Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleSystematic review, meta-analysis, or scoping review

shared decision-making with users with complex care needs: a scoping review

Marie-Eve Perron, Marie-Eve Poitras and Catherine Hudon
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6799; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6799
Marie-Eve Perron
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie-Eve Poitras
PhD, MSc, RN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine Hudon
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context A number of patients have complex care needs that arise from interactions among multiple factors, such as multimorbidity, mental health issues, and social vulnerability. These factors influence decisions about healthcare and health services. Shared decision-making (SDM), a collaborative process between patients and professionals, is known to improve the quality of the decision-making process. However, some challenges of patients with complex care needs (PCCN)s can lead to SDM specificities.

Objective Identify specificities of SDM process with PCCNs.

Study Design and Analysis Scoping review according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology with an expert’s consultation as proposed by Arksey et O’Malley. Data have been summarized based on Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) and Interprofessional SDM Model (IP-SDM) mixed thematic analysis (deductive and inductive). The results have been integrated during the experts’ consultation to collect data on professional practice and the integration of SDM for PCCNs.

Setting Any context across PCCNs healthcare services utilization.

Population Studied PCCNs are defined as patients presenting a combination of two or more elements of vulnerability (multiple concurrent chronic conditions, functional and cognitive impairments, mental health challenges and social vulnerability, individual characteristics, or major change in his life or care trajectory)

Intervention/Instrument An extraction guide has been developed based on the domains of the ODSF and the IP-SDM, two validated SDM models.

Outcome Measures Interprofessional approach, decision-making key factors, decision support needs, decision support interventions and assessment of process quality/decision-making outcomes will be described.

Results Twelve studies were included in the review. Overall, our results demonstrated the importance of recognizing some specificities of shared decision-making with people with complex care needs, such as the simultaneous presence of multiple decisions and the interdisciplinary and intersectoral nature of the health care and health services they receive.

Conclusions This scoping review highlights some specificities that must be considered in shared decision-making with people with complex care needs.

  • © 2024 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc. For the private, noncommercial use of one individual user of the Web site. All other rights reserved.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 22, Issue Supplement 1
20 Nov 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
shared decision-making with users with complex care needs: a scoping review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
shared decision-making with users with complex care needs: a scoping review
Marie-Eve Perron, Marie-Eve Poitras, Catherine Hudon
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6799; DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.6799

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
shared decision-making with users with complex care needs: a scoping review
Marie-Eve Perron, Marie-Eve Poitras, Catherine Hudon
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6799; DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.6799
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Risk Factors for ICU Admission for Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Young Children in the COVID Era: A Meta-Analysis
  • Vending machines for harm reduction and community health: a systematic review
Show more Systematic review, meta-analysis, or scoping review

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine