BUILDING PRIORITIES IN HEALTH & HEALTH CARE INTO ABFM’S KNOWLEDGE ASSESSMENTS

In January 2021, the Board of Directors of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) decided that emerging priorities in health and health care should become an explicit component of knowledge assessment in the future. ABFM examinations and self-assessment activities are comprised of a balance of items representing the competencies within family medicine. The composition of these self-assessments and the examinations is guided by a “blueprint” that reflects current knowledge expected of every family physician regarding diagnosis and treatment in daily practice. These items are written and reviewed by volunteer family physicians who practice in a wide variety of settings across the country; the topics come from their clinical practice along with recent evidence and practice guidelines.

The Board is now adding a new explicit and proactive process to ensure that broad trends impacting the clinical practices of family physicians are reflected in the certification examination. It is not enough for family physicians to have knowledge to practice today. As the largest and most widely distributed group of primary care physicians, and as leaders in responding to emerging health problems, family physicians must address future challenges in practice. Mastery of the specific clinical knowledge will be an important foundation of that work. In this editorial, we describe the process, review the topics chosen, and describe the implications for Diplomates.

Identifying the most important emerging trends is difficult in a generalist specialty like Family Medicine. The list of possible topics is inevitably long, and prioritization is important. Our goal was to identify the most important trends in health and health care for the next 3 to 5 years which will influence clinical decisions in the office, at the bedside, or wherever family physicians practice, and which are appropriate for assessment by multiple choice questions.

We used an iterative evidence-informed process. ABFM senior staff identified possible trends in health and health care, and the ABFM Board of Directors and a national blueprint advisory panel added additional topics to identify a total of 15 options, listed alphabetically in Table 1. Staff then developed brief evidence summaries supporting each one, based on current trends and burden of suffering—prevalence, incidence, morbidity, mortality, and cost. Then, over 2 meetings, the ABFM Board narrowed the list to 7 topics, taking the input and prioritizations of the national blueprint panel and ABFM executive staff into account. There was good concordance across the groups, and the final list was approved by the ABFM Board of Directors in January 2022.

All the proposed topics in Table 1 are important: the final priorities represent a clinical judgement, balancing what is known about burden of suffering and near-term trends in health care with constraints inherent in the process of writing multiple choice questions for the examination. Table 2 lists the final ABFM priorities, in order of the voting, with definitions and a brief rationale for their selection: Health Equity,^1-4 Social Determinants of Health,³ and Structural Racism⁴; Value Based Care⁵ and Population Health⁶; Behavioral Health including Adolescent Suicide^7,8; Multimorbidity^9-11; Opioid Abuse and Addiction^12,13; Embracing Technology (Point of Care Ultrasound,¹⁴ Genomics in Primary Care,¹⁵ and Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning); and Obesity and Activity.^16,17

What are the next steps for ABFM and for Diplomates? The initial task will be to review our existing multiple-choice questions and explore how well these topics are currently addressed; we will likely need to create new questions for some of these topics. Of note, it will be difficult to write questions for some of these topics, such as social determinants of health: it is easy to write questions, hard to write good questions! These topics will then be distributed throughout the knowledge assessments in the ABFM certification portfolio—longitudinal assessment, the one-day certification exam, the In-Training-Exam for residents, Continuous Knowledge Self-Assessment and potential future Knowledge Self-Assessment modules. Of course, it is important to keep in mind that cognitive expertise is only one of the major requirements for Board Certification: commitment to professionalism, lifelong learning and performance improvement are also critical.

Beyond our examination, we hope that setting these-priorities will support the clinical evolution of our specialty as it recovers from the pandemic. The proposed ACGME residency standards¹⁸ represent a bold vision of community engagement and emphasize that the practice is the curriculum, including integrated behavioral health and POCUS. The ABFM priorities align well with the draft residency standards.

ABFM will revisit the priorities in 3 years: given the dramatic changes in health and health care that are taking place, the priorities will likely evolve over time. We encourage suggestions for the future.

• © 2022 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.