Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleMethodology From PBRNS

Rapid Assessment of Agents of Biological Terrorism: Defining the Differential Diagnosis of Inhalational Anthrax Using Electronic Communication in a Practice-Based Research Network

Jonathan L. Temte and Anna Lisa Anderson
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2004, 2 (5) 434-437; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.120
Jonathan L. Temte
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Lisa Anderson
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Training for Public Health Preparedness
    Jonathan L. Temte
    Published on: 10 October 2004
  • the generalizability question (again)
    Frederick M Chen
    Published on: 10 October 2004
  • The Role of Family Physicians and Practice Based Research Networks in Early Detection of Bioterrorist Agents and Emerging Infections
    Walter L. Calmbach
    Published on: 06 October 2004
  • Published on: (10 October 2004)
    Page navigation anchor for Training for Public Health Preparedness
    Training for Public Health Preparedness
    • Jonathan L. Temte, Madison, WI

    To the Editor:

    As noted by Dr. Calmbach, family physicians need significantly more training in public health preparedness. Such training, ideally, would not only encompasses response to bioterrorism, but also to more likely events such as naturally emerging infections (e.g., SARS, pandemic influenza), natural disasters (e.g., hurricanes, tornados), and healthcare delivery problems (e.g., hospital closures, vac...

    Show More

    To the Editor:

    As noted by Dr. Calmbach, family physicians need significantly more training in public health preparedness. Such training, ideally, would not only encompasses response to bioterrorism, but also to more likely events such as naturally emerging infections (e.g., SARS, pandemic influenza), natural disasters (e.g., hurricanes, tornados), and healthcare delivery problems (e.g., hospital closures, vaccine shortages). In all these realms, connectivity and ready access to information can be essential to individual and public health.

    Great progress is being made on the information technology front as applied to biodefense. For example, the National Electronic Data Surveillance System can provide early warning of health events based on geographical and temporal clusters of similar cases. As shown in our studies [1,2], however, information technology must be coupled with an understanding of the practice patterns and sensibilities of clinicians generating electronic medical data given the complexity of generating a diagnosis. Furthermore, electronic data is devoid of the richness of contextual information. Accordingly, there will continue to be needs for networks of sentinel clinicians.

    Practice-based research networks have a significant role in responding to new and emerging health threats. By virtue of exposure to and experience with systematic data collection, connectivity and cooperative effort, PBRNs provide ideal venues to conduct short-term surveillance, to rapidly test training and response protocols, and to assess the role of “just-in-time” sources of information.

    Jonathan L. Temte, MD/PhD Associate Professor of Family Medicine

    (1)Temte JL, Anderson AL. Rapid Assessment of Agents of Biological Terrorism: Defining the Differential Diagnosis of Inhalational Anthrax Using Electronic Communication in a Practice-Based Research Network. Ann Fam Med 2004;2:434-437. (2)Temte JL, Zinkel AR. The Primary Care Differential Diagnosis of Inhalational Anthrax. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:438-444.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (10 October 2004)
    Page navigation anchor for the generalizability question (again)
    the generalizability question (again)
    • Frederick M Chen, Seattle, Washington

    This article raises 2 issues about PBRN generazlizability for this timely topic of bioterrorism preparedness. On the one hand, I wonder whether we really need yet another study that demonstrates that PBRN physicians and data collected from them is as good, if not better, than random samples of practicing physicians.

    On the other hand, there will always be nagging questions that arise for any research methodolo...

    Show More

    This article raises 2 issues about PBRN generazlizability for this timely topic of bioterrorism preparedness. On the one hand, I wonder whether we really need yet another study that demonstrates that PBRN physicians and data collected from them is as good, if not better, than random samples of practicing physicians.

    On the other hand, there will always be nagging questions that arise for any research methodologist who wonders if these PBRN physicians are really like 'regular' family doctors out there in practice.

    This study raises valid points that in the case of, say, bioterrorism research, where rapid response and timely answers to pressing questions are vital, the value of PBRN physicians answering email surveys outweighs concerns about validity. Using the same argument, though, you can see the need for the answers to these questions to be valid and representative for the population of primary care physicians who are on the front line.

    Policymakers will not be concerned much with details of study design and validity. Instead, answers that guide their decision-making, or even better, support the decisions they've already made, will be most useful.

    I don't doubt that these findings are valid and relevant. But researchers should continue to be wary of the trade-offs that occur when research is asked to answer timely, real world questions.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (6 October 2004)
    Page navigation anchor for The Role of Family Physicians and Practice Based Research Networks in Early Detection of Bioterrorist Agents and Emerging Infections
    The Role of Family Physicians and Practice Based Research Networks in Early Detection of Bioterrorist Agents and Emerging Infections
    • Walter L. Calmbach, San Antonio, Texas, USA

    The article by Temte and Anderson in this month’s Annals makes an important contribution to our understanding of the role of family physicians in detecting and recognizing illnesses that may be due to chemical or biological bioterrorism (1). The terrorsist attack on September 11, 2001, and the subsequent unsolved anthrax attacks, made bioterrorism preparedness a national priority. As weapons, bacterial pathogens are rel...

    Show More

    The article by Temte and Anderson in this month’s Annals makes an important contribution to our understanding of the role of family physicians in detecting and recognizing illnesses that may be due to chemical or biological bioterrorism (1). The terrorsist attack on September 11, 2001, and the subsequent unsolved anthrax attacks, made bioterrorism preparedness a national priority. As weapons, bacterial pathogens are relatively easily obtained, prepared, and dispersed. Unfortunately, most US physicians have never encountered most of these agents and the diseases they produce. To prepare for this threat, several issues must be addressed: physician training, greater use of information technology, and further PBRN research.

    Training: Family physicians will be the sentinel responders to any putative bioterrorist attack, However, a survey of family physicians found that only 27% believed that the US health care system was adequately prepared for such an attack (2). Twenty six percent felt that they knew what to do in the event of a bioterrorist attack, and only 18% had previous training in bioterrorism preparedness. Family physicians need more training in bioterrorism preparedness and better access to public health and medical information. Public health programs must be designed and implemented so that primary care physicians are prepared to recognize, diagnose, and treat illness caused by these agents (3)

    Information Technology: Great Britain has experimented with using their primary care offices as a sentinel practice network (4). They used computerized medical records to track working diagnoses and calculate weekly incidence rates for 13 targeted conditions. Greater use of EMR’s in this country could help track rare and emerging conditions as well. Likewise, the internet holds promise for disseminating valid information quickly and efficiently to patients and the public (5). PBRN’s need an electronic infrastructure that promotes enhanced communication, decision support for physicians and practices, data warehousing, and rapid integration of new findings into daily practice.

    Further PBRN Research: Future research projects will require greater cooperation among PBRN’s, as well as leadership from the AAFP National Network and the Federation of PBRN’s. Studies must be designed to train and test PBRN physicians on the most likely threats: smallpox, anthrax, plague, botulism, tularemia, viral hemorrhagic fever. An online clearinghouse of methods and resources should be made available to all PBRN’s. Family physicians and practice-based research networks must take the lead and prepare for the threat of bioterrorism and emerging infections.

    1. Temte JL, Anderson AL. Rapid assessment of agents of biological terrorism: defining the differential diagnosis of inhalational anthrax using electronic communication in a practice- based research network. Ann Fam Med 2004;2: 434-437.

    2. Chen FM, Hickner J, Fink KS, Galliher JM, Burstin H. On the front lines: family physicians' preparedness for bioterrorism. J Fam Pract 2002; 51(9): 745-50.

    3. Hodgkin P, Perrett K. The role of primary care in bioterrorism, epidemics and other major emergencies: failing to plan is planning to fail. Brit J Gen Pract 2003; 53(486): 5-6.

    4. Fleming DM, Barley MA, Chapman RS. Surveillance of the bioterrorist threat: a primary care response. Communicable Disease & Public Health 2004; 7(1): 68-72.

    5. Kittler AF, Hobbs J, Volk LA, Kreps GL, Bates DW. The Internet as a vehicle to communicate health information during a public health emergency: a survey analysis involving the anthrax scare of 2001. J Med Internet Res 2004; 6(1): e8.

    ***

    Online Resources:

    AHRQ: http://www.bioterrorism-uab.ahrq.gov

    CDC: http://www.bt.cdc.gov

    FDA: http://www.fda.gov/cber/cntrbio/cntrbio.htm

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 2 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 2 (5)
Vol. 2, Issue 5
1 Sep 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • The Issue in Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rapid Assessment of Agents of Biological Terrorism: Defining the Differential Diagnosis of Inhalational Anthrax Using Electronic Communication in a Practice-Based Research Network
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Rapid Assessment of Agents of Biological Terrorism: Defining the Differential Diagnosis of Inhalational Anthrax Using Electronic Communication in a Practice-Based Research Network
Jonathan L. Temte, Anna Lisa Anderson
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2004, 2 (5) 434-437; DOI: 10.1370/afm.120

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Rapid Assessment of Agents of Biological Terrorism: Defining the Differential Diagnosis of Inhalational Anthrax Using Electronic Communication in a Practice-Based Research Network
Jonathan L. Temte, Anna Lisa Anderson
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2004, 2 (5) 434-437; DOI: 10.1370/afm.120
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • New Method for Real Time Influenza Surveillance in Primary Care: A Wisconsin Research and Education Network (WREN) Supported Study
  • Electronic Data Collection Options for Practice-Based Research Networks
  • In this Issue: The Patient-Clinician Relationship and Practice-Based Network Research
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • How and Why to Study the Practice Content of a Practice-Based Research Network
  • Opportunities, Challenges, and Lessons of International Research in Practice-Based Research Networks: The Case of an International Study of Acute Otitis Media
Show more Methodology From PBRNS

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Acute illness
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • PBRN research
  • Other topics:
    • Health informatics
    • Research capacity building

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine