Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Services Provided by Family Physicians for Patients With Occupational Injuries and Illnesses

Jong Uk Won and Allard E. Dembe
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2006, 4 (2) 138-147; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.515
Jong Uk Won
MD, DrPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allard E. Dembe
ScD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Weighted Percentage Distributions of Office Visits, by Physician Category, NAMCS Data, 1997–2000

    Physician CategoryVisits for Work-Related Conditions (n = 2,387)Visits for Non–Work-Related Conditions (n = 93,796)
    NAMCS = National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.
    General practice
        Family practice (FP)22.021.5
        Family practice–geriatric medicine (FPG)0.00.1
        Family practice–sports medicine (FSM)0.00.0
        General practice (GP)1.03.2
    Internal medicine8.916.6
    Pediatrics0.211.7
    General surgery2.42.5
    Obstetrics and gynecology0.09.0
    Orthopedic surgery33.74.3
    Cardiovascular diseases0.12.4
    Dermatology0.44.1
    Urology0.12.2
    Psychiatry2.83.0
    Neurology2.61.0
    Occupational medicine7.50.0
    Ophthalmology1.16.0
    Otolaryngology1.02.3
    Other16.210.7
    Total100.0100.0
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Patient Characteristics, Weighted Percentage of Office Visits, NAMCS Data, 1997–2000

    Visit Type
    Patient CharacteristicFP-WR* (n = 326)OP-WR (n = 2,061)OccMed-WR (n = 180)FP-NWR (n = 12,865)
    Note: For ethnicity, some values were missing, so percentages do not add up to 100%.
    NAMCS = National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; FP-WR = visit to family practice physician for work-related condition; OP-WR = visit to non–family practice physician for work-related condition; OccMed-WR = visit to occupational medicine physician for work-related condition; FP-NWR = visit to family practice physician for non–work-related condition.
    * Reference category for comparison.
    † P <.05
    ‡ P <.01
    § P <.001
    Age, y, %
        ≤141.30.90.014.4§
        15–2412.78.1‡7.0§9.7
        25–4454.552.162.3†27.6§
        45–6427.235.3†30.727.0
        65–743.12.90.0†10.9‡
        ≥751.20.80.010.5§
    Age, mean, y39.541.2‡39.442.6‡
    Sex, %
        Female38.139.039.658.3§
        Male61.961.060.441.7§
    Race, %
        White84.983.774.9†89.8†
        Black13.412.817.87.8‡
        Asian/Pacific Islander1.02.33.4†2.0
        American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut0.81.33.9†0.4
    Ethnicity, %
        Hispanic8.614.0‡25.5§7.3
        Not Hispanic71.064.865.670.8
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Medical Care Characteristics, Percentage of Office Visits, NAMCS Data, 1997–2000

    Visit Type
    Medical Care CharacteristicFP-WR* (n = 326)OP-WR (n = 2,061)OccMed-WR (n = 180)FP-NWR (n = 12,865)
    NAMCS = National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; ICD-9 = International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision; FP-WR = visit to family practice physician for work-related condition; OP-WR = visit to non–family practice physician for work-related condition; OccMed-WR = visit to occupational medicine physician for work-related condition; FP-NWR = visit to family practice physician for non–work-related condition; RN = registered nurse; LPN = licensed practical nurse; HMO = health maintenance organization.
    * Reference category for comparison.
    † P <.05
    ‡ P <.01
    § P <.001
    Major reason for visit
        Acute problem55.335.4§48.548.4†
        Chronic problem, routine16.920.77.1§22.7†
        Chronic problem, flare-up10.59.15.4‡8.7
        Presurgery or postsurgery/injury follow-up12.230.4§36.1§2.4§
        Non-illness (eg, routine prenatal, general examination, well-baby)3.52.11.816.1‡
    Patient’s chief complaints and symptoms
        Musculoskeletal symptoms46.550.750.810.3§
        Injury or poisoning28.516.0§25.32.7§
    Physician’s diagnosis of patient’s condition (ICD-9 groupings)
        Infectious and parasitic diseases0.10.20.03.5§
        Neoplasm0.00.10.01.2
        Endocrine, nutritional, metabolic, and immune disorders0.00.20.07.3§
        Mental disorders1.14.0§1.03.8§
        Diseases of nervous system, sense organs5.56.72.7‡5.7
        Diseases of circulatory system1.50.5†0.09.6§
        Diseases of respiratory system1.70.5‡0.019.4§
        Diseases of digestive system0.61.30.83.9†
        Diseases of genitourinary system0.50.10.04.7‡
        Diseases of skin, subcutaneous tissue, hair, nails1.21.20.04.4§
        Diseases of musculoskeletal system, connective tissue25.328.928.58.0§
        Symptoms, signs, and ill-defined conditions1.82.52.07.1§
        Injury and poisoning54.043.9‡58.86.4§
        Supplementary classification and other diagnoses6.19.85.414.1†
    Visit was related to a specific injury or poisoning94.189.495.210.2§
        Visit was related to a self-inflicted injury or poisoning0.00.40.00.0
        Patient’s condition resulted from an assault2.42.11.3†0.1§
    Services provided during visit
        Diagnostic and screening services72.256.6§74.380.8‡
        Blood pressure reading57.224.2§54.666.7†
        Radiograph20.021.221.86.3§
        Therapeutic and preventive services46.050.368.7§36.7†
        Exercise counseling and education14.914.214.913.1
        Injury prevention counseling and education15.413.543.5§2.9§
        Mental health counseling and education0.82.1†0.02.4§
        Surgical procedures4.52.6‡2.62.6
    Therapy provided during visit
        Physiotherapy19.623.632.7‡2.5§
        Psychotherapy0.03.6§1.3†0.7
        Psychopharmacotherapy0.33.2‡0.00.5
    At least 1 drug was prescribed during the visit65.246.7§52.876.3§
    Medical professionals seen during the visit
        Physician96.396.894.295.1
        Physician assistant1.02.7†0.1§1.7
        Nurse-practitioner2.10.5‡0.01.8
        Nurse-midwife0.00.10.30.1
        RN19.87.5§8.7‡16.1
        LPN20.16.4§0.0§18.6
        Medical/nursing assistant23.215.6§17.925.6
        Other1.95.6§5.3†3.0
    Physician was patient’s regular primary care physician59.213.1§7.9§84.8§
    Primary expected source of payment for the visit
        Private insurance16.310.3§0.7§58.3§
        Medicare2.02.00.017.3§
        Medicaid3.00.3§0.0†9.3§
        Self-pay2.41.0†0.3‡7.0‡
        Workers’ compensation73.383.4‡93.8§0.0§
        No charge0.70.10.00.3
        Other1.12.15.3§5.3§
        Unknown0.50.50.01.8
    Care was provided in an HMO setting15.910.2‡10.731.0§
    Capitated payment basis for the visit7.24.26.216.9‡
    Patient was a new patient19.722.126.58.0§
    Patient was referred by another physician/health plan9.631.5§21.1†3.3‡
    Authorization from insurer was required for care19.640.4§47.0§3.2§
    Time spent with physician, mean, min16.119.4§22.0§16.3
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Weighted Percentage Distributions of Medications Prescribed or Administered During Office Visits, by Category, NAMCS Data, 1997–2000

    Visit Type
    Medications CategoryFP-WR*OP-WROccMed-WRFP-NWR
    NAMCS = National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; FP-WR = visit to family practice physician for work-related condition; OP-WR = visit to non–family practice physician for work-related condition; OccMed-WR = visits to occupational medicine physician for work-related condition; FP-NWR = visit to family practice physician for non–work-related condition.
    * Reference category for comparison.
    † P <.05
    ‡ P <.01
    § P <.001
    Anesthetics2.01.41.50.6‡
    Antimicrobials4.33.51.113.2§
    Hematologic agents0.30.50.01.6†
    Cardiovascular-renal drugs6.43.4†0.0‡16.2§
    Central nervous system drugs8.412.5‡2.3‡8.1
    Contrast media/radiopharmaceuticals0.00.10.00.3
    Gastrointestinal agents1.11.10.04.5§
    Metabolic agents/nutrients0.90.80.35.8§
    Hormones/hormonal mechanisms4.84.41.710.4§
    Immunologics1.51.35.2†3.5†
    Skin/mucous membrane agents5.05.29.14.3
    Neurologic drugs11.410.612.02.1§
    Oncolytics0.00.20.00.1
    Ophthalmics0.42.4†4.0‡0.7
    Otologics0.20.20.00.9
    Analgesics48.647.160.8‡11.8§
    Antiparasitics0.00.30.00.3
    Respiratory tract agents2.63.51.812.9§
    Unclassified/miscellaneous1.91.20.32.7
    Homeopathic products0.30.10.00.1
    Total100.0100.0100.0100.0
    Total no. prescribed/ordered3171,34712217,883
    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Medical Care Characteristics by Selected Visit Characteristics, Percentage of Office Visits to Family Physicians for Treatment of Work-Related Conditions (N = 326 Visits), NAMCS Data, 1997–2000

    Visit Characteristic*
    Was Paid For by Workers’ CompensationPhysician Was Patient’s Regular Primary PhysicianPatient Was a New Patient
    Medical Care CharacteristicYes (n = 241)No (n = 85)Yes (n = 213)No (n = 113)Yes (n = 59)No (n = 267)
    NAMCS = National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; ICD-9 = International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision; FP-WR = visit to family physician for work-related condition; OP-WR = visit to non–family physician for work-related condition; OccMed-WR = visit to occupational physician for work-related condition; FP-NWR = visit to family physician for non–work-related condition; RN = registered nurse; LPN = licensed practical nurse; HMO = health maintenance organization.
    * Comparisons were between No column and corresponding Yes column.
    † P <.05
    ‡ P <.01
    § P <.001
    Major reason for visit
        Acute problem56.053.449.563.8†64.854.0
        Chronic problem, routine18.113.721.410.4‡6.019.0†
        Chronic problem, flare-up10.610.114.44.8§5.111.8
        Presurgery or postsurgery/injury follow-up9.220.3†9.616.013.811.8
        Non-illness (eg, routine prenatal, general examination, well-baby)3.92.52.55.010.31.9‡
    Patient’s chief complaints and symptom
        Musculoskeletal symptoms48.341.745.947.433.249.8
        Injury or poisoning29.027.427.230.540.625.6
    Physician’s diagnosis of patient’s condition (ICD-9 groupings)
        Infectious and parasitic diseases0.00.40.00.30.00.2
        Neoplasm0.00.00.00.00.00.0
        Endocrine, nutritional, metabolic, and immune disorders0.00.00.00.00.00.0
        Mental disorders1.01.21.70.2§0.41.2§
        Diseases of nervous system, sense organs5.55.35.25.96.65.2
        Diseases of circulatory system2.00.00.92.44.90.6†
        Diseases of respiratory system1.62.12.90.00.02.1
        Diseases of digestive system0.90.01.00.00.00.8
        Diseases of genitourinary system0.01.70.80.00.00.6
        Diseases of skin, subcutaneous tissue, hair, nails0.72.51.40.94.30.4§
        Diseases of musculoskeletal system, connective tissue26.821.128.620.516.327.5
        Symptoms, signs, and ill-defined conditions1.91.62.31.20.02.3
        Injury and poisoning53.755.150.659.153.054.3
        Supplementary classification and other diagnoses5.86.83.69.614.54.0‡
    Visit was related to a specific injury or poisoning92.0100.0†93.595.089.795.2
        Visit was related to a self-inflicted injury or poisoning0.00.00.00.00.00.0
        Patient’s condition resulted from an assault0.00.02.32.42.12.4
    Services provided during visit
        Diagnostic and screening services69.878.672.172.374.371.6
        Blood pressure reading56.658.859.154.452.958.2
        Radiograph17.027.219.520.628.317.9
        Therapeutic and preventive services43.752.149.940.2†36.448.3
        Exercise counseling and education13.718.014.814.911.515.7
        Injury prevention counseling and education15.614.917.612.19.116.9
        Mental health counseling and education0.32.11.30.00.01.0
        Surgical procedures3.47.44.84.02.45.0
    Therapy provided during visit
        Physiotherapy18.422.822.914.912.721.3
        Psychotherapy0.00.00.00.00.00.0
        Psychopharmacotherapy0.30.00.40.00.00.3
    At least 1 drug was prescribed during the visit63.370.465.964.251.968.5
    Medical professionals seen during the visit
        Physician95.997.397.794.292.197.3
        Physician assistant0.52.51.50.30.61.1
        Nurse-practitioner2.90.01.43.26.51.0
        Nurse-midwife0.00.00.00.00.00.0
        RN21.515.317.523.318.620.1
        LPN19.122.820.120.018.720.4
        Medical/nursing assistant23.123.624.321.623.923.0
        Other2.11.31.92.04.91.2‡
    Physician was patient’s regular primary care physician52.777.1§100.00.018.069.4§
    Primary expected source of payment for the visit
        Private insurance0.061.023.95.2§4.919.1§
        Medicare0.07.53.40.0†0.02.5
        Medicaid0.011.24.01.51.43.4
        Self-pay0.09.11.24.24.61.9
        Workers’ compensation100.00.065.285.0§89.169.4§
        No charge0.02.50.01.60.00.8
        Other0.04.11.80.00.01.4
        Unknown0.01.90.01.30.017.9§
    Care was provided in an HMO setting10.231.5§23.35.1§7.77.7
    Capitated payment basis for the visit4.913.7§8.45.55.40.0§
    Patient was a new patient24.08.0‡6.039.7§100.00.0
    Patient was referred by another physician/health plan11.15.54.417.1§21.96.6‡
    Authorization from insurer was required for care24.85.5§16.024.0†28.917.4
    Time spent with physician, mean, min16.115.916.814.913.616.7

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Background Many family physicians provide care for patients with occupational illnesses and injuries, but little is known about the services they provide or how they compare with services provided by other types of physicians. This study aims to learn more about the care family physicians provide for patients with work-related disorders.

    What This Study Found Family physicians account for approximately 3 times as many visits each year for injured workers when compared with occupational medicine specialists. Patients receive more comprehensive care when they see their family physician for occupational injuries. During these visits, patients are more likely to have their blood pressure taken, receive diagnostic and screening services, and have prescription drugs prescribed or administered, compared with patients seeing other types of physicians.

    Implications

    • Family physicians often use visits for work-related conditions as opportunities to assess the patient��s overall health and provide other needed care.
    • A family medicine approach offers added value to occupational illness care.
    • These findings may be useful for establishing benchmarks to help family physicians assess the extent and type of services currently provided for work-related conditions.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 4 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 4 (2)
Vol. 4, Issue 2
1 Mar 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Services Provided by Family Physicians for Patients With Occupational Injuries and Illnesses
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Services Provided by Family Physicians for Patients With Occupational Injuries and Illnesses
Jong Uk Won, Allard E. Dembe
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2006, 4 (2) 138-147; DOI: 10.1370/afm.515

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Services Provided by Family Physicians for Patients With Occupational Injuries and Illnesses
Jong Uk Won, Allard E. Dembe
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2006, 4 (2) 138-147; DOI: 10.1370/afm.515
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Agile Implementation of a Digital Cognitive Assessment for Dementia in Primary Care
  • Authorship Inequity in Global Health Research Conducted in Low- and Middle-Income Countries and Published in High-Income Country Family Medicine Journals
  • Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing a Digital Cognitive Assessment for Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias in Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health services
    • Professional practice

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine