Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleDepartmentsF

Advancing the Science of Family Medicine

Jon Salsberg
The Annals of Family Medicine July 2024, 22 (4) 361-362; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3159
Jon Salsberg
NAPCRG Committee on Advancing the Science of Family Medicine; Associate Professor of Primary Healthcare Research, University of Limerick School of Medicine (Ireland);
Department of Family Medicine, McGill University (Canada)
PhD, Chair
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

NAPCRG (formerly the North American Primary Care Research Group) was founded in 1972 by Maurice Wood out of a desire to create a nurturing community for those who shared the then-heretical view that family medicine is a research discipline. For more than 50 years, NAPCRG has pursued its mission to support a membership committed to producing and disseminating new knowledge from all disciplines relevant to primary care. This is accomplished through building various research capacities. Building the researchers themselves by fostering the training and development of new and existing primary care researchers, exposing them to new ideas, and providing them the space to share and learn from each other’s work. Building a flourishing primary care research ecosystem by growing its funding base through initiatives such as the Grant Generating Project. And building the discipline itself through advancing the science of family medicine and primary care.

NAPCRG’s Committee on Advancing the Science of Family Medicine (CASFM) was established to promote and actively contribute scholarship that advances the science of family medicine for the betterment of patients and their communities. Its mission is to assure that the development, translation, and implementation of new knowledge rapidly becomes part of the fabric of family medicine practice. CASFM is comprised of 6 work groups with specific topical and methodological foci. Within each of these groups, NAP-CRG members with similar interests come together to collaborate on projects that push the science that underpins new evidence. Each group has a mandate to meet at least 4 times per year and produce at least 1 product per year for dissemination to the general NAPCRG membership and the wider family medicine and primary care community.

Research Methods

The Research Methods work group has a focus on methodological and analytic issues, both qualitative and quantitative, that are key for family medicine and primary care research. This group is dedicated to:

  • Advocacy for excellence and state-of-the-art methods in family medicine and primary care research

  • Identification and exploration of new issues in research methodology, including novel study designs and qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods that may be relevant in family medicine and primary care research.

  • Creation of a repository for information about research methods in primary care to be available to NAPCRG members

Past products of the Research Methods group have included:

  • A Model for Evaluating Practice Transformation: Methods Applicable to the Emerging Science of Primary Care Systems Redesign. A workshop at the NAPCRG Annual Meeting, November, 2012

  • ASFM 2016 Methods pre-conference: Advancing Primary Care Research. November 12, 2016

  • Using Rapid Turn-Around Methods to Conduct High-Quality Qualitative Primary Care Research (PR5). A half-day pre-conference workshop at the NAPCRG Annual Meeting November 2019.

Health Information Technology

This work group considers the research and standards priorities in ambulatory/primary care, and opportunities to advance understanding of HIT needs in primary care. It is also working to identify the HIT needs for creating a PCMH.

Past products of the Health Information Technology group have included:

  • Peterson KA. Essential requirements of information technology for primary care. Fam Pract. 2012; 29: 119-120. 10.1093/fampra/cms028

  • Krist AH, Beasley JW, Crosson JC, et al. Electronic health record functionality needed to better support primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21:764-771. 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002229

  • Identifying and developing AI for primary care; a user centered/participatory design workshop of the CASFM HIT Workgroup. A pre-conference workshop at the NAPCRG Annual Meeting October 2023.

Complexity Science

The Complexity Science work group seeks to promote the application of complexity science principles to the conduct and interpretation of primary care research. This is one of the newest CASFM workgroups, with growing interest and membership in recent years.

The successful products of the Complexity Science group include:

  • Establishment of a complexity science listserv and monthly conference calls

  • Annual tracks of paper and poster complexity science presentations at NAPCRG

  • Development of a complexity science curriculum

  • Creation of complexity science modules on NAPCRG website

  • Inclusion of term “complexity science” for submissions

  • Identification of a cadre of reviewers in complexity science

  • Development of “Complexity Science Forum” in the Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

  • Assistance with the development of the International Society for Systems and Complexity Sciences for Health

Medical Education Research

The Medical Education Research work group was born in 2016 with the aim to promote the development of the medical education field of inquiry among family physicians and other researchers in primary care. This group is dedicated to achieving the following goals and activities:

  • To unite medical education scholars in the NAPCRG community and foster scholarship in educational research

  • To support the implementation of educational innovations at all levels in family medicine

  • To undertake knowledge translation activities aimed to strengthen the visibility of this field of inquiry among all educational stakeholders

Products of the Medical Education Research work group have included:

  • CASFM 2016 Methods Pre-Conference: Advancing Primary Care Research. Presented on Saturday, November 12, 2016

  • CASFM Medical Education Session with Dr. Charo Rodríguez, March 2024

  • CASFM Medical Education Session with Drs. M. Epstein and Y. Maryam, December 2023.

Participatory Health Research

The Participatory Health Research work group promotes and supports collaborative research partnerships in primary care together with patients, communities, and other stakeholder partners. Its goals include jointly collaborating on products that increase understanding and capacity for a participatory approach in primary care research; supporting primary care researchers and professionals undertaking participatory research; and advocating for participatory research policy within relevant research and health care organizations.

Past products of the Participatory Health Research work group have included:

  • Responsible Research with Communities: Participatory Research in Primary Care. This policy statement was adopted by the NAPCRG Board of Directors and membership at the NAP-CRG Annual Meeting on November 6, 1998. NAPCRG was the first international research organization to adopt such a policy on community-based research.

  • Allen ML, Salsberg J, Knot M, LeMaster JW, et al. Engaging with communities, engaging with patients: amendment to the NAPCRG 1998 Policy Statement on Responsible Research With Communities. Fam Pract. 2017;34(3):313-321. 10.1093/fampra/cmw074

  • Ramsden V, Salsberg J, Herbert C, Westfall J, LeMaster J, Macaulay AC. Patient- and community-oriented research: how is authentic engagement identified in grant applications? Can Fam Physician. 2017;63(1):74-76. https://www.cfp.ca/content/63/1/74.long

Practice-Based Research Networks

The Practice-Based Research Networks (PRBN) work group explores the role of practice-based research laboratories and learning communities in the development of new model practices. It is currently using a collaborative strategy to develop research best practices specific to the context of practice-based research. The group also considers advocacy needs of practice-based researchers.

Past products of the PBRN work group have included:

  • Donahue KE, Manca D, Halladay JR, et al. The watershed of practice-based research: lessons and opportunities from the COVID pandemic. HealthAffairs. Published Jan 20, 2022. 10.1377/forefront.20220118.451069

  • Dolor RJ, Campbell-Voytal K, Daly J, et al. Practice-based research network research good practices (PRGPs): summary of recommendations. Clin Transl Sci. 2015;8(6):638-646. 10.1111/cts.12317

  • Campbell-Voytal K, Daly JM, Nagykaldi ZJ, et al. Team science approach to developing consensus on research good practices for practice-based research networks: a case study. Clin Transl Sci. 2015;8(6): 632–637. 10.1111/cts.12363

CASFM welcomes and encourages global participation from across all areas of primary care research. For information on how to get involved, please contact napcrgoffice{at}napcrg.org

  • © 2024 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (4)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (4)
Vol. 22, Issue 4
July/August 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Plain-Language Summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Advancing the Science of Family Medicine
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Advancing the Science of Family Medicine
Jon Salsberg
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2024, 22 (4) 361-362; DOI: 10.1370/afm.3159

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Advancing the Science of Family Medicine
Jon Salsberg
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2024, 22 (4) 361-362; DOI: 10.1370/afm.3159
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Research Methods
    • Health Information Technology
    • Complexity Science
    • Medical Education Research
    • Participatory Health Research
    • Practice-Based Research Networks
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Departments

  • Addressing Research Pathway Gaps: Insights from a Needs Assessment at the AAFP Future Conference
  • Support for the WHO Resolution on Social Participation
  • Resident Leadership Roles and Selection
Show more Departments

Family Medicine Updates

  • Support for the WHO Resolution on Social Participation
  • Resident Leadership Roles and Selection
  • New Advocacy Ambassadors Program Helps AAFP Members Engage With Their Legislators
Show more Family Medicine Updates

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine