Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleCancer research (not screening)

Prioritizing Actionable Implementation Strategies to Support Breast Cancer Follow-up in Primary Care

Denalee O'Malley, Sarah Fadem, Jeanne Ferrante, Shawna Hudson, Benjamin Crabtree, Jennifer Hemler, Lisa Mikesell and Ayana April-Sanders
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6606; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6606
Denalee O'Malley
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Fadem
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeanne Ferrante
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shawna Hudson
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Crabtree
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Hemler
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Mikesell
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ayana April-Sanders
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the emphasis of primary care’s (PC) role in breast cancer follow-up improvements have had limited clinical impact.

OBJECTIVE: To prioritize implementation strategies to support PC adoption of evidence to guide breast cancer follow-up care.

STUDY DESIGN AND ANALYSIS: We used an iterative, mixed method approach engaging national and local PC stakeholders in depth interviews and two (separate) Delphi panels, including expert panelists (4 rounds) and local PC health system stakeholders (2 rounds). We identified strategies during qualitative interview data analysis, and strategies were consolidated with Round 0 expert Delphi panel responses. Remaining strategies listed were evaluated by each Delphi panel on importance and feasibility.

SETTING: A purposive sample of national stakeholders participated in the expert panel and interviews. Local PC stakeholders participated in the second panel.

POPULATION STUDIED: Diverse stakeholders (PC clinicians, survivorship experts, policy leaders, oncologists, and patient advocates) were interviewed (n=45). PC survivorship experts (n=23) and local PC stakeholders (n=48) participated in separate Delphi panels.

INSTRUMENT: RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) was applied to Delphi panels.

OUTCOME MEASURE: Actionable strategies to be tested in a health system intervention.

RESULTS: Identified actionable strategies (n=29) were assessed by both Delphi panels. Local PC stakeholders were more optimistic than experts about feasibility but rated many strategies as uncertain. Cross panel strategies where consensus was reached included: (1) educating PC providers on survivorship guidelines, (2) enabling screening reminders, templates, and monitoring alerts in the electronic medical record, (3) educating patients on survivorship and communicating needs with PC, and (4) increasing oncology-PC communications.

CONCLUSIONS: Stakeholder developed strategies were prioritized to inform the development of a multi-component intervention to improve follow-up care in PC. Future work will test and evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of these strategies to improve follow up care for breast cancer survivors in PC.

  • © 2024 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc. For the private, noncommercial use of one individual user of the Web site. All other rights reserved.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 22, Issue Supplement 1
20 Nov 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prioritizing Actionable Implementation Strategies to Support Breast Cancer Follow-up in Primary Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Prioritizing Actionable Implementation Strategies to Support Breast Cancer Follow-up in Primary Care
Denalee O'Malley, Sarah Fadem, Jeanne Ferrante, Shawna Hudson, Benjamin Crabtree, Jennifer Hemler, Lisa Mikesell, Ayana April-Sanders
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6606; DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.6606

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Prioritizing Actionable Implementation Strategies to Support Breast Cancer Follow-up in Primary Care
Denalee O'Malley, Sarah Fadem, Jeanne Ferrante, Shawna Hudson, Benjamin Crabtree, Jennifer Hemler, Lisa Mikesell, Ayana April-Sanders
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6606; DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.6606
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Impact of Integrative Medicine in People with Cancer: An Analysis from the BraveNet Practice-Based Research Network
  • Decisional Regret Two-Year after Diagnosis with Low-risk Prostate Cancer in a Population-based Sample
Show more Cancer research (not screening)

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine