Primary Care Practice-Based Research Comes of Age in the United States

David Lanier

doi:10.1370/afm.338

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article

Compose eLetter

Title *

Author Information

Contributors
First Name and Middle Initial * First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'. Last Name * Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'. Email Address * Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com Occupation * Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Affiliation * Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.

Statement of Competing Interests

Competing interests? *

Yes

Please describe the competing interests

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

What code is in the image? *

Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

The Need for Sustaining Financing and Appropirate Protections for Patients and Practices
Larry A. Green

Published on: 10 June 2005

Published on: (10 June 2005)
Page navigation anchor for The Need for Sustaining Financing and Appropirate Protections for Patients and Practices
The Need for Sustaining Financing and Appropirate Protections for Patients and Practices
Larry A. Green, Denver, USA
This supplement should go a long way toward allaying remaining doubts about the feasibility, importance, and potential of PBRN's. Taken as a group, the articles in the supplement plead for further action, especially in 2 areas:
1. Commitments are necessary now by medical schools, hospitals, NIH, CDC, and AHRQ to invest in sustaining funding for the core functions of primary care practice based research networks....
Show More

This supplement should go a long way toward allaying remaining doubts about the feasibility, importance, and potential of PBRN's. Taken as a group, the articles in the supplement plead for further action, especially in 2 areas:
1. Commitments are necessary now by medical schools, hospitals, NIH, CDC, and AHRQ to invest in sustaining funding for the core functions of primary care practice based research networks. It is somewhat painful to see the estimates offered as to the amount of money it would take to stabilize these critical laboratories--so little for so much. Yet, who will step up?
2. A united, positive statement about a better way to protect human subjects in practice-based research (whether patients, physicians, practice staff) is desperately needed. These articles expose a great deal of oscillating activity that in the end may totally miss the target of protecting people involved in research, while bleeding away precious and scarce resources and/or forfeiting important research possiblities for inadequate reasons. Perhaps the networks could propose their own best thinking about what approach and specific steps should be taken to protect human subjects while practices actively learn and improve the care of their patients.
Competing interests: None declared
Show Less

Competing Interests: None declared.