Pasternak
    Published on: 12 December 2021
  • RE: Does Continuity Matter?
    JEAN M ANTONUCCI
    Published on: 11 November 2021
  • RE: continuity of care
    Jonathan R Dreazen
    Published on: 10 November 2021
  • Published on: (23 January 2022)
    Page navigation anchor for RE: Does Continuity Still Matter?
    RE: Does Continuity Still Matter?
    • William L Miller, Family Physician, Lehigh Valley Health Network

    When in times of vocational darkness, search for the hidden light. Remember purpose; connect with colleagues; share with patients. And, at least for me, visit the Oracle of Belfast. In these times, fortunately, the oracle has come to us with a warning about a lost pillar. Listen carefully, an abundance of light shines within its words. The future of our personal, generalist craft, of healing, is at risk.

    Everywhere, except in health systems, I hear about the loss of continuity with their family physician. My children and grandchild can’t find it anymore. My friends have lost it. Too many younger people never had it. They voice frustration and exasperation about always seeing someone different and no one ever knowing them or able to personalize their care and appreciate the uniqueness of their situation. Health systems respond by mandating greater access because it’s now a world of consumers and they want convenience, not continuity. Thank you, David, for waking us up, for quivering our hearts and souls, and calling us to care for our roots.

    Continuity of care, committing to a shared partnership with a patient over time, represents more than a fourth pillar. It functions as the foundation supporting the other three pillars of first contact access, coordination, and comprehensiveness. If we practice continuity, then we find ways to be present with our patients when they are in the hospital, birthing a baby, at the nursing home, in the emergency roo...

    Show More

    When in times of vocational darkness, search for the hidden light. Remember purpose; connect with colleagues; share with patients. And, at least for me, visit the Oracle of Belfast. In these times, fortunately, the oracle has come to us with a warning about a lost pillar. Listen carefully, an abundance of light shines within its words. The future of our personal, generalist craft, of healing, is at risk.

    Everywhere, except in health systems, I hear about the loss of continuity with their family physician. My children and grandchild can’t find it anymore. My friends have lost it. Too many younger people never had it. They voice frustration and exasperation about always seeing someone different and no one ever knowing them or able to personalize their care and appreciate the uniqueness of their situation. Health systems respond by mandating greater access because it’s now a world of consumers and they want convenience, not continuity. Thank you, David, for waking us up, for quivering our hearts and souls, and calling us to care for our roots.

    Continuity of care, committing to a shared partnership with a patient over time, represents more than a fourth pillar. It functions as the foundation supporting the other three pillars of first contact access, coordination, and comprehensiveness. If we practice continuity, then we find ways to be present with our patients when they are in the hospital, birthing a baby, at the nursing home, in the emergency room. Maybe no longer in charge of their care, but virtually checking in and monitoring. Our comprehensiveness expands. If we practice continuity, we make sure our patients have access, and we help navigate and assure that our patients are getting optimal coordinated care across the system. When we cease assuring continuity, the ability to keep the other three pillars standing diminishes.

    Dr. Loxtercamp identifies the culprit for our loss of continuity as our being “pulled into the orbit of mainstream medicine” and its episodic transactional care paradigm. True enough but there’s not enough of us. Continuity of care requires that there be sufficient access for existing patients and for everyone else in a community. That, in turn, requires a much larger and more diverse family medicine workforce than currently exists.

    David also comments that continuity can’t be offloaded and worries about our hiding our covenantal commitments to being there for patients inside the cover of teamwork. I agree this is too often the case, and we can’t and shouldn’t return to the paternalistic and not as great as they are often remembered days of the doctor doing it all. Continuity can’t be offloaded, but it can be shared among a small group. People have big enough hearts for a healing ensemble. But that ensemble needs to own its commitments and continually practice and refresh them. They need to guarantee regular meetings, to being there for each other as well as their shared patients, and to ensemble continuity. That will mean a greater commitment to practice staff retention and training and better compensation. And the teams need to stay small (3-5 people) which will require larger practices to organize into multiple ensembles.

    Does continuity of care still matter? It matters most of all. I encourage everyone to print Table one and put it in every exam room. Remember and advocate. Thank you, David. The oracle of Belfast has spoken. Pay heed!

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (12 December 2021)
    Page navigation anchor for RE: Does Continuity Matter
    RE: Does Continuity Matter
    • Andrew V Pasternak, Family Physician, Silver Sage Center for Family Medicine

    As a family physician in my early fifties who has cared for some of the same patients over 20 years, I wholeheartedly agree with Dr. Loxterkamp’s essay about the lost pillar of continuity. In addition to the issues that he spells out, we also need to address several additional barriers to continuity as a medical community.

    As he mentions, the culture of medicine has changed, and much change started at the administrative level. “Back in the day,” hospital and other health care administrators were people who grew up in their communities and remained a part of them. Now, like other industries, administrators bounce around from job to job. People living thousands of miles away make critical healthcare decisions for a community they are not a part of. These “leaders” will never personally feel the repercussions of those decisions, and their effects last longer than the administer does in their job position. As many hospital administrators have little continuity in their communities, that culture has unfortunately permeated down to the physician level.

    Another barrier to continuity is due to insurance coverage. Large healthcare systems prioritize the insurance plans tied to their hospital system and don’t contract with all available insurance plans in their community, including Medicaid. As insurance costs increase, employers will understandably change insurance plans for their employees to keep costs down. As a result, when I used to work for a healthcar...

    Show More

    As a family physician in my early fifties who has cared for some of the same patients over 20 years, I wholeheartedly agree with Dr. Loxterkamp’s essay about the lost pillar of continuity. In addition to the issues that he spells out, we also need to address several additional barriers to continuity as a medical community.

    As he mentions, the culture of medicine has changed, and much change started at the administrative level. “Back in the day,” hospital and other health care administrators were people who grew up in their communities and remained a part of them. Now, like other industries, administrators bounce around from job to job. People living thousands of miles away make critical healthcare decisions for a community they are not a part of. These “leaders” will never personally feel the repercussions of those decisions, and their effects last longer than the administer does in their job position. As many hospital administrators have little continuity in their communities, that culture has unfortunately permeated down to the physician level.

    Another barrier to continuity is due to insurance coverage. Large healthcare systems prioritize the insurance plans tied to their hospital system and don’t contract with all available insurance plans in their community, including Medicaid. As insurance costs increase, employers will understandably change insurance plans for their employees to keep costs down. As a result, when I used to work for a healthcare system, due to decisions by an executive or a patient’s employer, I found myself out of network and unable to continue to see my patients. In my current position with a small, independent practice, we often get left out of “premier” plans that funnel patients towards employed physicians associated with the health plan. It is frustrating that many family physicians want to continue to care for our patients, but insurance companies tie our hands.

    Finally, I worry about how much physician burnout plays a role in eroding patient continuity. A few years ago, I was at a seminar on physician burnout led by a non-physician. She wanted us to think about how people would talk about us as physicians when we retire or at our funeral. She seemed somewhat shocked when I (who was likely some mild suffering burnout at that point) commented that the same things I want to be remembered for may contribute to burnout. While patients appreciate me always being available, always saying yes, and always being willing to see their friends and family as new patients, this ultimately creates additional work stress. If we could eliminate the nonsensical busy work and data entry that physicians are now being forced to do, more physicians would be willing to focus on developing meaningful patient relationships. Unfortunately, many physicians suffering burnout and working in dysfunctional systems, their only options are to say no to this additional work or ultimately leave their practice. Both of these options, however, damage the continuity we should strive for in primary care.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (11 November 2021)
    Page navigation anchor for RE: Does Continuity Matter?
    RE: Does Continuity Matter?
    • JEAN M ANTONUCCI, physician, Northern Light

    No, Dr. Loxterkamp, continuity does not matter, not to those who run health care (which we as docs have allowed to be run mostly by hospitals), no matter their nice words and slick ads. Nor does access or advocacy matter. I work across the state in the foothills of Maine, where for over 15 years I saw everyone the day they called and was on time for appointments. They saw me and only me. Now I may work (one day a week) in the same system as you. I do acutes and MAT. I work with fabulous people, but in a place so inefficient that, with all sorts of layers of staff, I still see the same number of folks I saw when I did it myself. We cover for the other two practices in the network. One NP has no openings till April. I work for Teladoc also, and no one can ever get an appointment—they may not even have a doc at all. The reasons are the ones you know. Doctors have been silent, and now, employed by complex health care systems, they have no idea why things went wrong. They are so shielded. In my former system, a recent survey said 62% of docs were indifferent. We have let hospitals systems make processes difficult. We have put up with multiple websites to do referrals—often to people WE as PCPs are getting paid; we cannot be gatekeepers to XRT for breast cancer, but I must "refer" patients on my dime. Doctors are unwilling to actually DO anything, even if they knew what they could do. Some of us write a bit, but we are watching a society in decline, a pretty little pla...

    Show More

    No, Dr. Loxterkamp, continuity does not matter, not to those who run health care (which we as docs have allowed to be run mostly by hospitals), no matter their nice words and slick ads. Nor does access or advocacy matter. I work across the state in the foothills of Maine, where for over 15 years I saw everyone the day they called and was on time for appointments. They saw me and only me. Now I may work (one day a week) in the same system as you. I do acutes and MAT. I work with fabulous people, but in a place so inefficient that, with all sorts of layers of staff, I still see the same number of folks I saw when I did it myself. We cover for the other two practices in the network. One NP has no openings till April. I work for Teladoc also, and no one can ever get an appointment—they may not even have a doc at all. The reasons are the ones you know. Doctors have been silent, and now, employed by complex health care systems, they have no idea why things went wrong. They are so shielded. In my former system, a recent survey said 62% of docs were indifferent. We have let hospitals systems make processes difficult. We have put up with multiple websites to do referrals—often to people WE as PCPs are getting paid; we cannot be gatekeepers to XRT for breast cancer, but I must "refer" patients on my dime. Doctors are unwilling to actually DO anything, even if they knew what they could do. Some of us write a bit, but we are watching a society in decline, a pretty little planet being destroyed. Health care is a house of cards where every entity is out for themselves and the big eat the small and access? Continuity? No. No, it does not matter really.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (10 November 2021)
    Page navigation anchor for RE: continuity of care
    RE: continuity of care
    • Jonathan R Dreazen, Family Physician practicing occupational medicine, worknet occupational medicine

    I am in my 42nd year of practice. When I was in my residency in the late '70s, we were told that our great virtue in family medicine was in fact continuity of care and knowing all members in the family unit which would benefit our treatment of all. I have had the honor of taking care of newborns and their at time their children. I have been able to take care of grandparents, parents, children and grandchildren. We are jacks of all trades but masters of continuity and the understanding that comes from the care of all in the family. I pray that future generations of our specialty will have the same privilege and will understand the value of it!

    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 19 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 19 (6)
Vol. 19, Issue 6
1 Nov 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Plain language article summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Lost Pillar: Does Continuity of Care Still Matter?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
16 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Lost Pillar: Does Continuity of Care Still Matter?
David Loxterkamp
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2021, 19 (6) 553-555; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2736

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
The Lost Pillar: Does Continuity of Care Still Matter?
David Loxterkamp
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2021, 19 (6) 553-555; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2736
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • What Humans Need
  • Juste un generaliste?
  • Just a GP?
  • Continuity in the age of virtual care
  • Trust and Relationships Remain at the Heart of Primary Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • When the Death of a Colleague Meets Academic Publishing: A Call for Compassion
  • Let’s Dare to Be Vulnerable: Crossing the Self-Disclosure Rubicon
  • The Soundtrack of a Clinic Day
Show more Reflections

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Person groups:
    • Community / population health
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Continuity
    • Personalized care
    • Relationship

Keywords

  • continuity of care
  • relationship
  • residency training

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine