Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Quality of Preventive Care for Diabetes: Effects of Visit Frequency and Competing Demands

Joshua J. Fenton, Michael Von Korff, Elizabeth H.B. Lin, Paul Ciechanowski and Bessie A. Young
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2006, 4 (1) 32-39; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.421
Joshua J. Fenton
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Von Korff
ScD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth H.B. Lin
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Ciechanowski
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bessie A. Young
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Visit behavior may reflect self-care abilities
    Elizabeth A. Bayliss
    Published on: 01 February 2006
  • Understanding competing demands: co-morbidities need to be explored
    Joseph W LeMaster
    Published on: 01 February 2006
  • Next steps in transforming diabetes care
    Richard W Grant
    Published on: 01 February 2006
  • Published on: (1 February 2006)
    Page navigation anchor for Visit behavior may reflect self-care abilities
    Visit behavior may reflect self-care abilities
    • Elizabeth A. Bayliss, Denver, CO

    In their article, Quality of Preventive Care for Diabetes: Effects of Visit Frequency and Competing Demands, Fenton et al. discuss measures of diabetes care as a function of number and type of visit frequency.(1) The authors hypothesize that “infrequent” or “lower priority” outpatient visits will result in decreased diabetes preventive care. The assumption underlying these hypotheses (mine, not stated by the authors) is t...

    Show More

    In their article, Quality of Preventive Care for Diabetes: Effects of Visit Frequency and Competing Demands, Fenton et al. discuss measures of diabetes care as a function of number and type of visit frequency.(1) The authors hypothesize that “infrequent” or “lower priority” outpatient visits will result in decreased diabetes preventive care. The assumption underlying these hypotheses (mine, not stated by the authors) is that receipt of diabetes preventive care is in some way a function of the outpatient office visit. This assumption prompts two questions: Are type and number of visits actually proxies for something else? And, is there anything about receipt of diabetes preventive care that requires an outpatient visit?

    Diabetes preventive care largely consists of chronic disease self- care which is defined as follows: Engaging in activities that promote physical and psychological health; interacting with health care providers and adherence to treatment recommendations; monitoring health status and making associated care decisions; and managing the impact of the illness on physical, psychological and social functioning.(2) Patient-initiated visit behavior may reflect patients’ relative abilities or inabilities to perform adequate self-care. “Low priority” users have difficulty monitoring health status and making associated care decisions (e.g. appropriate triage of low priority conditions), and “infrequent users” have low levels of interaction with health care providers. It would be interesting to assess, in these sub-populations, levels of patient activation and other factors that are known to influence successful chronic disease self-care.

    The authors comment that providers’ competing demands during the office visit for lower priority conditions may detract from recommending diabetes preventive care. However, subjects in this investigation that had equal numbers of office visits with ‘higher priority’ concerns could have presented their providers with just as many competing demands. I would suggest that both the patient and the provider have their own set of ‘competing demands’ and that these are likely not the same.

    I agree with the authors that innovations in care delivery are required to deliver adequate diabetes preventive care. Patients’ priorities will often differ from objective societal priorities, and patients’ and providers will inevitably have (varying) competing demands. All of these priorities and agendas are important and many of them will need to be addressed face to face in the office visit. However scheduling hemoglobin a1c tests and retinal screening do not. Interventions to improve diabetes preventive care need to be two-fold and include both efforts to facilitate improved self-care, combined with systems to remind and contact patients, and track specific preventive services outside of the office visit.

    (1) Fenton JJ, vonKorff M, Lin EHB, Ciechanowski P, Young BA. Quality of preventive care for diabetes: effects of visit frequency and competing demands. Ann Fam Med 2006;4:32-39

    (2) Clark NM, Becker MH, Janz NK, Lorig KR, Rakowski W, Anderson L. Self-management of chronic disease by older adults: A review and questions for research. Journal of Aging Health 1991; 3:3-27.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (1 February 2006)
    Page navigation anchor for Understanding competing demands: co-morbidities need to be explored
    Understanding competing demands: co-morbidities need to be explored
    • Joseph W LeMaster, Columbia, MO USA

    Investigating how competing demands affect delivery of diabetes preventive services and self-care is a complex undertaking. Three articles in this issue of the Annals address the role of competing demands on diabetes preventive service delivery or self-care. Parchman et. al. used direct observation of patient visits and found that patients presenting for acute versus chronic illnesses less frequently received indicated...

    Show More

    Investigating how competing demands affect delivery of diabetes preventive services and self-care is a complex undertaking. Three articles in this issue of the Annals address the role of competing demands on diabetes preventive service delivery or self-care. Parchman et. al. used direct observation of patient visits and found that patients presenting for acute versus chronic illnesses less frequently received indicated preventive services (e.g. HbA1c testing) during the visit, suggesting that symptomatic complaints distracted the physician and patient from discussing less urgent diabetes prevention.1 Although the investigators controlled for the number of co-morbid conditions, they did not explore the possibility that certain co-morbidities may have been more distracting than others. Fenton et. al., who also report in this issue, examined a large cohort over multiple clinic visits. They found that patients whose main visit diagnosis was coded as a “low-priority” condition or a symptom were less likely to receive diabetes preventive care, i.e. that physicians were distracted from providing such care because the treatment for the condition was less clear.2 While those investigators used a more complex strategy to control for co-morbidity (the RxRisk score), they did not investigate how specific co-morbidities affected care. In the study by Lin et. al, participants randomized to depression care did not improve diabetes self-care or medication compliance.3 Certain combinations of co- morbidities may interact differently to affect health outcomes,4,5 suggesting that adjusting for co-morbidity is very complex. Fried has suggested that investigation of the interaction of the specific co-morbid diseases on health or process outcomes may be more enlightening than adjusting for their joint effects.4 As Lin et. al. suggest, the effect of competing demands on diabetic preventive care may best be clarified by large prospective clinical trials that use an individually-tailored approach that specifically targets each patient’s needs. Further research is urgently needed on this topic.

    Bibliography

    1. Parchman ML, Romero RL, Pugh JA. Encounters by patients with type 2 diabetes--complex and demanding: an observational study. Ann Fam Med 2006; 4(1):40-45. 2. Fenton JJ, Von Korff M, Lin EHB, Ciechanowski P, Young BA. Quality of preventive care for diabetes: effects of visit frequency and competing demands. Ann Fam Med 2006; 4(1):32-39. 3. Lin EHB, Katon W, Rutter C, Simon GE, Ludman EJ, Von Korff M, et al. Effects of enhanced depression treatment on diabetes self-care. Ann Fam Med 2006; 4(1):46-53. 4. Fried LP, Bandeen-Roche K, Kasper JD, Guralnik JM. Association of comorbidity with disability in older women: the Women's Health and Aging Study. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52(1):27-37. 5. Volpato S, Blaum C, Resnick H, Ferrucci L, Fried LP, Guralnik JM, et al. Comorbidities and impairments explaining the association between diabetes and lower extremity disability: The Women's Health and Aging Study. Diabetes Care 2002;25(4):678-683.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (1 February 2006)
    Page navigation anchor for Next steps in transforming diabetes care
    Next steps in transforming diabetes care
    • Richard W Grant, Boston, MA

    In theory, preventive care for patients with diabetes is so simple – order a blood test or two, vaccinate, look at the feet and refer for retinal exam – it boggles the mind that all patients with diabetes do not routinely receive all such services each year. The very simplicity of the required tasks, however, suggests that system-level barriers rather than inadequate physician education or training underlie the gap betwe...

    Show More

    In theory, preventive care for patients with diabetes is so simple – order a blood test or two, vaccinate, look at the feet and refer for retinal exam – it boggles the mind that all patients with diabetes do not routinely receive all such services each year. The very simplicity of the required tasks, however, suggests that system-level barriers rather than inadequate physician education or training underlie the gap between ideal and actual care. With this insight, it is clear that efforts to overcome barriers to effective diabetes management must first delve into the fine details of actual care.

    This current issue of Annals of Family Medicine presents a series of reports that focus on such details of care. Among these studies, the paper by Fenton et al takes an innovative analytic approach to understanding why patients fall short of preventive goals. Although it really only takes a single visit to perform all required actions for preventive services, Fenton et al found that patients and doctors have to cross paths multiple times over the course of a year to ensure that all goals get met. The real insight from this paper is that it’s not just the quantity but also the quality of the visits that matter. That is, patients with frequent visits for low priority problems are less likely to receive preventive services that have been shown over the long run to have the greatest impact on overall health. This distinction provides quantitative evidence for the role of competing demands in hindering effective diabetes care. Parchman et al take a direct observational approach to “look under the hood” of the care interaction. This study confirms the role of competing demands in sidetracking the goals of diabetes care. Given enough time during a visit focused on chronic disease management, patients tend to receive high quality care.

    So what are the innovative models and new approaches to change care? Other studies have confirmed the powerful role of a good patient-doctor relationship that has been developed over time and is characterized by good communication. Rather than “carving out” diabetes-related services to be taken care of by specialists and their support staff, perhaps the next step is to give primary care doctors and their patients enough time during a set-aside visit to focus specifically on diabetes management goals each year. Such a change would require a system for tracking patients with diabetes, scheduling diabetes visits, and a reimbursement mechanism that would remove the “time crunch” experienced by providers during their hectic workday.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 4 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 4 (1)
Vol. 4, Issue 1
1 Jan 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • The Issue in Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Quality of Preventive Care for Diabetes: Effects of Visit Frequency and Competing Demands
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Quality of Preventive Care for Diabetes: Effects of Visit Frequency and Competing Demands
Joshua J. Fenton, Michael Von Korff, Elizabeth H.B. Lin, Paul Ciechanowski, Bessie A. Young
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2006, 4 (1) 32-39; DOI: 10.1370/afm.421

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Quality of Preventive Care for Diabetes: Effects of Visit Frequency and Competing Demands
Joshua J. Fenton, Michael Von Korff, Elizabeth H.B. Lin, Paul Ciechanowski, Bessie A. Young
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2006, 4 (1) 32-39; DOI: 10.1370/afm.421
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Effect of physical activity counselling on the number of contacts in primary healthcare, specialised healthcare and the related healthcare costs among patients with type 2 diabetes: a register-based evaluation study
  • Trends in Receipt of American Diabetes Association Guideline-Recommended Care Among U.S. Adults With Diabetes: NHANES 2005-2018
  • Health Insurance Is Associated With Preventive Care but Not Personal Health Behaviors
  • Does Diabetes Care Differ by Type of Chronic Comorbidity?: An evaluation of the Piette and Kerr framework
  • Electronic Health Records vs Medicaid Claims: Completeness of Diabetes Preventive Care Data in Community Health Centers
  • TOP Docs: Family Physicians with Competing Demands and the Right Priorities--Individual, Family, and Community Health
  • In This Issue: Diabetes Quality of Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
  • Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?
  • Feasibility and Acceptability of the “About Me” Care Card as a Tool for Engaging Older Adults in Conversations About Cognitive Impairment
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
    • Prevention
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health services

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine