Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticlePrescribing and pharmacotherapeutics

Intensity of medication review activities in private and public clinics

Richard Young, Kimberly Fulda, Yan Xiao and Somer Blair
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6430; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6430
Richard Young
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kimberly Fulda
DrPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yan Xiao
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Somer Blair
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context: Medication review is an essential part of most office visits.

Objective: We aimed to compare medication review activities between private and public clinics.

Study Design: Survey of medication review activities after primary care visits.

Setting: One private primary care clinic and two clinics of a safety net hospital system that serves inner-city populations with significant socio-economic challenges.

Population: Primary care visits by patients 55 years or older, taking 5 or more chronic medications, speaking English or Spanish during April through December 2023.

Instrument: A published medication review form completed by prescribing clinicians to identify medication related safety issues and regimen changes.

Outcome Measures: Regimen changes and medication related safety issues.

Results: Medication review forms were collected for 103 and 302 visits in private and public clinics, respectively. The patients in the public clinics were younger (71[64;76] vs 61[56; 67] years old), more likely to be Black/African American (50.0 vs 35.4%) and less likely Hispanic (20.7 vs 41.1%) background. The patients had similar levels of education (less than high school 30.2 vs 28.2%), numbers of prescription medications (6[5;9] vs 6 [5;8]), and prevalent conditions requiring medications, including hypertension (81.5 vs 88.3%), high cholesterol (65.9 vs 64.1%), and pain (55.6 vs 48.5%). The patients in the public clinic were less likely to have insurance for medications (77.4 vs 96.1%). Medication changes occurred much more frequently in public clinics (odds ratio 11.1[6.3-25.0]), including new (25.5 vs 6.8%), extending (17.5 vs 1.9%), and discontinuing prescriptions (16.9 vs 1.9%). Medication related safety issues were much more likely identified in visits at public clinics (odds ratio 12.5[5.6-33.3], including those with regimens (35.1 vs 2.1%), self-management (21.3 vs 3.9%), communication (13.0 vs 4.9%), and discrepancies (19.9 vs 2.9%).

Conclusions: The amount of medication review activities was much higher in visits at public clinics compared with those at a private clinic. Public clinics were 10 times more likely to have medication changes and to encounter medication safety issues during visits for 55+ year old patients with 5 or more prescription medications. Time-motion studies and fee-for-service payment in primary care should consider the profound impact of practice settings influenced by insurance coverage and social determinants.

  • © 2024 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc. For the private, noncommercial use of one individual user of the Web site. All other rights reserved.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 22, Issue Supplement 1
20 Nov 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intensity of medication review activities in private and public clinics
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Intensity of medication review activities in private and public clinics
Richard Young, Kimberly Fulda, Yan Xiao, Somer Blair
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6430; DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.6430

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Intensity of medication review activities in private and public clinics
Richard Young, Kimberly Fulda, Yan Xiao, Somer Blair
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6430; DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.6430
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Predictors of exposure to high-priority drug-drug interactions among non-elderly adults in Quebec, Canada
  • Effect of patient-facility language discordance on potentially inappropriate prescribing of antipsychotics in long-term care
Show more Prescribing and pharmacotherapeutics

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine