Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleMethodology

Enhance Your Team-Based Qualitative Research

Douglas H. Fernald and Christine W. Duclos
The Annals of Family Medicine July 2005, 3 (4) 360-364; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.290
Douglas H. Fernald
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine W. Duclos
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • New book of interest
    George Luber
    Published on: 18 August 2007
  • Re: Enhancing Team-based Qualitative Research
    Douglas H. Fernald
    Published on: 02 November 2005
  • Enhancing Team-based Qualitative Research
    Greg Guest
    Published on: 30 October 2005
  • A Much Needed Article
    Helen E. McIlvain
    Published on: 29 July 2005
  • Published on: (18 August 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for New book of interest
    New book of interest
    • George Luber, Atlanta, USA

    For any who are interested, a new book has just been published which elaborates on (and provides remedies for) the important issues outlined by Fernald and Duclos: Handbook for Team-based Qualitative Research (AltaMira Press). The book has received excellent reviews.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (2 November 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for Re: Enhancing Team-based Qualitative Research
    Re: Enhancing Team-based Qualitative Research
    • Douglas H. Fernald, Aurora, CO, USA

    Thank you, Greg and Kathleen, for your thoughtful comments. We appreciate your additional recommendations and would like to invite others to contribute any additional ideas.

    The reliability of the analysis is of definite concern when work is diffused across team members; your recommendation for standardized protocols and on-site training are excellent.

    We look forward to seeing your handbook next yea...

    Show More

    Thank you, Greg and Kathleen, for your thoughtful comments. We appreciate your additional recommendations and would like to invite others to contribute any additional ideas.

    The reliability of the analysis is of definite concern when work is diffused across team members; your recommendation for standardized protocols and on-site training are excellent.

    We look forward to seeing your handbook next year. Good luck!

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (30 October 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for Enhancing Team-based Qualitative Research
    Enhancing Team-based Qualitative Research
    • Greg Guest, USA
    • Other Contributors:

    Fernald and Duclos’ recent article on enhancing rigor in team-based qualitative research[1] is long overdue. Qualitative research studies, particularly those carried out in team settings, have increasingly become a part of health science research. Yet, as Fernald and Duclos accurately note, few published works exist that provide researchers with practical suggestions for improving the quality and integrity of such rese...

    Show More

    Fernald and Duclos’ recent article on enhancing rigor in team-based qualitative research[1] is long overdue. Qualitative research studies, particularly those carried out in team settings, have increasingly become a part of health science research. Yet, as Fernald and Duclos accurately note, few published works exist that provide researchers with practical suggestions for improving the quality and integrity of such research. As designers and managers of multi-site qualitative research, we have written many procedures and guidelines for enhancing qualitative research, but they have always been developed for specific research projects and taken the form of unpublished documents or manuals. So, we too have lamented the lack of a set of general methods for improving the management and outcome of team-based qualitative studies. We agree with many of the article’s suggestions, and applaud the authors’ initiative to bring the challenges and issues associated with team-based qualitative research to the forefront. From our own experience with multi-site research, especially multi-national projects, we offer some additional key points.

    Maintaining team cohesion and study integrity under increasingly globalized conditions and geographic dispersal of health research can not be easily achieved with frequent face-to-face team meetings. Conference calls are an option, but are limited in their ability to identify and solve the plethora of problems that inexorably arise during large research initiatives. In some parts of the world, they are also difficult to conduct due to poor communications infrastructure and extreme time zone differences. We have found that regular, face-to-face on-site visits are essential in multi-site projects, despite the costs, as is timely feedback to site collaborators on transcripts, field notes, summaries, and other materials. These overall coordination strategies are added to the kinds of steps outlined by Fernald and Duclos, which are in turn implemented at each field site as well as at our central project offices.

    Providing field teams with explicit structure can also mitigate many problems. Fernald and Duclos offer some general suggestions in this regard (e.g., scheduling regular team meetings, appointing one person as data manager, writing down code definitions). However, for team-based qualitative research, especially that which involves multiple sites, there are additional concerns with regard to the critical issue of reliability. When multiple interviewers and data analysts are involved, achieving a meaningful and reliable comparison of data across participants and sites can be problematic; as the authors point out, in qualitative research each individual may have a unique interviewing or analytical style. They go on to recommend that a team leader needs to “accommodate” these differences. We agree that qualitative research needs to be iterative and flexible, but we also recommend standardizing certain processes, within study protocols and through comprehensive training, that facilitate consistent and reliable data collection and analysis. In our research projects, we extend Fernald and Duclos’ recommendations for building a sense of common purpose by providing methodological training on-site to field staff (e.g., interviewing skills, data management procedures, research ethics), so team members at all sites share a similar understanding of the study objectives and data collection procedures. Subsequent training in data analysis augments that team building effort and the shared experience of implementing a common protocol. We also seek opportunities to bring together at least some members of the research team from each site. The monetary costs are high for international work but the end result is data that are richer and suitable for cross-site analysis.

    Other ways in which methodological consistency and data comparability can be achieved are by using a semi-structured instrument, to ensure that similar questions are asked of all participants, and using a standard transcription protocol[2]. Structure enhances reliability during data analysis as well. As Fernald and Duclos suggest, team members should write down code definitions, but we further recommend that they be given, or be asked to develop, a specific structure to guide how this is done[3]. We also note that one of the advantages of team-based qualitative research is the ability to work with multiple data coders and rigorously assess inter-coder agreement, an important issue in qualitative data analysis[4].

    With each new project we have undertaken, we have felt the need to consolidate the kind of systematic guidance that Fernald and Duclos outline in their article. To this end, we are in the process of writing and editing a collection of papers for a handbook for team-based qualitative research, which will provide an in-depth and comprehensive treatment of the subject. We expect the volume to be available in late 2006 (AltaMira Press).

    1. Fernald D, Duclos C. Enhance your team-based qualitative research. Annals of Family Medicine. 2005;3:360-364.

    2. McLellan E, MacQueen KM, Niedig J. Beyond the qualitative interview: data preparation and transcription. Field Methods. 2003;15:63- 84.

    3. MacQueen K, McLellan E, Kay K, Milstein B. Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. Cultural Anthropology Methods. 1998;10:31-36.

    4. Hruschka D, Schwartz D, Cobb St.John D, Picone-Decaro E, Jenkins R, Carey J. Reliability in coding open-ended data: lessons learned from HIV behavioral research. Field Methods. 2004; 16:307-331.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (29 July 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for A Much Needed Article
    A Much Needed Article
    • Helen E. McIlvain, Omaha, NE, USA

    I would like to congratulate the authors on their contribution to the qualitative methodology literature. This is the first article of its kind that I have seen to address this extremely important issue. I strongly support the use of multi-disciplinary teams to analyze qualitative data but doing so adds extra layers of complexity to an already complex process. This article provides a brief discussion of some of the majo...

    Show More

    I would like to congratulate the authors on their contribution to the qualitative methodology literature. This is the first article of its kind that I have seen to address this extremely important issue. I strongly support the use of multi-disciplinary teams to analyze qualitative data but doing so adds extra layers of complexity to an already complex process. This article provides a brief discussion of some of the major problems associated with this type of analysis and some exellent suggestions about how they can be avoided.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 3 (4)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 3 (4)
Vol. 3, Issue 4
1 Jul 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Enhance Your Team-Based Qualitative Research
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Enhance Your Team-Based Qualitative Research
Douglas H. Fernald, Christine W. Duclos
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2005, 3 (4) 360-364; DOI: 10.1370/afm.290

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Enhance Your Team-Based Qualitative Research
Douglas H. Fernald, Christine W. Duclos
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2005, 3 (4) 360-364; DOI: 10.1370/afm.290
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Study protocol for the development and internal validation of Schizophrenia Prediction of Resistance to Treatment (SPIRIT): a clinical tool for predicting risk of treatment resistance to antipsychotics in first-episode schizophrenia
  • Study protocol for the development and internal validation of SPIRIT (Schizophrenia Prediction of Resistance to Treatment): A clinical tool for predicting risk of treatment resistance to anti-psychotics in First Episode Schizophrenia
  • Exploring womens experiences of identifying, negotiating and managing perinatal anxiety: a qualitative study
  • Rural Family Medicine Clinicians' Motivations to Participate in a Pragmatic Obesity Trial
  • An Exploration of Pharmacy Education Researchers Perceptions and Experiences Conducting Qualitative Research
  • Is the current surge in political and financial attention to One Health solidifying or splintering the movement?
  • Riding the wave of primary care research: Development of a primary health care research centre
  • In This Issue: Patient Outcomes, the Process of Care, and the Capacity for Innovation
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Joint Display of Integrated Data Collection for Mixed Methods Research: An Illustration From a Pediatric Oncology Quality Improvement Study
  • Patient-Guided Tours: A Patient-Centered Methodology to Understand Patient Experiences of Health Care
  • Putting Evidence Into Practice: An Update on the US Preventive Services Task Force Methods for Developing Recommendations for Preventive Services
Show more Methodology

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Qualitative methods
  • Other topics:
    • Research capacity building

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine