Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Meeting ReportObesity, exercise and nutrition

Comparative Effectiveness RCT of Two Weight Loss Strategies in Primary Care Patients: MyPlate.gov vs Calorie Counting

Lillian Gelberg, William McCarthy, Dena Herman, Melvin Rico and Li-Jui Chang
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3519; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.21.s1.3519
Lillian Gelberg
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William McCarthy
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dena Herman
PhD, MPH, RD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melvin Rico
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li-Jui Chang
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context: Since 2011, the U.S. government has supported two approaches to achieve healthier body fat composition: the Diabetes Prevention Program calorie counting (CC) approach, and adherence to federal nutrition guidelines at www.choosemyplate.gov (MyPlate).

Objective: Compare the effect of the CC versus MyPlate approach on satiety/satiation and on achieving healthier body fat composition in the primary care setting.

Study Design: Randomized, controlled trial comparing the MyPlate and CC approaches from 2015 to 2017.

Setting: A federally qualified health center in Long Beach, California.

Population: Adult, low-income, mostly Latina patients (N=261) with a BMI between 27 and 40.4 were randomized to condition and followed for twelve months (76.6% retention).

Interventions: Eleven health education sessions featuring MyPlate versus CC messages. Community health workers conducted two home visits, two group education sessions and 7 telephone coaching calls over six months.

Outcome Measures: Satiation and satiety were primary patient-centered outcomes. Waist circumference and body weight were primary anthropometric measures. These were assessed at baseline, 6- and 12-months follow-up.

Results: Satiation and satiety scores increased for both groups; neither group lost significant body weight, and only the MyPlate condition reduced waist circumference by 2 cm at 12 months. Both conditions reported consuming proportionately more fruits and vegetables and fewer sugary beverages at 12 months. MyPlate but not CC participants experienced lower systolic blood pressure at 6 months follow-up; neither group had lower blood pressure at 12 months. Both MyPlate and CC participants reported higher quality of life and emotional well-being at 12 months and high satisfaction with their assigned weight loss program. At 12 months follow-up, the most acculturated participants experienced the greatest reduction in waist circumference.

Conclusions: A MyPlate-based intervention may be a practical alternative to the more traditional CC approach to promoting satiety and facilitating reduction in central adiposity among low-income mostly Latina overweight primary care patients. Our results align with recommendations favoring a diet rich in diverse, fiber-rich foods. More research is warranted to investigate satiety-enhancing approaches to desirable weight control in diverse populations and the use of community health workers as change agents.

  • © 2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 21, Issue Supplement 1
1 Jan 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparative Effectiveness RCT of Two Weight Loss Strategies in Primary Care Patients: MyPlate.gov vs Calorie Counting
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Comparative Effectiveness RCT of Two Weight Loss Strategies in Primary Care Patients: MyPlate.gov vs Calorie Counting
Lillian Gelberg, William McCarthy, Dena Herman, Melvin Rico, Li-Jui Chang
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3519; DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.3519

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Comparative Effectiveness RCT of Two Weight Loss Strategies in Primary Care Patients: MyPlate.gov vs Calorie Counting
Lillian Gelberg, William McCarthy, Dena Herman, Melvin Rico, Li-Jui Chang
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3519; DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.3519
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Development of a Multidisciplinary Clinic for the Treatment of Obesity in a Canadian University Family Medicine Group (U-FMG)
  • Parental Support and the Built Environment: A 4-Way Decomposition Analysis of Children’s Physical Activity
  • Parental Awareness of and Agreement With the American Academy of Pediatrics Clinical Practice Guideline for Obesity Treatment
Show more Obesity, exercise and nutrition

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine