Published eLetters
If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.
Jump to comment:
- Page navigation anchor for Evaluating Physician Value through CompassionEvaluating Physician Value through Compassion
Dear Editor,
We read with keen interest the article by Dr. Timothy Aaron Zeller and colleagues, "What Are Doctors For? A Call for Compassion-Based Metrics as a Measure of Physician Value." The authors compellingly argue for the integration of compassion, empathy, and humanism into the metrics used to assess physician performance. As family physicians practicing within the Spanish public health system, we would like to offer reflections on how these values are embedded in our medical practice and evaluation.
In Spain, the public healthcare system places a strong emphasis on primary care as the main pillar of health services. Family physicians are often the first point of contact and maintain ongoing relationships with patients and their families. This continuity of care fosters a deep understanding of patients' social and emotional contexts, which is integral to delivering compassionate care. Studies have shown that such continuity is associated with improved health outcomes and patient satisfaction [1,2].
Our evaluation systems in Spain extend beyond quantitative metrics like productivity and clinical outcomes. They include qualitative assessments of patient satisfaction, qnd indireectly our communication skills, and the ability to build trusting relationships. Patient feedback is routinely collected and plays a significant role in performance appraisals. This patient-related approach aligns with the authors' call for compassion-bas...
Show MoreCompeting Interests: None declared. - Page navigation anchor for RE: What Are Doctors For?RE: What Are Doctors For?
I guess the big question is to ask whether there is any value in the whole process/industry of physician measurement.
Is it proven to produce improvement in meaningful, long-term outcomes? Does it merely measure how good physicians are at being measured? Or does it actually drain away resources and intellectual capital such that outcomes are worsened?
I don't think we know.
And then one has to ask why physicians are so eager to be measured. Teachers fought it, unsuccssfully, and have watched their profession being destroyed. Lawyers. accountants, priests/ministers/rabbis, other professionals seem to have avoided it.
What are we hoping to achieve by submitting ourselves to this process?
Competing Interests: None declared.