Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
NewsFamily Medicine UpdatesF

INTELLIGENT DESIGN OR EVOLUTION? INNOVATION IN FAMILY MEDICINE RESIDENCIES

Michael K. Magill
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2007, 5 (1) 88-89; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.671
Michael K. Magill
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Family Medicine Residency programs must innovate rapidly to attract applicants, compete for patients, deliver quality, and ensure that all graduates can deliver New Model care. However, powerful forces inhibit innovation precisely at a time when it should accelerate. This is the “innovator’s dilemma”: investment in an existing product makes fundamental change very difficult.1

From a national perspective, we must choose between alternative paths as we seek to recreate residency training: prescriptive, incremental change with predetermined outcomes vs unplanned, disorganized experiments with both failures and successes. In other words, we must choose between “intelligent design” and “evolution.”

The choice is not simply between these 2 extremes; there are many points on the spectrum. However, ADFM believes we should move much farther toward “evolution” than we have to date. Failure risks extinction of the discipline of family medicine.

INTELLIGENT DESIGN

Careful, planned, incremental change in residencies is commendable. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and its Residency Review Committees (RRCs), including the RRC-FM, exist “to improve health care by assessing and advancing the quality of resident physicians’ education through accreditation.”2 Unstated is the premise that accreditation is intended to protect the public by enforcing minimum standards for residency programs. The RRC requirements are the organizational equivalent of DNA, the “genetic code” describing minimal structure and function for life of residencies. Accreditation follows change; it does not lead it.

The “family” of family medicine has taken important steps toward planned, incremental change in practice and training. The New Model of family medicine was developed after extensive research and widespread input; TransforMED is helping 36 family practices implement the New Model.3 Keying off TransforMED, the ABFM, AFMRD, and AAFP have launched the Preparing the Personal Physician for Practice (P4) project to help residencies innovate.4 The P4 “experiments” will begin in 2007 and are expected to continue for 3 years, with evaluation of the changes in training a key part of the process.

The RRC-FM has new membership and a new executive director. We are hopeful they will be more supportive of experiments than the RRC-FM has been in the past, and that P4 will facilitate significant innovation. However, P4 will only work with a few programs, and it is not clear yet to what degree the RRC-FM will allow P4 residencies to deviate from requirements.

The process will also be slow. New RRC requirements, potentially incorporating results of “successful” P4 experiments, will not emerge for years. They represent one of our discipline’s last chances to adapt to changes in medical practice for years. If this is our strategy, we better be right! Unfortunately, however, this is like assuming for ourselves the role of an omniscient “designer” to precisely anticipate future environmental pressures and implant the mutations in our “residency DNA” to ensure survival of our species.

EVOLUTION

The alternative model is evolution, which occurs when there is sufficient genetic diversity in a population that some individuals have an adaptive advantage in the face of environmental change or competitive pressure. But diversity comes at a price: more mutations mean potential for failures.

We believe this model better describes the way family medicine should encourage innovation in our residencies. The practice of family medicine is already evolving rapidly. Family physicians are serving in a plethora of communities and environments, from large to small practices, corporate to independent work, New Model to retail clinics, hospitalist practice to low overhead practices to home visiting out of the trunks of cars.

There is no longer a single definition of family medicine. Family medicine is what people who call themselves family physicians do. Stated differently, in the high pressure ecology of practice, our species is already responding to “natural selection” forces in different markets. Family physicians are even acquiring “hybrid vigor” as they pursue Masters’ degrees, fellowship training, CAQs, and dual certification. Demand is high for residencies that encourage such vigor via special foci and extended training.5

Of course, the dichotomy of “intelligent design” and “evolution” is not absolute. Residents must acquire a core set of knowledge, skills, and attitudes to become family physicians. However, ADFM believes that we should not limit innovations to carefully controlled “experiments” in a few residencies around the margins of dangerously restrictive requirements. We should instead encourage residencies to find the most successful practicing family physicians in their communities, study what they do, and prepare residents to practice and adapt like these exemplary doctors. Then we should get out of the way and see what evolves.

  • © 2007 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Magill, M. Compelled to fail? The innovator’s dilemma and family medicine residency programs. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(4):375–376.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Mission Statement. 2006. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/about/ab_mission.asp. Accessed: 28 October 2006.
  3. ↵
    TransforMED. TransforMED homepage. 2006. Available at: http://www.transformed.com/. Accessed: 28 October 2006.
  4. ↵
    P4: Preparing the Personal Physician for Practice. Available from: http://www.transformed.com/p4.cfm. 2006. Accessed: 28 October 2006.
  5. ↵
    Lebensohn P, Campos-Outcalt D, Senf J, Pugno PA. Experience with an optional four-year residency: the University of Arizona Family Medicine Residency. Fam Med. In press.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 5 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 5 (1)
Vol. 5, Issue 1
1 Jan 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
INTELLIGENT DESIGN OR EVOLUTION? INNOVATION IN FAMILY MEDICINE RESIDENCIES
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
INTELLIGENT DESIGN OR EVOLUTION? INNOVATION IN FAMILY MEDICINE RESIDENCIES
Michael K. Magill
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2007, 5 (1) 88-89; DOI: 10.1370/afm.671

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
INTELLIGENT DESIGN OR EVOLUTION? INNOVATION IN FAMILY MEDICINE RESIDENCIES
Michael K. Magill
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2007, 5 (1) 88-89; DOI: 10.1370/afm.671
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • INTELLIGENT DESIGN
    • EVOLUTION
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • On TRACK: Intended and Unintended Consequences of Direct-to-Consumer Drug Marketing
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Core Outcomes of Residency Training 2022 (Provisional)
  • AAFP Issues New Clinical Practice Guideline on Hypertension
  • Family Medicine Advances Transition to Competency-Based Education
Show more Family Medicine Updates

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine