Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
OtherReflections

The Break-Even Point: When Medical Advances Are Less Important Than Improving the Fidelity With Which They Are Delivered

Steven H. Woolf and Robert E. Johnson
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2005, 3 (6) 545-552; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.406
Steven H. Woolf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert E. Johnson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • House of Cards
    Sam Diago
    Published on: 06 January 2006
  • The Best of Times and the Worst of Times
    Mary K Wakefield
    Published on: 24 December 2005
  • Another example - pap smears
    Ed Miron
    Published on: 07 December 2005
  • Published on: (6 January 2006)
    Page navigation anchor for House of Cards
    House of Cards
    • Sam Diago, Detroit, MI USA

    A very thoughtful analysis on "Technology vs. Fidelity." However the authors expect us to swallow a bitter pill.

    The premise is grounded on sand. There are too many assumptions that have been proven nonviable.

    1. Rational people can't believe we can do a better job of socialism than socialist countries. They have all failed.

    2. Are we expected to believe the 45 million uninsured are the sam...

    Show More

    A very thoughtful analysis on "Technology vs. Fidelity." However the authors expect us to swallow a bitter pill.

    The premise is grounded on sand. There are too many assumptions that have been proven nonviable.

    1. Rational people can't believe we can do a better job of socialism than socialist countries. They have all failed.

    2. Are we expected to believe the 45 million uninsured are the same 45 million year after year?

    3. How many of the 45 million choose not to have medical insurance?

    4. The reference to "moral imperatives & ethics of utilitarianism" get to the heart of the issue...society can not "marshal" (authors' word) resources without coercion and force, (marshal law?) two ideas that MUST NOT be tolerated in a free society.

    Competing interests:   non socialist

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (24 December 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for The Best of Times and the Worst of Times
    The Best of Times and the Worst of Times
    • Mary K Wakefield, Grand Forks, ND, USA

    The authors draw a sharp line between the return on investment in technological innovation versus investments in system improvement to ensure that people get timely appropriate care(authors refer to this as fidelity). Without a doubt, many in the public and policymaking arenas have come to equate high quality care with technology improvement, without paying much attention to the care systems on which the application of th...

    Show More

    The authors draw a sharp line between the return on investment in technological innovation versus investments in system improvement to ensure that people get timely appropriate care(authors refer to this as fidelity). Without a doubt, many in the public and policymaking arenas have come to equate high quality care with technology improvement, without paying much attention to the care systems on which the application of that technology rests. How do we help to move toward a more appropriate balanced investment? For starters, to the extent health care providers, researchers and others 'turn up the volume' on the importance and value of system functionality that supports appropriate, timely care, the message won't necessarily be lost on important stakeholders. And, as the authors note, public discouragement with health care may also help to catalyze fiscal policy realignment. In fact, some recent federal actions do acknowledge the importance of investing in related improvements and measuring progress against established indicators. Having said that, we nevertheless clearly have a long way to go. In addition to the dynamic so well articulated by the authors describing the fascination with technological breakthroughs and the related lack of adequate thought given to real impact and tradeoffs, another major challenge to moving this discussion forward is the fragmented health care and health policy world in which we live. Our current approaches to health care investment are too often based on slivers of targeted activity rather than more comprehesive assessment and phased-in actions. Instead, we need a 'systematic approach' to critically analyzing health care broadly, including the 'system' features that are essential to ensuring that care is timely and appropriate. Without the bigger picture in focus, tradeoffs that are made are hidden--except for the occasional article, like this one, that illuminates some of them.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (7 December 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for Another example - pap smears
    Another example - pap smears
    • Ed Miron, Calhoun, GA

    Great article.

    Another classic example of efficacy vs fidelity is the common use of Thin- Prep paps by physicians who do annual gynecological exams on well patients. This more expensive tchnology is undoubtably more sensitive, but I question whether it has saved any lives from cervical cancer when used in this way. The way to save lives from cervical cancer is to screen women who don't routinely recieve it....

    Show More

    Great article.

    Another classic example of efficacy vs fidelity is the common use of Thin- Prep paps by physicians who do annual gynecological exams on well patients. This more expensive tchnology is undoubtably more sensitive, but I question whether it has saved any lives from cervical cancer when used in this way. The way to save lives from cervical cancer is to screen women who don't routinely recieve it.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 3 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine
Vol. 3, Issue 6
1 Nov 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Annual Indexes
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Break-Even Point: When Medical Advances Are Less Important Than Improving the Fidelity With Which They Are Delivered
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 14 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Break-Even Point: When Medical Advances Are Less Important Than Improving the Fidelity With Which They Are Delivered
Steven H. Woolf, Robert E. Johnson
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2005, 3 (6) 545-552; DOI: 10.1370/afm.406

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
The Break-Even Point: When Medical Advances Are Less Important Than Improving the Fidelity With Which They Are Delivered
Steven H. Woolf, Robert E. Johnson
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2005, 3 (6) 545-552; DOI: 10.1370/afm.406
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • SOCIETY’S PRIORITIES
    • HEALTH GAINS OF EFFICACY AND FIDELITY IN PERSPECTIVE
    • IS THE COMPARISON FAIR?
    • LIMITATIONS
    • COMPETING AGENDAS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • When Words Fail: Love’s Rightful Place in Medicine
  • Gifts From Unexpected Places
  • Sam’s Story: The Financial and Human Costs of Disjointed Logics of Care
Show more Reflections

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Person groups:
    • Community / population health
  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • POEMs
    • Translational research
    • Professional practice
  • Other topics:
    • Ethics

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2022 Annals of Family Medicine