Published eLetters
If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.
Jump to comment:
- Page navigation anchor for RE: Response to On Abortion and AutonomyRE: Response to On Abortion and Autonomy
The recent ANNALS reflection entitled On Abortion and Autonomy: A Letter to My Unborn Daughter provides a unique perspective on the Dobbs ruling. The differences between those who identify as “pro-choice” and those who identify as “pro-life” has led to conflict, outrage, and even violence. Is there a way physicians on each side of the chasm can build a bridge between these two diametrically opposed viewpoints? One way to begin is to acknowledge the truths that each side brings to the table. The “pro-choice” side highlights the fact that throughout history up to the present day, women have been a mistreated group with little power and limited ability to make decisions about what is best for them. They emphasize the fact that women experience profoundly more, if not all, the harmful and, at times, life threatening physical, emotional, financial, and social effects of pregnancy and childbirth. To this side, it is a matter of the ethical principle of autonomy why women should have the right to abortion. The “pro-life” side highlights the biological fact that pregnancy is the process whereby a distinct and separate living human being is growing and developing inside a woman’s uterus beginning at the time of conception. To this side, the growing human’s right to life takes precedence over a woman’s right to end the pregnancy.
Show More
There are many intelligent, well-meaning physicians in both camps. What are the are ways that physicians of good will from both viewpoints can work t...Competing Interests: None declared.