Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Primary Care and Its Patient-Level Variation: An American Family Cohort Study

Shiying Hao, Guoyu Tao, William S. Pearson, Ilia Rochlin, Robert L. Phillips, David H. Rehkopf and Neil Kamdar
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2025, 23 (2) 136-144; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.240164
Shiying Hao
1Center for Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shiyingh@stanford.edu
Guoyu Tao
2Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William S. Pearson
2Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ilia Rochlin
3Inform and Disseminate Division, Office of Public Health Data, Surveillance, and Technology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert L. Phillips
4The Center for Professionalism & Value in Health Care, ABFM Foundation, Washington, DC
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David H. Rehkopf
1Center for Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
5Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
ScD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neil Kamdar
1Center for Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
6Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Baseline Characteristics of Patients With Chlamydia or Gonorrhea in Primary Care, Overall and by Treatment Status (2018-2022)

    ChlamydiaaGonorrheaa
    CharacteristicOverall (N = 6,678)Not treated (n = 1,650)Treated (n = 5,028)Overall (N = 2,206)Not treated (n = 671)Treated (n = 1,535)
    Gender, No. (%)
        Male1,827 (27.4)    599 (32.8)1,228 (67.2)    747 (33.9)    363 (48.6)    384 (51.4)
        Female4,845 (72.6)1,048 (21.6)3,797 (78.4)b1,459 (66.1)    308 (21.1)1,151 (78.9)
    Age group, No. (%)
        10-19 years1,829 (27.4)    427 (23.3)1,402 (76.7)    554 (25.1)    131 (23.6)    423 (76.4)
        20-29 years3,593 (53.8)    861 (24.0)2,732 (76.0)1,078 (48.9)    316 (29.3)    762 (70.7)
        30-39 years    841 (12.6)    232 (27.6)    609 (72.4)    334 (15.1)    123 (36.8)    211 (63.2)
        40-49 years    248 (3.7)      66 (26.6)    182 (73.4)    126 (5.7)      42 (33.3)      84 (66.7)
        50-59 years    123 (1.8)      46 (37.4)      77 (62.6)      87 (3.9)      48 (55.2)      39 (44.8)
        60-69 years      39 (0.6)      13 (33.3)      26 (66.7)      24 (1.1)    <11      15 (62.5)
        70-79 years    <11    <11        0 (0)    <11    <11    <11
        ≥80 years        0 (0)        0 (0)        0 (0)    <11    <11        0 (0)
    Race, No. (%)
        Asian      61 (0.9)      19 (31.1)      42 (68.9)      16 (0.7)    <16    <16
        Hispanic1,203 (18.0)    280 (23.3)    923 (76.7)    308 (14.0)      99 (32.1)    209 (67.9)
        Non-Hispanic Black1,527 (22.9)    412 (27.0)1,115 (73.0)    656 (29.7)    225 (34.3)    431 (65.7)
        Non-Hispanic White2,842 (42.6)    658 (23.2)2,184 (76.8)    877 (39.8)    232 (26.5)    645 (73.5)
        Other, unknown, missing1,045 (15.7)    281 (26.9)    764 (73.1)    349 (15.8)    109 (31.2)    240 (68.8)
    Residence, No. (%)c
        Urban4,179 (62.6)1,041 (24.9)3,138 (75.1)1,481 (67.1)    527 (35.6)    954 (64.4)
        Suburban1,159 (17.4)    261 (22.5)    898 (77.5)    430 (19.5)      71 (16.5)    359 (83.5)
        Rural1,325 (19.8)    344 (26.0)    981 (74.0)    289 (13.1)      67 (23.2)    222 (76.8)
        Unknown    <16    <16    <16    <16    <16        0 (0)
        SDI, median (IQR)d      57 (33-72)      57 (33-73)      57 (31-72)      57 (36-72)      59 (46-77)      57 (34-70)
    Coinfectione
        Yes1,299 (19.5)    304 (23.4)    995 (76.6)1,278 (57.9)    301 (23.6)    977 (76.4)
        No5,379 (80.6)1,346 (25.0)4,033 (75.0)    928 (42.1)    370 (39.9)    558 (60.1)
    • IQR = interquartile range; SDI = social deprivation index.

    • Notes: Treatment status was based on administration/prescription of treatment within 30 days after the positive test. American Family Cohort analysis requires cell suppression; therefore, for small cell sizes, we masked actual counts and proportions for cell sizes<16 (for adult patients) and <11 (for pediatric patients) but >1.

    • ↵a Group assignment was based on a positive test, although patients could have also had a diagnosis code for the infection.

    • ↵b Denominator was 5,025 patients because 3 patients were missing their gender identities.

    • ↵c Ascertained from percentage of population for the zip code: urban (>60% urban), rural (>60% rural), or suburban (40%-60% urban or rural).

    • ↵d Based on county. Possible values range from 1 to 100, with higher values indicating greater socioeconomic deprivation.

    • ↵e Coinfection with chlamydia and gonorrhea, based on positive test for the index infection (chlamydia or gonorrhea) plus an additional infection of the other type on the same date based on either a diagnosis code or a positive test.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Treatment Details for Patients With Chlamydia or Gonorrhea

    Treatment measureChlamydiaa (n = 6,678)Gonorrheaa (n = 2,206)Chlamydia with gonorrhea coinfectionb (n = 1,299)Gonorrhea with chlamydia coinfectionb (n = 1,278)
    Treated, No. (%)5,028 (75.3)1,535 (69.6)995 (76.6)977 (76.5)
    Time to treatmentc
    Within 7 days, No. (%)4,286 (85.2)1,296 (84.4)848 (85.2)811 (83.0)
    Within 8-15 days, No. (%)551 (11.0)171 (11.1)106 (10.7)118 (12.1)
    Within 16-30 days, No. (%)191 (3.8)68 (4.4)41 (4.1)48 (4.9)
    Median (IQR), days  3 (1-6)  3 (1-6)  3 (2-6)  4 (2-6)
    Mean (SD), days4.5 (4.8)4.6 (5.1)4.6 (4.9)4.9 (5.1)
    Chlamydia treatment
    Antibiotic regimen, No. (%)d
        Amoxicillin61 (1.2)NA                               <16NA
        Amoxicillin, azithromycin22 (0.4)                               <16
        Amoxicillin, doxycycline           <160 (0)
        Amoxicillin, doxycycline, levofloxacin0 (0)0 (0)
        Amoxicillin, levofloxacin           <16                               <16
        Azithromycin4,220 (83.9)876 (88.0)
        Azithromycin, doxycycline49 (1.0)                               <16
        Azithromycin, erythromycin           <160 (0)
        Azithromycin, levofloxacin           <16                               <16
        Doxycycline645 (12.8)88 (8.8)
        Doxycycline, erythromycin           <16                               <16
        Doxycycline, levofloxacin           <160 (0)
        Erythromycin           <16                               <16
        Levofloxacin           <160 (0)
        Multiple regimens, No. (%)e83 (1.7)21 (2.1)
    Recommended treatment of doxycycline, No. (%)
        Anyf702 (14.0)98 (9.8)
        As monotherapy645 (12.8)88 (8.8)
    Gonorrhea treatment
    Antibiotic regimen, No. (%)d
        AzithromycinNA914 (59.5)NA647 (66.2)
        Azithromycin, cefixime17 (1.1)                              <16
        Azithromycin, cefixime, ceftriaxone           <160 (0)
        Azithromycin, ceftriaxone390 (25.4)228 (23.3)
        Azithromycin, ceftriaxone, gentamicin           <160 (0)
        Azithromycin, gemifloxacin           <16                                 <16
        Cefixime           <16                                 <16
        Cefotaxime0 (0)0 (0)
        Ceftriaxone202 (13.2)92 (9.4)
        Ceftriaxone, gentamicin0 (0)0 (0)
        Gentamicin           <160 (0)
        Multiple regimens, No. (%)e412 (26.8)237 (24.3)
    Recommended treatment of ceftriaxone, No. (%)
        Anyg594 (38.7)
        As monotherapy202 (13.2)
    • IQR =interquartile range; NA = not applicable.

    • ↵a Group assignment was based on a positive test, although patients could have also had a diagnosis code for the infection.

    • ↵b Coinfection was based on positive test for the index infection (chlamydia or gonorrhea) plus an additional infection of the other type on the same date based on either a diagnosis code or a positive test.

    • ↵c Among patients who were treated.

    • ↵d American Family Cohort analysis requires cell suppression; therefore, for small cell sizes we performed masking of actual counts and proportions for cell sizes <16 (for adult patients) and <11 (for pediatric patients) but >1.

    • ↵e Received more than 1 regimen on the same day.

    • ↵f Any receipt of doxycycline, whether alone or in combination with other antibiotics. Any receipt of doxycycline was required for treatment to be classified as recommended treatment.

    • ↵g Any receipt of ceftriaxone, whether alone or in combination with other antibiotics. Any receipt of ceftriaxone was required for treatment to be classified as recommended treatment.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Fully Adjusted Time Ratios and Differences in Days to Treatment vs Reference Group for Patients With Chlamydia or Gonorrhea

    ChlamydiaaGonorrheaa
    CharacteristicTime ratio (95% Cl)bP valueDifference, dayscTime ratio (95% Cl)bP valueDifference, daysc
    SDI quintiled
        Quintile 1Ref…RefRef…Ref
        Quintile 20.94 (0.79-1.12).49−0.180.76 (0.56-1.05).10−0.71
        Quintile 30.91 (0.77-1.08).28−0.260.65 (0.48-0.87).00−1.05
        Quintile 41.12 (0.92-1.35).270.350.90 (0.64-1.26).53−0.31
        Quintile 51.02 (0.82-1.27).860.061.03 (0.70-1.53).880.10
    Age group
        10-19 years0.94 (0.85-1.04).21−0.180.90 (0.76-1.08).26−0.29
        20-29 yearsRef…RefRef…Ref
        30-39 years1.06 (0.94-1.21).350.191.09 (0.87-1.37).440.28
        40-49 years0.87 (0.70-1.10).25−0.380.72 (0.50-1.04).08−0.83
        50-59 years1.61 (1.12-2.30).011.821.38 (0.83-2.27).211.13
        60-69 years1.17 (0.63-2.17).620.500.57 (0.26-1.29).18−1.28
    Residence
        Urban0.96 (0.84-1.09).51−0.131.25 (1.02-1.53).030.74
        Rural1.06 (0.92-1.21).450.171.17 (0.92-1.49).190.52
        SuburbanRef…RefRef…Ref
    Race
        Asian0.98 (0.62-1.55).92−0.071.48 (0.51-4.33).471.45
        Hispanic0.98 (0.85-1.14).82−0.050.91 (0.68-1.22).53−0.27
        Non-Hispanic Black1.17 (1.04-1.33).010.520.91 (0.74-1.11).34−0.28
        WhiteRef…RefRef…Ref
        Other, unknown, missing1.36 (1.20-1.55).001.091.21 (0.97-1.51).090.63
    Sex: female (Ref = male)0.62 (0.55-0.70).00−1.140.38 (0.29-0.48).00−1.87
    Coinfection: yes (Ref = no)1.14 (1.02-1.28)e.020.430.89 (0.74-1.07)f.21−0.33
    • Ref = reference group; SDI = social deprivation index; STI = sexually transmitted infection.

    • Note: Assuming the median time to treatment of 3 days for chlamydia and 3 days for gonorrhea (Table 2).

    • ↵a Group assignment was based on a positive test, although patients could have also had a diagnosis code for the infection.

    • ↵b The ratio of the time to treatment between the indicated group and the reference group, adjusted for all other variables in this table. Estimated using a multivariate shared frailty parametric Weibull accelerated failure time (AFT) model to account for patients who may have had multiple STIs throughout the study period. Shared frailty models were estimated both with and without the shared frailty component, and the likelihood ratio test of the theta parameter indicated shared frailty effects existed; therefore, all final models accounted for multiple STI patient episodes that could have occurred during the study period.

    • ↵c The increase (in the case of positive values) or decrease (in the case of negative values) in number of days with respect to the median time to treatment of 3 days.

    • ↵d Range is from least deprived (quintile 1: SDI of 0-20) to most deprived (quintile 5: SDI of 81-100).

    • ↵e The time to treatment is based on the relevant antibiotics that would be prescribed for chlamydia, regardless of gonorrhea coinfection.

    • ↵f The time to treatment is based on the relevant antibiotics that would be prescribed for gonorrhea, regardless of chlamydia coinfection.

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • SUPPLEMENTAL DATA IN PDF FILE BELOW

    • Hao_Supp_App_Supp_Tables_1-4.pdf -

      Supplemental Appendix. The PRIME Registry

      Supplemental Table 1. List of all codes to identify chlamydia and gonorrhea infections

      Supplemental Table 2. List of all codes to identify confirmed tests

      Supplemental Table 3. List of all medications for chlamydia and gonorrhea to classify medication classes and detailed descriptions

      Supplemental Table 4. The fully adjusted time ratios as well as the difference in  number of days compared to fixed referent groups, for patients who received a diagnosis of chlamydia or gonorrhea without a confirmed positive test

  • PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY

    Original Research

    Many Patients With Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Are Not Receiving CDC-Recommended Treatment in Primary Care 

    Background and Goal:Prompt treatment of chlamydia and gonorrhea following a confirmed diagnosis is essential to prevent complications and reduce transmission. Adherence to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) treatment guidelines in primary care settings remains a concern. This study aimed to quantify the overall treatment rate for chlamydia and gonorrhea and identify factors associated with treatment delays and disparities. 

    Study Approach:Researchers analyzed electronic health record data from the PRIME registry, which includes information from over 2,000 primary care clinicians across the United States. The study included patients diagnosed with chlamydia or gonorrhea between 2018 and 2022 and assessed whether they received appropriate antibiotic treatment within 30 days of diagnosis.

    Main Results:6,678 cases of chlamydia and 2,206 cases of gonorrhea confirmed by a positive test were identified.

    • 75.3% of chlamydia cases and 69.6% of gonorrhea cases were treated within 30 days.

    • More than 80% of treated patients received antibiotics within 7 days of diagnosis.

    • Only 14% of chlamydia cases were treated with the recommended doxycycline and only 38.7% of gonorrhea cases were treated with the recommended ceftriaxone.

    • Women, young adults (ages 10-29), and suburban residents were more likely to receive treatment.

    • Time to treatment of chlamydia was longer for patients aged 50-59 years and for non-Hispanic Black patients.

    Why It Matters:Many patients with chlamydia and gonorrhea in primary care settings do not receive the recommended treatment. This gap in care may contribute to ongoing STI transmission and adverse health outcomes, particularly among marginalized populations. 

    Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Primary Care and Its Patient-Level Variation: An American Family Cohort Study

    Shiying Hao, PhD, et al

    Center for Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California 

    An accompanying episode of the Annals of Family Medicine Podcast, featuring study authors Shiying Hao, PhD, and Neil Kamdar, MA, will be available here beginning 9am EDT March 25.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 23 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 23 (2)
Vol. 23, Issue 2
Mar/April 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Plain-Language Summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Primary Care and Its Patient-Level Variation: An American Family Cohort Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Primary Care and Its Patient-Level Variation: An American Family Cohort Study
Shiying Hao, Guoyu Tao, William S. Pearson, Ilia Rochlin, Robert L. Phillips, David H. Rehkopf, Neil Kamdar
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2025, 23 (2) 136-144; DOI: 10.1370/afm.240164

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Primary Care and Its Patient-Level Variation: An American Family Cohort Study
Shiying Hao, Guoyu Tao, William S. Pearson, Ilia Rochlin, Robert L. Phillips, David H. Rehkopf, Neil Kamdar
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2025, 23 (2) 136-144; DOI: 10.1370/afm.240164
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Performance-Based Reimbursement, Illegitimate Tasks, Moral Distress, and Quality Care in Primary Care: A Mediation Model of Longitudinal Data
  • Adverse Outcomes Associated With Inhaled Corticosteroid Use in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Acute illness
  • Person groups:
    • Community / population health
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health services
  • Other topics:
    • Clinical practice guidelines

Keywords

  • chlamydia
  • gonorrhea
  • primary care
  • antibiotics
  • guideline adherence
  • nonadherence
  • clinical practice patterns
  • treatment delay
  • sexually transmitted disease
  • practice-based research
  • minority groups
  • vulnerable populations

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine