Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
  • Log out
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleORIGINAL RESEARCH

Determining the Association Between Continuity of Primary Care and Acute Care Use in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Christy Chong, David Campbell, Meghan Elliott, Fariba Aghajafari and Paul Ronksley
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2022, 20 (3) 237-245; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2813
Christy Chong
1Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
2Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Campbell
1Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
2Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
3Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Meghan Elliott
1Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
2Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
MD, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fariba Aghajafari
1Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
4Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Ronksley
1Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: peronksl@ucalgary.ca
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Criteria to determine final study cohort.

    CKD = chronic kidney disease; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Patient Demographic and Clinical Characteristics by Continuity of Primary Care

    Patient CharacteristicLevel of Relational Continuity of Primary Care
    PoorModerateHighOverall
    Patients, No. (%)16,143 (18.7)25,948 (30.0)44,384 (51.3)86,475 (100.0)
    CKD stage, No. (%)a
        3a9,153 (56.7)15,489 (59.7)27,274 (61.5)51,916 (60.0)
        3b5,145 (31.9)7,960 (30.7)13,313 (30.0)26,418 (30.5)
        41,845 (11.4)2,499 (9.6)3,797 (8.6)8,141 (9.4)
    Age, y, mean (SD)76.1 (12.6)75.7 (11.4)76.2 (10.5)76.0 (11.2)
    Age category, y, No. (%)
        18-44360 (2.2)357 (1.4)364 (0.8)1,081 (1.3)
        45-642,469 (15.3)3,930 (15.1)5,880 (13.2)12,279 (14.2)
        65-743,611 (22.4)6,697 (25.8)11,926 (26.9)22,234 (25.7)
        75-845,571 (34.5)9,492 (36.6)17,326 (39.0)32,389 (37.5)
        ≥854,132 (25.6)5,472 (21.1)8,888 (20.0)18,492 (21.4)
    Female, No. (%)9,571 (59.3)14,902 (57.4)24,483 (55.2)48,956 (56.6)
    Location of residence,No. (%)
        Urban13,221 (82.0)21,978 (84.7)40,339 (90.9)75,538 (87.4)
        Rural2,909 (18.0)3,932 (15.2)3,988 (9.0)10,829 (12.5)
    Albuminuria, No. (%)
        Normal/mild (A1)7,601 (47.1)13,458 (51.9)23,991 (54.1)45,050 (52.1)
        Moderate (A2)2,021 (12.5)3,221 (12.4)5,660 (12.8)10,902 (12.6)
        Severe (A3)1,440 (8.9)2,007 (7.7)2,979 (6.7)6,426 (7.4)
        Unmeasured5,081 (31.5)7,262 (28.0)11,754 (26.5)24,097 (27.9)
    Median household income quintile, No. (%)
        1 (lowest)4,627 (28.7)6,944 (26.8)11,130 (25.1)22,701 (26.3)
        23,673 (22.8)5,893 (22.7)10,036 (22.6)19,602 (22.7)
        32,958 (18.3)5,012 (19.3)8,735 (19.7)16,705 (19.3)
        42,246 (13.9)3,687 (14.2)6,576 (14.8)12,509 (14.5)
        5 (highest)2,062 (12.8)3,686 (14.2)6,986 (15.7)12,734 (14.7)
        6 (unknown)577 (3.6)726 (2.8)921 (2.1)2,224 (2.6)
    Comorbidities, No. (%)
        Asthma1,106 (6.9)1,385 (5.3)1,699 (3.8)4,190 (4.8)
        Atrial fibrillation3,472 (21.5)4,741 (18.3)7,241 (16.3)15,455 (17.9)
        Cancer1,723 (10.7)2,573 (9.9)3,785 (8.5)8,081 (9.3)
        Congestive heart failure4,635 (28.7)5,785 (22.3)8,068 (18.2)18,488 (21.4)
        Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5,379 (33.3)7,239 (27.9)10,000 (22.5)22,618 (26.2)
        Cirrhosis168 (1.0)142 (0.5)186 (0.4)496 (0.6)
        Diabetes5,871 (36.4)8,848 (34.1)15,497 (34.9)30,216 (34.9)
        Hypertension14,008 (86.8)22,293 (85.9)38,475 (86.7)74,776 (86.5)
        Peripheral vascular disease1,084 (6.7)1,413 (5.4)2,052 (4.6)4,549 (5.3)
    Comorbidities, mean (SD)3.9 (2.3)3.3 (2.0)3.0 (1.8)3.2 (2.0)
    ≥1 Visit to a specialist in a 2-year period before index date, No. (%)
        Nephrology2,350 (14.6)3,228 (12.4)4,788 (10.8)10,366 (12.0)
        Endocrinology187 (1.2)228 (0.9)310 (0.7)725 (0.8)
        Oncology49 (0.3)39 (0.2)34 (0.1)122 (0.1)
        Psychiatry1,756 (10.9)1,591 (6.1)1,591 (3.6)4,938 (5.7)
        Cardiology4,332 (26.8)6,344 (24.4)10,001 (22.5)20,677 (23.9)
        Respiratory1,600 (9.9)2,198 (8.5)2,797 (6.3)6,595 (7.6)
        Internal medicine9,095 (56.3)13,088 (50.4)20,713 (46.7)42,896 (49.6)
    • CKD = chronic kidney disease; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate.

    • ↵a CKD stages were defined as stage 3a (eGFR 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m2), stage 3b (eGFR 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m2), and stage 4 (eGFR 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m2).

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    All-Cause and Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Condition–Related Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visit Characteristics by Continuity of Primary Care

    VariableLevel of Relational Continuity of Primary CareOverall
    (n = 86,475)
    Poor
    (n = 16,143)
    Moderate
    (n = 25,948)
    High
    (n = 44,384)
    All-cause hospitalizationsPatients, No.7,93811,02015,85234,810
    Hospitalizations, No. (%)19,835 (25.4)25,551 (32.8)32,602 (41.8)77,988 (100.0)
    Hospitalizations, median (IQR)0 (0-2)0 (0-1)0 (0-1)0 (0-1)
    Person-time, y (%)32,328.8 (17.9)53,698.6 (29.7)94,520.5 (52.4)180,547.9 (100.0)
    Length of hospital stay, d, mean (SD)13.7 (21.1)12.8 (19.2)12.7 (20.0)12.9 (20.0)
    Length of hospital stay, d, median (IQR)0 (0-7)0 (0-5)0 (0-4)0 (0-5)
    Cumulative length of hospital stay, d, median (IQR)15 (6-42)13 (5-39)11 (4-33)13 (5-37)
    Unadjusted hospitalization rate/1,000 person-years (95% CI)613.5475.8344.9432.0
    (605.6-622.7)(470.2-481.9)(341.9-349.4)(429.5-435.6)
    Patients, No.1,0951,3691,8424,306
    ACSC-related hospitalizationsACSC hospitalizations, No. (%)1,714 (26.4)2,045 (31.5)2,730 (42.1)6,489 (100.0)
    ACSC hospitalizations, median (IQR)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
    Person-time, y (%)32,328.8 (17.9)53,698.6 (29.7)94,520.5 (52.4)180,547.9 (100.0)
    Length of hospital stay, d, mean (SD)1.6 (6.7)1.4 (5.7)1.4 (6.0)1.4 (6.1)
    Length of hospital stay, d, median (IQR)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
    Cumulative length of hospital stay, d, median (IQR)0 (0-7)0 (0-5)0 (0-4)0 (0-5)
    Unadjusted ACSC hospitalization rate/1,000 person-years (95% CI)53.138.128.936.0
    (50.6-55.6)(36.5-39.8)(27.9-30.1)(35.1-36.9)
    All-cause ED visitsPatients, No.11,23416,23723,68151,152
    ED visits, No. (%)56,809 (27.8)70,147 (34.3)77,659 (38.0)204,615 (100.0)
    ED visits, median (IQR)2 (0-4)1 (0-3)1 (0-2)1 (0-3)
    Person-time, y (%)32,328.8 (17.9)53,698.6 (29.7)94,520.5 (52.4)180,547.9 (100.0)
    Unadjusted ED visit rate/1,000 person-years (95% CI)1,757.21,306.3823.41,133.3
    (1,744.3-1,773.3)(1,297.2-1,316.5)(817.6-829.2)(1,129.9-1,139.8)
    ACSC-related ED visitsPatients, No.1,4141,7312,2725,417
    ACSC ED visits, No. (%)2,294 (27.1)2,726 (32.2)3,441 (40.7)8,461 (100.0)
    ACSC ED visits, median (IQR)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
    Person-time, y (%)32,328.8 (17.9)53,698.6 (29.7)94,520.5 (52.4)180,547.9 (100.0)
    Unadjusted ACSC ED visits rate/1,000 person-years (95% CI)71.050.836.546.9
    (68.2-74.0)(48.9-62.7)(35.3-37.7)(45.9-47.9)
    • ACSC = ambulatory care-sensitive condition; ED = emergency department; IQR = interquartile range.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Unadjusted and Adjusted Incident Rate Ratios for Health Care Utilization (All-Cause and Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Condition-Related Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits) and Process of Care Outcomes by Continuity of Primary Care

    VariableLevel of Relational Continuity of Pimary CareOverall
    (n = 86,475)
    Poor
    (n = 16,143)
    Moderate
    (n = 25,948)
    High
    (n = 44,384)
    Health care utilization outcomesAll-cause hospitalizationsPatients, No.7,93811,02015,85234,810
    All-cause hospitalizations, No.19,83525,55132,60277,988
    Unadjusted incident rate ratio of all-cause hospitalizations (95% CI)1.85
    (1.79-1.91)
    1.41
    (1.37-1.45)
    (reference)
    Adjusted incident rate ratio of all-cause hospitalizations (95% CI)a1.52
    (1.47-1.57)
    1.28
    (1.25-1.32)
    (reference)
    ACSC-related hospitalizationsPatients, No.1,0951,3691,8424,306
    ACSC-related hospitalizations, No.1,7142,0452,7306,489
    Unadjusted incident rate ratio of ACSC-related hospitalizations (95% CI)1.96
    (1.77-2.16)
    1.35
    (1.24-1.48)
    (reference)
    Adjusted incident rate ratio of ACSC-related hospitalizations (95% CI)b1.58
    (1.44-1.74)
    1.23
    (1.13-1.34)
    (reference)
    All-cause ED visitsPatients, No.11,23416,23723,68151,152
    All-cause ED visits, No.56,80970,14777,659204,615
    Unadjusted incident rate ratio of all-cause ED visits (95% CI)2.18
    (2.12-2.24)
    1.6
    (1.56-1.64)
    (reference)
    Adjusted incident rate ratio of all-cause ED visits (95% CI)a1.78
    (1.73-1.83)
    1.42
    (1.39-1.46)
    (reference)
    ACSC-related ED visitsPatients, No.1,4141,7312,2725,417
    ACSC-related ED visits, No.2,2942,7263,4418,461
    Unadjusted incident rate ratio of ACSC-related ED visits (95% CI)2.1
    (1.92-2.29)
    1.44
    (1.33-1.55)
    (reference)
    Adjusted incident rate ratio of ACSC-related ED visits (95% CI)b1.68
    (1.54-1.82)
    1.28
    (1.19-1.38)
    (reference)
    RAAS inhibitorPatients, No.9,38714,50024,76148,648
    Process of care outcomesUnadjusted odds ratio (95% CI)1.09
    (1.05-1.14)
    1.0
    (0.97-1.03)
    (reference)
    Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)1.03
    (0.98-1.07)
    0.99
    (0.96-1.02)
    (reference)
    Patients, No.7,31812,14721,83141,296
    StatinUnadjusted odds ratio (95% CI)0.75
    (0.69-0.8)
    0.86
    (0.81-0.92)
    (reference)
    Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)0.8
    (0.74-0.86)
    0.89
    (0.84-0.95)
    (reference)
    • ACSC = ambulatory care-sensitive condition; ED = emergency department; IQR = interquartile range; RAAS = renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.

    • ↵a Adjusted by age, sex, household location, median household income quintile, cirrhosis, chronic heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, diabetes, hypertension, and albuminuria severity.

    • ↵b Adjusted by age, sex, household location, median household income quintile, cirrhosis, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, diabetes, and albuminuria severity.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • SUPPLEMENTAL TABLES & FIGURES IN PDF FILE BELOW

    • RonksleySuppApps.pdf -

      PDF file

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 20 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 20 (3)
Vol. 20, Issue 3
1 May 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Plain Language Article Summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Determining the Association Between Continuity of Primary Care and Acute Care Use in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
14 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Determining the Association Between Continuity of Primary Care and Acute Care Use in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Christy Chong, David Campbell, Meghan Elliott, Fariba Aghajafari, Paul Ronksley
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2022, 20 (3) 237-245; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2813

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Determining the Association Between Continuity of Primary Care and Acute Care Use in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Christy Chong, David Campbell, Meghan Elliott, Fariba Aghajafari, Paul Ronksley
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2022, 20 (3) 237-245; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2813
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • An outpatient integrated management program reduced the need for hospitalizations of CKD patients: findings from the PIRP project
  • Relationship between continuity of primary care and hospitalisation for patients with COPD: population-based cohort study from South Korea
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
  • Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?
  • Feasibility and Acceptability of the “About Me” Care Card as a Tool for Engaging Older Adults in Conversations About Cognitive Impairment
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
    • Prevention
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health services
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Continuity

Keywords

  • ambulatory care
  • chronic kidney disease
  • continuity of primary care
  • hospitalization
  • relational continuity
  • primary health care

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine