Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleWomen’s health

A Comparative Study Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Prenatal Screening among pregnant women in Canada

Meryeme El Balqui, Francois Rousseau, Sylvie Langlois, Georgina Suélène Dofara, Souleymane Gadio, Denis Talbot and France Legare
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6534; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6534
Meryeme El Balqui
BSc, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francois Rousseau
MD, FRCPC, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sylvie Langlois
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georgina Suélène Dofara
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Souleymane Gadio
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Denis Talbot
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
France Legare
MD, PhD, MSc, CCMF
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context: The integration of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) as a universal first-tier screening could provide an earlier screening and if needed, diagnostic result compared to standard screening. While the clinical performance of NIPS is well-documented, to our knowledge, no research has documented its impact on pregnant women’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL), thus hampering informed decision-making about prenatal options.

Objective: We compared the impact of NIPS on HRQoL with that to standard care.

Study Design and Analysis: In a prospective multicentric randomized 2:1 clinical trial, descriptive and multivariable analyses, mainly linear mixed models, were performed.

Setting: Randomization considered age and recruitment site in Quebec and British-Columbia.

Population Studied: Pregnant women (≥19 years) undergoing foetal chromosomal anomaly screening (T13, T18, T21).

Intervention/Instrument: First-tier NIPS compared to standard care.

Outcome Measures: HRQoL was assessed using the PROMIS-29 v2.1 at 10, 16, and 22 weeks of gestation.

Results: A total of 7815 pregnant women have been recruited, with mean age of 32 years (Standard Deviation=4) and 64.7% of European origin in both groups. At 10, 16, and 22 weeks of gestation, the PROMIS-29 T-Scores of physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles, and pain were 47.2 to 53.0 (± 6 to 8) in both arms and the majority falls within the normal limits category of the T-score across all PROMIS-29 domains. The mean differences between first-tier NIPS group and standard care group were -0.27 (95% CI -0.87;0.33, P=0.2) for physical function, 0.21 (95% CI -0.55;0.98, P=0.35) for anxiety,0.28 (95% CI -0.41;0.96, P=0.28) for depression,0.55 (95% CI -0.19;1.30, P=0.08) for fatigue, 0.15 (95% CI -0.35;0.95, P=0.18) for sleep disturbance, -0.50 (95% CI -1.25;0.22, P=0.09) for ability to participate in social roles, and 0.12 (95% CI -0.50;0.74 P=0.48) for pain.

Conclusions: Trajectories of physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles, and pain interference T-Scores were similar between groups. No significant differences were detected between the two groups. Our findings offer initial evidence that choosing first-tier NIPS for prenatal screening maintains HRQOL through 22 weeks of gestation, similar to standard care. This evidence will inform future decision aids about prenatal screening.

  • © 2024 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc. For the private, noncommercial use of one individual user of the Web site. All other rights reserved.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 22, Issue Supplement 1
20 Nov 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Comparative Study Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Prenatal Screening among pregnant women in Canada
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A Comparative Study Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Prenatal Screening among pregnant women in Canada
Meryeme El Balqui, Francois Rousseau, Sylvie Langlois, Georgina Suélène Dofara, Souleymane Gadio, Denis Talbot, France Legare
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6534; DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.6534

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
A Comparative Study Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Prenatal Screening among pregnant women in Canada
Meryeme El Balqui, Francois Rousseau, Sylvie Langlois, Georgina Suélène Dofara, Souleymane Gadio, Denis Talbot, France Legare
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6534; DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.6534
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Pregnancy outcomes and complications in refugees and other newcomers at a Family Medicine practice in Philadelphia, PA
  • Functional Culture Creation and Trauma-informed Care: A Conceptual Model of Change for Labor and Delivery
  • Virtual Visits in Prenatal Care: Benefits/Limitations, Uptake, and Patient Perceptions
Show more Women’s health

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine