Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research From PBRNS

How Many Problems Do Family Physicians Manage at Each Encounter? A WReN Study

John W. Beasley, Terry H. Hankey, Rodney Erickson, Kurt C. Stange, Marlon Mundt, Marguerite Elliott, Pamela Wiesen and James Bobula
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2004, 2 (5) 405-410; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.94
John W. Beasley
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Terry H. Hankey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rodney Erickson
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kurt C. Stange
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marlon Mundt
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marguerite Elliott
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pamela Wiesen
MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Bobula
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

PURPOSE The number of problems managed concurrently by family physicians during patient encounters has not been fully explored despite the implications for quality assessment, guideline implementation, education, research, administration, and funding. Our study objective was to determine the number of problems physicians report managing at each visit and compare that with the number reflected in the chart and the bill.

METHODS Twenty-nine members of the Wisconsin Research Network reported on encounters with 572 patients using a physician problem log. The patient chart notes and the diagnoses submitted for billing from the encounters were compared with the information in these logs.

RESULTS The physicians reported managing an average of 3.05 problems per encounter and recorded 2.82 in the chart and 1.97 on the bill. For all patients, 37% of encounters addressed more than 3 problems, and 18% addressed more than 4. For patients older than 65 years, there was an average of 3.88 problems at each visit, and for diabetic patients there was an average of 4.60. There was evidence for the selective omission of mental health and substance problems from the diagnoses used for billing.

CONCLUSIONS Family medicine involves the concurrent care of multiple problems, which billing data do not adequately reflect. Our findings suggest a mismatch between family medicine and current approaches to quality assessment, guideline implementation, education, research, administration, and funding. Activities in all these areas need to address the physician’s task of prioritizing and integrating care for multiple problems concurrently.

  • Family medicine
  • family practice
  • comprehensive health care
  • documentation
  • professional practice
  • physician’s practice patterns
  • delivery of health care
  • © 2004 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 2 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 2 (5)
Vol. 2, Issue 5
1 Sep 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • The Issue in Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How Many Problems Do Family Physicians Manage at Each Encounter? A WReN Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
How Many Problems Do Family Physicians Manage at Each Encounter? A WReN Study
John W. Beasley, Terry H. Hankey, Rodney Erickson, Kurt C. Stange, Marlon Mundt, Marguerite Elliott, Pamela Wiesen, James Bobula
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2004, 2 (5) 405-410; DOI: 10.1370/afm.94

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
How Many Problems Do Family Physicians Manage at Each Encounter? A WReN Study
John W. Beasley, Terry H. Hankey, Rodney Erickson, Kurt C. Stange, Marlon Mundt, Marguerite Elliott, Pamela Wiesen, James Bobula
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2004, 2 (5) 405-410; DOI: 10.1370/afm.94
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Family medicine teaching strategy for managing patients with comorbidity: Collect, cluster, and coordinate
  • Strategie denseignement pour la prise en charge des patients presentant des comorbidites en medecine de famille: Collecte, agregation et coordination
  • Unrecognised depression among older people: a cross-sectional study from Norwegian general practice
  • Association of Telehealth with Short-Interval Follow-Up
  • Diagnoses per Encounter by Telephone, Televideo, and In-Office Visits
  • Changing Reasons for Visiting Primary Care Over a 35-Year Period
  • Clustering and Healthcare Costs With Multiple Chronic Conditions in a US Cross-Sectional Study
  • Much to do with nothing: microsimulation study on time management in primary care
  • Family medicine, fast and slow
  • Revisiting Primary Care's Critical Role in Achieving Health Equity: Pisacano Scholars' Reflections from Starfield Summit II
  • The Full Scope of Family Physicians Work Is Not Reflected by Current Procedural Terminology Codes
  • In This Issue: Powerful Ideas for Action
  • Burden of common mental disorders in a community health centre sample
  • A Primary Care Panel Size of 2500 Is neither Accurate nor Reasonable
  • Capturing the complexity of first opinion small animal consultations using direct observation
  • An Argument for Comprehensiveness as the "Special Sauce" in a Recipe for the Patient-Centered Medical Home
  • The content of general practice consultations: cross-sectional study based on video recordings
  • Estimating the Population Prevalence of Diagnosed and Undiagnosed Diabetes
  • Overwhelmed Patients: A videographic analysis of how patients with type 2 diabetes and clinicians articulate and address treatment burden during clinical encounters
  • Information Chaos in Primary Care: Implications for Physician Performance and Patient Safety
  • Comparison of the accuracy of patients' recall of the content of telephone and face-to-face consultations: an exploratory study
  • Does the evidence referenced in NICE guidelines reflect a primary care population?
  • Family Medicine Outpatient Encounters are More Complex Than Those of Cardiology and Psychiatry
  • Impact of EHR-Based Clinical Decision Support on Adherence to Guidelines for Patients on NSAIDs: A Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Primary Care: Current Problems And Proposed Solutions
  • Savoir que nous exercons une bonne medecine: Mise en aeuvre des dossiers medicaux electroniques en pratique familiale
  • Primary care physicians' experiences with electronic medical records: Implementation experience in community, urban, hospital, and academic family medicine
  • Knowing we practise good medicine: Implementing the electronic medical record in family practice
  • State of the Science: Promoting Self-Care in Persons With Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
  • A Science of Connectedness
  • How Often Do Physicians Address Other Medical Problems While Providing Prenatal Care?
  • Confronting The Growing Burden Of Chronic Disease: Can The U.S. Health Care Workforce Do The Job?
  • Perceived Complexity of Care, Perceived Autonomy, and Career Satisfaction Among Primary Care Physicians
  • The Medical Home: Growing Evidence to Support a New Approach to Primary Care
  • Global Health and Primary Care Research
  • Is 'Clinical Inertia' Blaming Without Understanding? Are Competing Demands Excuses?
  • In This Issue: Doctor-Patient and Drug Company-Patient Communication
  • Describing Primary Care Encounters: The Primary Care Network Survey and the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey
  • Behavior-Change Action Plans in Primary Care: A Feasibility Study of Clinicians
  • Randomized Controlled Trials: Do They Have External Validity for Patients With Multiple Comorbidities?
  • Practice-Based Research in Primary Care: Facilitator of, or Barrier to, Practice Improvement?
  • Is There Time for Management of Patients With Chronic Diseases in Primary Care?
  • In this Issue: The Patient-Clinician Relationship and Practice-Based Network Research
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comfortably Engaging: Which Approach to Alcohol Screening Should We Use?
  • Prevalence and Predictors of Night Sweats, Day Sweats, and Hot Flashes in Older Primary Care Patients: An OKPRN Study
Show more Original Research From PBRNS

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • PBRN research
    • Professional practice
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Comprehensiveness
  • Other topics:
    • Multimorbidity

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine