Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Meeting ReportHealthcare services, delivery, and financing

Is Medical Abortion Feasible in Primary Care? Regulating Mifepristone as a Normal Prescription: Effect on Abortion Workforce

Wendy Norman, Liz Darling, Janusz Kaczorowski, Sheila Dunn, Laura Schummers, Michael Law and Kimberlyn McGrail
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3602; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.21.s1.3602
Wendy Norman
MD, CCFP, FCFP, MHSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liz Darling
PhD, RM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janusz Kaczorowski
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sheila Dunn
MD, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Schummers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Law
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kimberlyn McGrail
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context: Prior to 2017, most abortions in Canada were surgical and provided by a small number of physicians, mainly in urban areas. The medical abortion pill mifepristone first became available in Jan 2017. By Nov 2017 the regulations were globally unique; mifepristone was treated as a normal prescription drug. Both physicians and nurse-practitioners (NPs) can prescribe, and any pharmacist can dispense the pill for self-administration by the patient at a convenient time and place. We hypothesized the unique regulation of mifepristone would increase the size and distribution of the abortion workforce, particularly in primary care, and thus reduce rural-urban access disparity.

Objective: We investigated trends for abortion rate, method, and workforce.

Setting and Dataset: Ontario, including 40% of Canada’s residents, linked health administrative data.

Study design and Analysis: We defined all abortions from Jan 1, 2012 to Mar 10, 2020, using practitioner visits, hospital, emergency and ambulatory care admissions, and dispensed pharmaceuticals. We used interrupted time series (ITS) analysis to compare temporal trends in abortion rate, method, and workforce composition.

Population: All most responsible professionals providing abortion (MRP-A), defining one MRP-A per abortion.

Intervention: We compared MRP-A prior to mifepristone (Jan 2012 to Jan 2017), to once it was available to prescribe normally (Nov 7, 2017 – Mar 10, 2020).

Outcome Measures: Trends and rates for the number and characteristics of MRP-A: age, specialty, rural vs urban, abortion method, service volume and rate of providers per 1000 female residents aged 15-49 years (1Kfem15-49) per health region.

Results: Among all 315,447 abortions we identified an MRP-A for 311,742 (98.3%). The abortion rate was stable 2012-2020, approximately 11 per 1Kfem15-49 while the percent as medical abortion increased from 2.2% to 31.4%. The rate of MRP per 1Kfem15-49 tripled. The rate of rural MRP-A increased seven-fold while the rate of rural physicians did not change. Mean age of MRP-As fell 6.9 years. By the end of the study period most MRP-As were GPs (66.5%) with 23.2% OBGyns and 9.1% NPs.

Conclusions: When regulatory change supported primary care friendly approaches to medical abortion, it was rapidly implemented in both urban and rural primary care. We observed a tripling of the overall number of abortion providers, including a seven-fold increase in rural areas, while the abortion rate was stable.

  • © 2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 21, Issue Supplement 1
1 Jan 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is Medical Abortion Feasible in Primary Care? Regulating Mifepristone as a Normal Prescription: Effect on Abortion Workforce
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Is Medical Abortion Feasible in Primary Care? Regulating Mifepristone as a Normal Prescription: Effect on Abortion Workforce
Wendy Norman, Liz Darling, Janusz Kaczorowski, Sheila Dunn, Laura Schummers, Michael Law, Kimberlyn McGrail
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3602; DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.3602

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Is Medical Abortion Feasible in Primary Care? Regulating Mifepristone as a Normal Prescription: Effect on Abortion Workforce
Wendy Norman, Liz Darling, Janusz Kaczorowski, Sheila Dunn, Laura Schummers, Michael Law, Kimberlyn McGrail
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3602; DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.3602
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Changes in local access to mifepristone dispensed by community pharmacies for medication abortion in Ontario: a population-based repeated cross-sectional study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A framework for patient goals that guides providers in the process of goal oriented care
  • An Evaluation of Physician Retention Bonuses in Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Clinical reminder alert fatigue in healthcare: a systematic literature review using qualitative evidence
Show more Healthcare services, delivery, and financing

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine