Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleAnnals Journal Club

Annals Journal Club: A RADICAL Approach

The Annals of Family Medicine May 2006, 4 (3) iii;
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The Annals of Family Medicine encourages readers to develop a learning community of those seeking to improve health care and health through enhanced primary care. You can participate by conducting a RADICAL journal club, and sharing your insights in the Annals online discussion. RADICAL is an acronym for: Read, Ask, Discuss, Inquire, Collaborate, Act and Learn. The word radical also indicates the need to engage diverse participants in thinking critically about important issues affecting primary care, and then acting on those discussions.1

HOW IT WORKS

In each issue, the Annals selects an article or articles and provides discussion tips and questions. We encourage you to take a RADICAL approach to these materials, and to post a summary of your conversation in our online discussion. (Open the article online and click on “TRACK Comments: Submit a response.”) You can find discussion questions and more information online at: http://www.annfammed.org/misc/AJC.shtml.

CURRENT SELECTIONS

Articles for Discussion

Frich JC, Ose L, Malterud K, Fugelli P. Perceived vulnerability to heart disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: a qualitative interview study. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4:198–204.OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

Goldman RE, Parker D, Eaton C, et al. Patients’ perceptions of cholesterol, cardiovascular disease risk, and risk communication strategies. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4:205–212.OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

Discussion Tips

Both journal club articles in this issue are qualitative research studies addressing patient risk perception and personalized medicine. Qualitative research involves methods that are particularly strong for discerning meaning and context from the perspective of the study group. Weaknesses of qualitative methods often relate to the degree of transparency of the analysis, the sampling of participants, and the transportability of the findings to other settings.2

Discussion Questions

  • Why is an understanding of patients’ risk perception important?

  • What are the strengths and weaknesses of the focus group study design (Goldman) vs the use of depth interviews? (Frich) How might the findings be different if the study questions were asked by surveys? What biases are apparent in the way the data were collected?

  • How transparent does the analysis appear for both studies? Would the results be as trustworthy if the analyses were conducted by an individual rather than a team?

  • How does the way the participants were selected affect your interpretation of the findings?

  • In qualitative research, the term “saturation” is used to indicate that a sufficient sample has been achieved such that new participants contribute relatively little new information. Do these studies’ claims of having reached saturation convince you that the important domains of information have been uncovered?

  • What are the main findings of each study? How do the two studies inform each other?

  • How transportable are the findings to other settings (particularly to yours)?

  • What are the studies’ implications for how clinicians should talk (or listen) to patients regarding risk and risk perception?

  • With the much-vaunted advent of “personalized medicine”3,4 based on genetic information, how will patients and clinicians reach a shared understanding of familial risk and personal vulnerability to heritable illness? How can the studies’ findings help clinicians and patients communicate about inherited disease risk?

  • What do these studies say about the whole idea of (genomically) “personalized medicine” and how it might or might not be feasible and ethical in practice?

  • What are the implications for training clinicians and educating patients?

  • What are the policy implications of these findings, eg for reimbursement for primary care visits?

To explore the HeartAge calculator, visit http://www.heartage.com.

  • © 2006 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Stange KC, Miller WL, McLellan LA, et al. Annals journal club: it’s time to get RADICAL. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4:196–197.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Crabtree BF, Miller WL, eds. Doing Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1999.
  3. ↵
    Snyderman R, Langheier J. Prospective health care: the second transformation of medicine. Genome Biol. 2006;7:104. Epub 2006 Feb 27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Langreth R, Waldholz M. New era of personalized medicine: targeting drugs for each unique genetic profile. Oncologist. 1999;4:426–427.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 4 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 4 (3)
Vol. 4, Issue 3
1 May 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Annals Journal Club: A RADICAL Approach
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 17 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Annals Journal Club: A RADICAL Approach
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2006, 4 (3) iii;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Annals Journal Club: A RADICAL Approach
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2006, 4 (3) iii;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • HOW IT WORKS
    • CURRENT SELECTIONS
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • On TRACK: The Search for the Holy Grail
  • In This Issue: Prescribing Drugs: What Do Patients and Pharmaceutical Companies Really Want?
  • In This Issue: Communication in the Era of 'Personalized' Medicine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Self-Rooming Patients in Health System?
  • Continuity of Care as a Quality Metric
  • Evaluation of Community Health Worker Intervention in San Antonio
Show more ANNALS JOURNAL CLUB

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine