Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Age-Related Disparities in Cancer Screening: Analysis of 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data

Anthony F. Jerant, Peter Franks, J. Elizabeth Jackson and Mark P. Doescher
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2004, 2 (5) 481-487; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.118
Anthony F. Jerant
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Franks
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Elizabeth Jackson
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark P. Doescher
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Adjusted Predicted Cancer Screening, by Age-Group

    Age-GroupCRC % (SE)PSA % (SE)Mammograph% (SE)y
    Note: adjusted for age-group, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, insurance status, and self-rated health.
    CRC = colorectal cancer screening (fecal occult blood test <2 years, or flexible sigmoidoscopy <5 years and/or colonoscopy <10 years); PSA = screening prostate specific antigen screening <2 years; mammography = mammography screening <2 years; SE = standard error.
    50-54 y40.3 (0.6)52.4 (1.0)78.6 (1.1)
    55-59 y52.8 (0.7)65.5 (1.1)83.3 (1.2)
    60-64 y58.5 (0.8)70.4 (1.2)80.5 (1.3)
    65-69 y63.1 (0.8)76.0 (1.2)80.7 (1.3)
    70-74 y66.0 (0.8)77.7 (1.0)77.9 (1.5)
    75-79 y65.6 (0.8)79.3 (1.1)77.1 (1.5)
    ≥ 80 y60.4 (0.9)71.8 (1.4)65.7 (1.8)
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Adjusted Predicted Prostate Cancer Screening, by Age-Group and Self-Rated Health

    Age-GroupExcellent % (SE)Very Good % (SE)Good % (SE)Fair % (SE)Poor % (SE)
    Note: adjusted for age-group, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, insurance status, and self-rated health. SE = standard error.
    50-54 y51.1 (2.0)49.1 (1.7)53.7 (1.7)55.3 (2.8)58.7 (4.0)
    55-59 y60.6 (2.5)65.9 (1.8)66.4 (1.9)67.7 (3.0)71.9 (3.5)
    60-64 y69.7 (2.4)69.2 (2.3)69.0 (2.2)74.0 (2.6)73.1 (3.3)
    65-69 y69.5 (4.3)79.4 (1.8)75.0 (1.8)78.0 (2.5)78.9 (3.0)
    70-74 y72.9 (3.2)78.7 (1.9)79.7 (1.6)78.3 (2.7)74.0 (3.1)
    75-79 y78.1 (3.4)79.7 (2.4)81.3 (1.7)79.5 (2.2)74.6 (3.5)
    ≥ 80 y79.6 (3.5)75.2 (2.6)71.9 (2.4)69.6 (3.0)68.9 (4.4)
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Adjusted Predicted Cancer Screening, by Age-Group and Race/Ethnicity

    Age-GroupWhite % (SE)African American % (SE)Other Race % (SE)Multi-Race % (SE)Hispanic % (SE)Refused % (SE)
    Note: adjusted for age group, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, insurance status, and self-rated health.
    CRC = colorectal cancer screening (fecal occult blood test <2 years, or flexible sigmoidoscopy <5 years and/or colonoscopy <10 years); PSA = screening prostate-specific antigen screening <2 years; mammography screening <2 years; SE = standard error.
    Colorectal cancer screening
    50-54 y40.4 (0.6)43.2 (2.2)34.2 (3.9)38.1 (4.6)36.0 (2.5)45.4 (6.2)
    55-59 y52.6 (0.7)63.1 (2.5)39.1 (4.6)64.1 (4.6)48.0 (3.5)51.5 (6.8)
    60-64 y60.5 (0.8)60.8 (3.0)43.9 (4.8)55.2 (5.9)44.6 (3.9)63.7 (6.5)
    65-69 y65.2 (0.8)62.3 (2.8)45.6 (6.4)56.8 (5.9)52.2 (3.8)66.3 (5.8)
    70-74 y68.4 (0.8)59.2 (3.3)56.5 (8.1)62.1 (6.6)54.2 (4.0)44.2 (7.0)
    75-79 y67.0 (0.9)60.1 (4.0)53.8 (8.0)66.3 (6.3)66.1 (4.7)44.6 (7.8)
    ≥80 y62.3 (0.9)52.1 (4.4)41.5 (6.6)67.2 (7.7)54.9 (6.5)50.1 (6.1)
    Prostate-specific antigen screening
    50-54 y50.5 (1.0)67.8 (3.1)43.2 (5.6)44.7 (6.5)58.2 (3.9)61.0 (8.9)
    55-59 y64.5 (1.1)77.3 (3.2)49.3 (7.4)63.5 (7.3)70.9 (4.5)68.2 (7.3)
    60-64 y71.6 (1.1)76.7 (4.1)60.7 (6.0)63.7 (7.9)62.2 (6.3)68.0 (9.6)
    65-69 y77.5 (1.0)75.3 (4.1)54.6 (9.7)66.1 (7.9)74.4 (5.5)78.4 (6.1)
    70-74 y78.9 (1.0)72.8 (4.6)67.1 (6.7)77.6 (7.8)72.0 (7.0)79.0 (7.0)
    75-79 y80.3 (1.1)78.9 (4.4)79.3 (7.3)75.0 (9.2)66.2 (6.7)50.6 10.8)
    ≥ 80 y71.9 (1.5)70.6 (8.2)68.4 (8.3)74.3 (9.2)76.2 (6.6)58.0 (11.2)
    Mammography screening
    50-54 y77.5 (1.4)85.3 (2.3)67.7 (6.0)75.2 (7.6)88.6 (3.1)59.1 (20.2)
    55-59 y82.4 (1.4)90.7 (2.2)81.4 (5.7)75.8 (6.6)83.2 (5.4)91.5 (9.5)
    60-64 y78.8 (1.5)87.0 (3.5)84.7 (4.7)91.7 (4.7)83.5 (4.9)93.2 (4.4)
    65-69 y79.8 (1.5)87.3 (3.0)84.1 (6.2)86.7 (5.8)79.9 (7.5)64.1 (20.8)
    70-74 y77.6 (1.6)83.7 (4.1)75.0 (6.0)54.7 (8.3)74.5 (8.3)82.3(10.8)
    75-79 y75.8 (1.7)89.0 (3.0)71.3 (7.8)53.8 (8.8)81.4 (6.7)88.9 (7.7)
    ≥ 80 y66.0 (1.9)60.5 (8.1)58.0 (8.8)53.9 (1.9)69.7 (9.3)69.8 (12.8)

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • Supplemental Table and Figure

    Supplemental Table: Screening by population characteristics of persons aged 50 to 80 or more years responding to the 2001 behavioral risk factor surveillance system questionnaire; Supplemental Figure: Adjusted predicted cancer screening, by age-group and sex.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental data: Table - PDF file, 2 pages, 70 KB
    • Supplemental data: Figure - PDF file, 1 page, 73 KB
  • The Article in Brief

    An examination of 3 cancer-screening tests shows that such tests may be underused or overused based on age. Abnormal growths in the colon that can develop into cancer (called adenomatous polyps) are most likely to develop between 55 and 65 years of age. Screening for colorectal cancer, however, is relatively low among 50-year olds and increases with age, reaching its peak among 70- to 74-year-olds. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer also increases with age, from 50 years old through ages 75 to 79 years, despite the unproved benefit of PSA screening, particularly among men who are 70 years old and older. The rate of screening for breast cancer using mammograms is highest among women 55 to 59 years old and declines after that. Although some guidelines for mammograms do not include women aged 70 years and older, other recommendations suggest that mammograms should be discussed with all women who are expected to live 5 years or more, regardless of age. More research is needed on how age effects cancer screening.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 2 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 2 (5)
Vol. 2, Issue 5
1 Sep 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • The Issue in Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Age-Related Disparities in Cancer Screening: Analysis of 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Age-Related Disparities in Cancer Screening: Analysis of 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data
Anthony F. Jerant, Peter Franks, J. Elizabeth Jackson, Mark P. Doescher
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2004, 2 (5) 481-487; DOI: 10.1370/afm.118

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Age-Related Disparities in Cancer Screening: Analysis of 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data
Anthony F. Jerant, Peter Franks, J. Elizabeth Jackson, Mark P. Doescher
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2004, 2 (5) 481-487; DOI: 10.1370/afm.118
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Socioeconomic Disparity Trends in Cancer Screening Among Women After Introduction of National Quality Indicators
  • Having a Personal Healthcare Provider and Receipt of Adequate Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening
  • The Contribution of Health Literacy to Disparities in Self-Rated Health Status and Preventive Health Behaviors in Older Adults
  • Increasing uptake of colorectal cancer screening
  • Health Insurance-Related Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening in Virginia
  • Health disparities: A barrier to high-quality care
  • In this Issue: The Patient-Clinician Relationship and Practice-Based Network Research
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Agile Implementation of a Digital Cognitive Assessment for Dementia in Primary Care
  • Authorship Inequity in Global Health Research Conducted in Low- and Middle-Income Countries and Published in High-Income Country Family Medicine Journals
  • Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing a Digital Cognitive Assessment for Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias in Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Prevention
  • Person groups:
    • Older adults
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other topics:
    • Disparities in health and health care

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine