Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
OtherReflectionsA

The Teamlet Model of Primary Care

Thomas Bodenheimer and Brian Yoshio Laing
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2007, 5 (5) 457-461; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.731
Thomas Bodenheimer
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Yoshio Laing
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Teamlets are fact, not theory
    Michael K. Magill
    Published on: 05 November 2007
  • A Health Coach�s Lens on Eliciting Change Talk in Primary Care
    Judith Doherty
    Published on: 12 October 2007
  • Good idea... but will it work today?
    David V Garrett
    Published on: 30 September 2007
  • role of health coach
    Melinda H. Huffman
    Published on: 26 September 2007
  • Published on: (5 November 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for Teamlets are fact, not theory
    Teamlets are fact, not theory
    • Michael K. Magill, Salt Lake City, Utah

    The teamlet model Bodenheimer describes already exists and is rapidly evolving in multiple family medicine practices of many types across the nation: small private practices, large groups, Community Health Centers, and academic. It is being driven by the palpable change in efficiency, quality, and satisfaction for patients, staff and providers who experience it.

    We have developed a similar model in the Universit...

    Show More

    The teamlet model Bodenheimer describes already exists and is rapidly evolving in multiple family medicine practices of many types across the nation: small private practices, large groups, Community Health Centers, and academic. It is being driven by the palpable change in efficiency, quality, and satisfaction for patients, staff and providers who experience it.

    We have developed a similar model in the University of Utah Community Clinics, an 11-site, 100-provider multidisciplinary practice network caring for over 125,000 active patients. We have tested the model in our smaller practices and are now implementing it over time in all our sites. Along the way, we have learned some lessons that add to Bodenheimer’s excellent description of the model:

    • It is useful to think of the role of the health coach (in our case, a medical assistant (MA) with advanced training) as delivering the visit to the patient. An MA greets a patient on arrival (no receptionist, no waiting), verifies identifying and insurance information, and takes the patient to an examination room where the MA immediately begins the clinical visit (a similar model is described in Gordon P, Chin M. Achieving a New Standard in Primary Care for Low-Income Populations: Case Study 1: Redesigning the Patient Visit, The Commonwealth Fund, August 2004, http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/publications_show.htm?doc_id=235281#areaCitation, accessed November 3, 2007). Delivering the visit to the patient in the room and never abandoning the patient dramatically reduces patient cycle time in the office (Endsley S, Magill MK, Godfrey MM. Creating a Lean Practice. Fam Pract Mgmt April 2006: 34-8).

    • Advanced training for MAs can go farther than we might have imagined. In our case, MAs register patients, scribe histories and physical examinations using an extensive library of computer-based templates, draw blood, take xrays under a limited radiology technician license, explain computerized after visit summaries.to patients, schedule follow-up appointments, and maintain contact with patients such as those due for chronic disease management or health maintenance. This is consistent with the pattern of “up-migration” of disciplines over time described by Christensen. (Christensen CM, Bohmer R, Kenagy J. Will disruptive innovations save health care? Harvard Business Review Sep-Oct 2000: 20-8.)

    • With an adequate supply of MAs, the practice maintains the same staff to physician ratio and overhead as do traditional model practices, with MAs replacing staff who had served other, more limited roles. Ideally, the teamlet-based practice has 5 MAs to 2 physicians, eliminating need for receptionists, phlebotomists, and medical records personnel. In our setting, this is further supported by an off-site call center and robust electronic health record (EHR). It’s amazing how helpful it is for the telephone not to ring while the teamlet cares for patients. Response time to patient calls for clinical issues is actually reduced, as messages flow efficiently through the EHR messaging function.

    • With an adequate ratio of MAs to providers, physician time with patients flows smoothly. The physician is no longer the bottleneck for the practice. But neither is the MA. When a relatively complicated, talkative, or distressed patient arrives, a single MA can devote as much time to the patient as needed, while the other MAs and providers maintain flow of patients through the practice. When the more complex patient is prepared to see the provider, the actual provider time required is not much different from that for other patients. One of our physicians describes this as analogous to a railroad siding. The MA and the patient needing extra time spend as much time as needed on the siding, while the main line traffic continues to flow. Once ready, the patient from the siding re-enters the mainline without interruption.

    • Training and retention of health coaches is a rate limiting step for implementation of the teamlet. In our area, no training program provides MAs with all the skills. We have therefore developed our own training program. Small practices may be vulnerable to turnover of the health coaches: absence or loss of just one or two causes breakdown of the model. Large groups such as ours may offer flexible coverage, but at the price of more difficulty standardizing provider and MA roles across teams.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (12 October 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for A Health Coach�s Lens on Eliciting Change Talk in Primary Care
    A Health Coach�s Lens on Eliciting Change Talk in Primary Care
    • Judith Doherty, West Boylston, MA, USA

    In clinical practice it seems a delicate balance must be struck between short-changing patients by cutting off their stories, and having appointments become unwieldy. The dilemma seems to be how to respond to material that patients bring to the clinic, and at the same time, nudge them in the direction of healthier living. I am impressed by Dr. Thomas Bodenheimer’s essay “The Teamlet Model of Primary Care” Annals of Family M...

    Show More

    In clinical practice it seems a delicate balance must be struck between short-changing patients by cutting off their stories, and having appointments become unwieldy. The dilemma seems to be how to respond to material that patients bring to the clinic, and at the same time, nudge them in the direction of healthier living. I am impressed by Dr. Thomas Bodenheimer’s essay “The Teamlet Model of Primary Care” Annals of Family Medicine (2007) in that the previsit/postvisit structure adds focus to the work of a health coach and assists the physician in meeting patients’ needs. When a health coach meets prior to the physician visit, the patient can feel heard and can focus on agenda setting. Likewise, the health coach can direct the patient in particular ways to insure that time with the doc answers important questions. The post visit talk can support and recap important elements from the physician encounter.

    Having worked with over 100 patients in the role of health coach, I’ve determined that “vital conversations” can occur, when a coach emphasizes the following in the previsit:

    • Focus on where the life-blood, energy and packed emotions emerge.
    • Balance of questions that are non-threatening, fairly open-ended and reflect back to the speaker that what has been said was heard.
    • Try to pinpoint, what seems most urgent or important in what he is saying.

    Limiting Unproductive Talk by steering patients back to their own core issues is not only time efficient; it also helps them to center on what is most important. Due to nervousness, patients can wander in medical conversations wondering which aspects are significant to share. The health coach can gently guide by looping back to synthesize and pulling a thread of conversation through that seems central.

    In Dr. Bodenheimer’s “teamlet model” the health coach would often participate in the physician visit. In my view patients should be explicitly asked whether they prefer only to have the health coach pre and post, but not in the examination room.

    Combining the Bodenheimer and Laing “teamlet model of primary care” with attention to the how of conversations with health coaches could offer more satisfying patient, health coach and physician encounters seems a valuable direction in health care.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (30 September 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for Good idea... but will it work today?
    Good idea... but will it work today?
    • David V Garrett, Leawood, US

    I feel the article does a great job of identifying the growing complexity of today’s primary care office visit, in addition stating that the traditional approach of 15 minute ambulatory visits no longer satisfy the needs of the patient or provider team. Such visits may be fine for acute care or basic medication management, but tend to be inadequate for those with a chronic issue(s) or multiple conditions.

    The...

    Show More

    I feel the article does a great job of identifying the growing complexity of today’s primary care office visit, in addition stating that the traditional approach of 15 minute ambulatory visits no longer satisfy the needs of the patient or provider team. Such visits may be fine for acute care or basic medication management, but tend to be inadequate for those with a chronic issue(s) or multiple conditions.

    The “teamlet” approach as outlined in your article is intriguing in that it accomplishes some critical things. It more appropriately assigns important parts of the visit such as information intake, medication reconciliation, standing orders for diagnostic management, and patient coaching, to non-physician staff. With these things done and documented, the physicians can concentrate on further high level assessment, asking clarifying questions and building a relationship with each patient.

    Just as important, the post-visit is critical and something that is not being done in today’s office exams. The entire visit is of minimal use if the patient doesn’t understand why they were treated, what was done, and how they should incorporate changes into their daily life. If there were 2 coaches per provider to keep the provider moving, and another team member (possibly RN) working on patient triage and follow-up from the previous day(s), I think such a model could work.

    The article does well to point out that changes to the current model will be short lived as this approach is unsustainable in the current reimbursement system outside of academic centers. I would enjoy seeing multi-year studies to prove the long term cost effectiveness of such a model. I think it would also produce better patient outcomes, happier physicians and staff.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (26 September 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for role of health coach
    role of health coach
    • Melinda H. Huffman, Winchester, TN

    I applaud Bodenheimer and Laing for introducing the teamlet approach as a way to enhance the efficiency of family practice and the patient experience. I recommend that greater consideration be given to the role of health coach as one who guides the patient through self-discovery of amibvalence to health behavior change; a key component of successful chronic condition management. An action plan may yield better outcomes w...

    Show More

    I applaud Bodenheimer and Laing for introducing the teamlet approach as a way to enhance the efficiency of family practice and the patient experience. I recommend that greater consideration be given to the role of health coach as one who guides the patient through self-discovery of amibvalence to health behavior change; a key component of successful chronic condition management. An action plan may yield better outcomes when coupled with health coaching strategies to assist patients in changing health behaviors.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 5 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 5 (5)
Vol. 5, Issue 5
1 Sep 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Teamlet Model of Primary Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Teamlet Model of Primary Care
Thomas Bodenheimer, Brian Yoshio Laing
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2007, 5 (5) 457-461; DOI: 10.1370/afm.731

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
The Teamlet Model of Primary Care
Thomas Bodenheimer, Brian Yoshio Laing
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2007, 5 (5) 457-461; DOI: 10.1370/afm.731
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • WHAT IS A TEAMLET?
    • THE TEAMLET MODEL
    • POTENTIAL CHALLENGES
    • TRAINING HEALTH COACHES
    • FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY OF THE MODEL
    • IMPLEMENTING PARTS OF THE MODEL
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Primary Care Practice Characteristics Associated With Medical Assistant Staffing Ratios
  • High-Performing Teamlets in Primary Care: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis
  • Primary care micro-teams: an international systematic review of patient and healthcare professional perspectives
  • Impact of primary care usual provider type and provider interdependence on outcomes for patients with diabetes: a cohort study
  • Delivering High-Quality Primary Care Requires Work That Is Worthwhile for Medical Assistants
  • Primary care micro-teams: a protocol for an international systematic review to describe and examine the opportunities and challenges of implementation for patients and healthcare professionals
  • Associations of primary care structures with polypharmacy and patient-reported indicators in patients with complex multimorbidity: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan
  • Financial Incentives for Medical Assistants: A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Bonus Structures, Motivation, and Population Health Quality Measures
  • Care Practices to Promote Patient Engagement in VA Primary Care: Factors Associated With High Performance
  • Team Configurations, Efficiency, and Family Physician Burnout
  • Roles and Functions of Community Health Workers in Primary Care
  • 'The Hand on the Doorknob: Visit Agenda Setting by Complex Patients and Their Primary Care Physicians
  • Family Medicine Panel Size with Care Teams: Impact on Quality
  • Team-Based Care Offers a New World of Value
  • Teamlets in Primary Care: Enhancing the Patient and Clinician Experience
  • Health Coaching by Medical Assistants to Improve Control of Diabetes, Hypertension, and Hyperlipidemia in Low-Income Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Patient-Centered Medical Home Initiative Produced Modest Economic Results For Veterans Health Administration, 2010-12
  • Real-World Implementation and Outcomes of Health Behavior and Mental Health Assessment
  • Team Structure and Culture Are Associated With Lower Burnout in Primary Care
  • Association of Patient Recall, Satisfaction, and Adherence to Content of an Electronic Health Record (EHR)-Generated After Visit Summary: A Randomized Clinical Trial
  • Patterns of Relating Between Physicians and Medical Assistants in Small Family Medicine Offices
  • Cost-effectiveness of depression case management in small practices
  • In Search of Joy in Practice: A Report of 23 High-Functioning Primary Care Practices
  • Care for Patients with Chronic Nonmalignant Pain with and without Chronic Opioid Prescriptions: A Report from the Cincinnati Area Research Group (CARinG) Network
  • Evaluating a Culturally and Linguistically Competent Health Coach Intervention for Chinese-American Patients With Diabetes
  • The FEeding Support Team (FEST) randomised, controlled feasibility trial of proactive and reactive telephone support for breastfeeding women living in disadvantaged areas
  • Information Chaos in Primary Care: Implications for Physician Performance and Patient Safety
  • Coordination of Health Behavior Counseling in Primary Care
  • The Rural Older Adult Memory (ROAM) Study: A Practice-based Intervention to Improve Dementia Screening and Diagnosis
  • Primary Care: Current Problems And Proposed Solutions
  • Summary of the National Demonstration Project and Recommendations for the Patient-Centered Medical Home
  • A Medical Assistant-Based Program to Promote Healthy Behaviors in Primary Care
  • The Medical Home: Growing Evidence to Support a New Approach to Primary Care
  • Hypotheses and Questions
  • Annals Journal Club: Novel Staffing for Improved Patient Disease Management
  • In This Issue: Risk and Care Management
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • When the Death of a Colleague Meets Academic Publishing: A Call for Compassion
  • Let’s Dare to Be Vulnerable: Crossing the Self-Disclosure Rubicon
  • Not Like They Used To: The Decline of Procedural Competency in Medical Training
Show more Reflections

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Other topics:
    • Quality improvement
    • Organizational / practice change
    • Patient-centered medical home

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine