Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Meeting ReportSurvey research or cross-sectional study

Assessing the Appropriateness of BMD Testing for the Prevention of Fragility Fracture at a Family Medicine Teaching Clinic

Justin Ballick, Jasmin Ali and Roland Grad
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 4301; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.21.s1.4301
Justin Ballick
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jasmin Ali
BSc, MDCM Candidate
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roland Grad
MD, MSc, FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context: Dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is used to measure bone mineral density (BMD) and identify individuals at risk of fragility fractures. In 2010, Osteoporosis Canada recommended screening females under 65 for low BMD only in the presence of clinical risk factors. Assessing concordance between clinical practice and 2010 guidelines is a step toward improving quality of care by raising awareness of suspected low-value BMD testing.

Objective: To determine the extent to which females aged 50-64 have clinical risk factors for fragility fracture in concordance with Osteoporosis Canada guidelines at initial BMD testing.

Study Design: Cross-sectional study, December 2021.

Setting or Dataset: Community-based primary care. Data were extracted from electronic medical records (EMR) of a family medicine teaching clinic. At this clinic, the EMR was implemented in November 2015. From this date to December 1, 2021, we searched the EMR using keywords for BMD requests or reports in relevant fields: Medical Summary, Visit Purpose, All Documents, Test Requests.

Population Studied: Females over 50 as of December 1, 2021 with at least one BMD test report or test request and at least three clinical notes preceding the initial BMD test request to assess the reason for testing. 867 patients met these criteria.

Intervention/Instrument: Not applicable.

Outcome Measures: For females aged 50-64 screened at the clinic, the proportion with documented clinical risk factors for fragility fracture in comparison to the proportion with no such risk factors.

Results: We reviewed a random sample of 322 of 867 patient charts. 226 of 322 (70%, 95% CI 65 to 75%) could not be assessed in the absence of the initial BMD test report, test request or sufficient documentation to assess the appropriateness of the test. Of the remaining 96 patient charts, 40 (42%, 95% CI 32 to 52%) were 65 or older at the time of the initial BMD test. Of the 56 females aged 50-64, 32 (58%, 95% CI 48 to 68%) had clinical risk factors in line with current screening recommendations while 24 (43%, 95% CI 30 to 57%) did not.

Conclusion: At a family medicine teaching clinic, initial BMD testing is being done in many females under 65 who do not have risk factors for fragility fracture. This reveals a discordance between clinical practice and Osteoporosis Canada recommendations and identifies a target for quality improvement.

  • © 2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 21, Issue Supplement 1
1 Jan 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing the Appropriateness of BMD Testing for the Prevention of Fragility Fracture at a Family Medicine Teaching Clinic
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Assessing the Appropriateness of BMD Testing for the Prevention of Fragility Fracture at a Family Medicine Teaching Clinic
Justin Ballick, Jasmin Ali, Roland Grad
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 4301; DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.4301

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Assessing the Appropriateness of BMD Testing for the Prevention of Fragility Fracture at a Family Medicine Teaching Clinic
Justin Ballick, Jasmin Ali, Roland Grad
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 4301; DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.4301
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Exploring the link between sociodemographic factors and barriers to adherence: survey data collected from people with HIV
  • Corewell Health primary care providers barriers, knowledge and attitudes toward firearm safety counseling and training
  • Primary Care Provider Perspectives at an Academic Medical Center: Are Telemedicine Visits as Effective as In-person Care?
Show more Survey research or cross-sectional study

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine