Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
EditorialEditorials

Misaligned Incentives in America’s Health: Who’s Minding the Store?

Steven M. Teutsch and Marc L. Berger
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2005, 3 (6) 485-487; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.408
Steven M. Teutsch
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc L. Berger
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • RESTITUTING PRIMARY CARE AND THE DISCIPLINE OF FAMILY MEDICINE
    Dr. Rajesh Chauhan. MBBS, DFM, ADHA, FCGP, FISCD, FAIMS.
    Published on: 10 December 2005
  • Public Health, Wealth, Culture and Social Structure in the U.S. of A
    Jeffrey B Shaw
    Published on: 09 December 2005
  • Tests vs medical care
    Susanna F Buchanan MD
    Published on: 07 December 2005
  • Published on: (10 December 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for RESTITUTING PRIMARY CARE AND THE DISCIPLINE OF FAMILY MEDICINE
    RESTITUTING PRIMARY CARE AND THE DISCIPLINE OF FAMILY MEDICINE
    • Dr. Rajesh Chauhan. MBBS, DFM, ADHA, FCGP, FISCD, FAIMS., 309/9 A.V. Colony, Sikandra, Agra -282007. INDIA

    Dear Editor,

    The editorial dealing with failing health care [1] is interesting and thought provoking. Here are some of the points that came to my mind impromptu, which may probably boost up the health care and also help in decreasing the costs of medicare:-

    • WHERE TO START: A start can be made by making medical education much cheaper than it is at present. Anyone who has been burdened with a heft...

    Show More

    Dear Editor,

    The editorial dealing with failing health care [1] is interesting and thought provoking. Here are some of the points that came to my mind impromptu, which may probably boost up the health care and also help in decreasing the costs of medicare:-

    • WHERE TO START: A start can be made by making medical education much cheaper than it is at present. Anyone who has been burdened with a hefty loan while completing his or her medical studies is bound to make good this huge investment. Moreover a systematic review of pay package should be done regularly. Medical profession is different, requiring total commitment, dedication, time, efforts, untiring efficiency, and above all deep concern and regards for the human sufferings and human life. By preferring to take up a medical career, one can be sure that the person has not considered about financial rewards as much as is made out, since far less efforts could have provided better returns in any other field other than the medical field, had it been the choice and thus otherwise decided at the outset. Try giving a doctor respectable financial rewards/remunerations so that he does not have to worry every now and then and also does not feel hurt when seeing someone doing better with only half the efforts or even less.

    • SELF SUFFICIENCY: By making medical education a lot cheaper than its present status, probably there shall be no further requirement of “poaching” doctors and the country can turn self sufficient in this aspect. Many students may like to pursue medical career as their first choice but are probably unable to do so for very high initial costs of studies that may be frightening to them. However, the criteria of selecting only the motivated and the best should be followed.

    • RESTORING & IMPROVING COMPETENCY OF FAMILY MEDICINE: Make the discipline of Family Medicine more potent and versatile. A patient of any age or sex should feel comfortable walking up to a Family Medicine expert for any disease involving any part of body or any of the body systems. Probably because competency is restrained, by way of established conventions, legislations and possibly due to fear of legal consequences, Family Medicine practice seems stifled. Efforts to make it flourish may be set in motion and further dichotomies and branching of super- specialties need to be avoided. Patients should feel that once they visit their Family Medicine specialist, their problems shall be taken care of, without undue need of further referrals to a super-specialist. Laboratory and radiological backup may be provided so that once a diagnosis is reached, Family Physician can straight away prescribe the needful management. Patients requiring hospital admissions and care should be referred and opportunity to seek second opinion should be freely available. Strides in e-health and information technology can help the latter aspect. Evolution began with a notochord that became the backbone. Family Medicine should retain its present form of being a central structure around which the complete medicare revolves, rather it turning back into an indistinguishable jelly.

    • REJUVENATION OF TERTIARY CARE: Rejuvenation of District Hospitals will provide the required backing to Family Medicine practitioners and it can provide the secondary and tertiary levels of care. Establishment of super-specialty hospitals catering for defined geographical zones can provide the required super-specialty support.

    • DRUG MANUFACTURING: Let the pharmaceutical companies continue producing better products. However, once a “prototype” is produced and duly vetted, the same may be handed over to the government for mass production in its own factories/companies, that may be established. This will bring down the costs of drugs as well as will encourage pharmaceutical industries to keep looking for better and more effective remedies and shall be freed from the pressures of their marketing and distribution.

    • HEALTH INSURANCE: Health should be retained as a state subject. Health insurance can be outsourced a single agency or taken over by the government itself, thereby providing conformity and universality. Although profits will be less, but shear volumes can keep the coffers overflowing, making it more accessible and affordable to all. Ideally the poor, orphans, unemployed, displaced, and the old and should keep getting free health care.

    • OTHER COSTS CUTTING MEASURES: Over-care, over-investigations and over-prescribing should be avoided to cut down unnecessary costs. These are not helpful to patients also. Further, self-help wherever tenable, should be encouraged.

    • END RESULT: End result would be a better health care, universal at that, with far less government spending and reduced calls for separate budget allocations. It shall also reinstitute and restore patient confidence and improve clientele satisfaction levels, simultaneously reducing the spiraling costs of medicare.

    With warm regards.

    Reference:

    1. Teutsch SM, Berger ML. Misaligned Incentives in America’s Health: Who’s Minding the Store? Annals of Family Medicine 2005; 3: 485 -487.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (9 December 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for Public Health, Wealth, Culture and Social Structure in the U.S. of A
    Public Health, Wealth, Culture and Social Structure in the U.S. of A
    • Jeffrey B Shaw, Centerville,Ohio,USA

    Academic medicine and frontline medicine have never been farther apart.

    Forced by educational "dinosaur" institutions, medical professionals in all fields leave with huge educational debts and the promise of good pay with little experience in direct patient care coming at the end of their training.

    The Plebes, i.e. the patient techs, medical assts, LPN's, PT assts, phlebotomists, and other ancillar...

    Show More

    Academic medicine and frontline medicine have never been farther apart.

    Forced by educational "dinosaur" institutions, medical professionals in all fields leave with huge educational debts and the promise of good pay with little experience in direct patient care coming at the end of their training.

    The Plebes, i.e. the patient techs, medical assts, LPN's, PT assts, phlebotomists, and other ancillary health care providers are usually given a fourth to third less training and yet provide the bulk of the day to day "labor". This clash is seen daily in the interactions of the "customers" who must call, talk and plead with these individuals on the frontline to receive their care and treatments from their medical professional providers who by the way must now become business professionals to understand the bureaucracy of insurance and government regulation. The mathematical possibilities are endless for good and poor quality care.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (7 December 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for Tests vs medical care
    Tests vs medical care
    • Susanna F Buchanan MD, Salisbury, MD USA
    • Other Contributors:

    My physician uses my semi annual visit to be sure I have had my mammogram, flu shot, stool occult blood, routine lab work, etc, things which could be done by a computer in the waiting room, or the assistant who took my blood pressure. She does not question me about my home blood pressure monitoring, my drug side effects, changes in my health, etc. This is not good medical care, yet very likely she is being "graded" on...

    Show More

    My physician uses my semi annual visit to be sure I have had my mammogram, flu shot, stool occult blood, routine lab work, etc, things which could be done by a computer in the waiting room, or the assistant who took my blood pressure. She does not question me about my home blood pressure monitoring, my drug side effects, changes in my health, etc. This is not good medical care, yet very likely she is being "graded" on these mechanistic things, with the assumption that "good medical Care" will follow. So far, it has not!

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 3 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 3 (6)
Vol. 3, Issue 6
1 Nov 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Annual Indexes
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Misaligned Incentives in America’s Health: Who’s Minding the Store?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Misaligned Incentives in America’s Health: Who’s Minding the Store?
Steven M. Teutsch, Marc L. Berger
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2005, 3 (6) 485-487; DOI: 10.1370/afm.408

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Misaligned Incentives in America’s Health: Who’s Minding the Store?
Steven M. Teutsch, Marc L. Berger
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2005, 3 (6) 485-487; DOI: 10.1370/afm.408
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • In This Issue: Trade-Offs, Time Use, Depression Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Thank You, Reviewers and Commenters
  • Recruiting, Educating, and Taking Primary Care to Rural Communities
  • Returning to a Patient-Centered Approach in the Management of Hypothyroidism
Show more Editorials

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • Translational research
    • Professional practice

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine