Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Meeting ReportQualitative research

Determining best Communication Practices in Telemedicine Abortion Care: Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives

Emily Godfrey, Anna Fiastro, Molly Ruben, Elizabeth Young, Ian Bennett and Elizabeth Jacob-Files
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 4114; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.21.s1.4114
Emily Godfrey
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Fiastro
MPH, MEM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Molly Ruben
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Young
MD, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian Bennett
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Jacob-Files
MA, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context: Abortion care using novel no-test telemedicine protocols and delivery of abortion pills by mail provides an historic opportunity for primary care to include medication abortion as part of the comprehensive reproductive care provided to patients. Because in-person care in the clinical setting was the only model, it is unknown whether communication practices by clinicians warrants a shift with telemedicine abortion.

Objective: to evaluate best practices in patient-provider communication for telemedicine abortion care.

Study Design/Analysis: We conducted in-depth interviews and used inductive-deductive constant comparative analysis. A community advisory board guided our interview guide and interpretation of findings.

Setting: High-volume reproductive healthcare clinic organization with several satellite locations throughout Washington State.

Population Studied: Patients who recently sought either in-clinic or telemedicine medication abortion services with licensed advance practice and family medicine providers.

Instrument: Miller’s conceptual framework for patient-clinician communication in telemedicine settings shaped the interview guide.

Outcome Measures: Decision to choose in-clinic or telemedicine services and experiences with scheduling process, attending the appointment and communication of the clinician.

Results: 30 research participants, 20 telemedicine and 10 in-clinic, completed the interview. Telehealth patients reported similar levels of interpersonal connection to their providers as in-clinic patients, including feeling their provider was relatable, supportive, affirming of their decision, not-rushed, empathetic, and an attentive listener. Some telehealth patients reported an enhanced communication experience due to their decreased anxiety and stress from avoiding an in-clinic visit. Both groups of patients understood the plan of care, including how to obtain and take medications, and felt empowered to garner personal and medical support as necessary. All patients relied heavily on printed clinic materials and online resources to answer symptomatic questions during the abortion process.

Conclusions: Patients receiving either telemedicine or in-clinic abortion services by primary care providers reported similar interpersonal and medical information communication experiences. Challenging contextual factors reported by some in-clinic patients suggests telehealth as a favorable option for medication abortion care services.

  • © 2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 21, Issue Supplement 1
1 Jan 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Determining best Communication Practices in Telemedicine Abortion Care: Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Determining best Communication Practices in Telemedicine Abortion Care: Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives
Emily Godfrey, Anna Fiastro, Molly Ruben, Elizabeth Young, Ian Bennett, Elizabeth Jacob-Files
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 4114; DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.4114

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Determining best Communication Practices in Telemedicine Abortion Care: Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives
Emily Godfrey, Anna Fiastro, Molly Ruben, Elizabeth Young, Ian Bennett, Elizabeth Jacob-Files
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 4114; DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.4114
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Telemedicine Abortion in Primary Care: An Exploration of Patient Experiences
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Impostorism in first year medical students: An art-based analysis of masks
  • How Physicians of Different Races and Ethnicities Experience Racism in US Healthcare
  • Drowning in Paperwork: The Burden of Administrative Responsibilities in Primary Care
Show more Qualitative research

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine