Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Meeting ReportSurvey research or cross-sectional study

Identifying the greatest perceived barriers to scholarly activity at an academic medical center using the delphi method

Lauren Dennis, Robert Lennon, David Rabago and Adam Sigal
The Annals of Family Medicine April 2022, 20 (Supplement 1) 2646; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.20.s1.2646
Lauren Dennis
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Lennon
MD, FAAFP, JD, JD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Rabago
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam Sigal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context: Scholarly activity is an important part of medical training and practice. Many perceived barriers to scholarly activity have been identified, but it is difficult to identify which barriers are the most important to address. The Delphi method is a structured process used in to narrow the range of possible answers in a group towards a set of correct answer.

Objective: To use the Delphi method to identify a consensus ranked list of barriers to scholarly activity.

Study Design and Analysis: Iterative Delphi survey, descriptive statistics.

Setting: Academic Medical Center.

Population Studied: Residents, fellows, and faculty at Tower Health Instrument: A three-part Delphi survey. In Survey One, respondents are asked to identify their perceived barriers to scholarly activity. These barriers are consolidated (i.e., “Not enough time” and “Need more time” would be consolidated into a single barrier). In Survey Two, respondents are asked to rank the barriers from greatest to least. Rankings are weight-averaged to generate a ranked list. In Survey Three, respondents are shown their ranking and their peers’ weighted average ranking and given an opportunity to change their ranking.

Outcome Measures: A consensus ranked list of perceived barriers to scholarly activity.

Results: Respondents identified 23 unique barriers to scholarly activity. The top five consensus ranked barriers (greatest barrier to least) were: 1) Not understanding the overall process (from IRB approval to paper publication); 2) Complicated IRB process; 3) Lack of time; 4) Not knowing how to access available resources / how to engage the academic center’s system; and 5) Lack of training / lack of experience / not knowing where to start.

Conclusions: Lack of time is widely cited as a common barrier, and often a point of conflict between medical learners and staff and administration. What is noteworthy in our results is that while lack of time is a barrier, it is 3rd, after two other barriers that are relatively simple administrative coordination issues. It is remarkable that four of the five top barriers are addressable with academic training or administrative support and suggests that organizations may identify low-effort solutions to improve scholarly activity by using the Delphi method to identify consensus ranked barriers.

  • © 2021 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 20 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 20 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 20, Issue Supplement 1
1 Apr 2022
  • Table of Contents
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identifying the greatest perceived barriers to scholarly activity at an academic medical center using the delphi method
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Identifying the greatest perceived barriers to scholarly activity at an academic medical center using the delphi method
Lauren Dennis, Robert Lennon, David Rabago, Adam Sigal
The Annals of Family Medicine Apr 2022, 20 (Supplement 1) 2646; DOI: 10.1370/afm.20.s1.2646

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Identifying the greatest perceived barriers to scholarly activity at an academic medical center using the delphi method
Lauren Dennis, Robert Lennon, David Rabago, Adam Sigal
The Annals of Family Medicine Apr 2022, 20 (Supplement 1) 2646; DOI: 10.1370/afm.20.s1.2646
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Exploring the link between sociodemographic factors and barriers to adherence: survey data collected from people with HIV
  • French Translation and Validation of the e-HEALS and the sDHLI scales with Canadian Seniors
  • Corewell Health primary care providers barriers, knowledge and attitudes toward firearm safety counseling and training
Show more Survey research or cross-sectional study

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine