Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Pursuing Equity: Contact With Primary Care and Specialist Clinicians by Demographics, Insurance, and Health Status

Robert L. Ferrer
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2007, 5 (6) 492-502; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.746
Robert L. Ferrer
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Re: Disadvantaged populations are also complex
    Robert L. Ferrer
    Published on: 15 December 2007
  • Disadvantaged populations are also complex
    Elizabeth A. Bayliss
    Published on: 29 November 2007
  • Primary Care & the Pursuit of Health Equity
    George S. Rust
    Published on: 28 November 2007
  • Published on: (15 December 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for Re: Disadvantaged populations are also complex
    Re: Disadvantaged populations are also complex
    • Robert L. Ferrer, San Antonio, TX, United States

    George Rust and Elizabeth Bayliss make important comments about the multivariate nature of social disadvantage.

    George Rust reminds us of a sometimes overlooked truth, that racial and ethnic disparities in both health and health care are often driven by factors other than race and ethnicity, and that many of those factors are amenable to policy interventions.

    Elizabeth Bayliss makes a related argum...

    Show More

    George Rust and Elizabeth Bayliss make important comments about the multivariate nature of social disadvantage.

    George Rust reminds us of a sometimes overlooked truth, that racial and ethnic disparities in both health and health care are often driven by factors other than race and ethnicity, and that many of those factors are amenable to policy interventions.

    Elizabeth Bayliss makes a related argument, with which I also agree, that it is important to acccount for and understand the interdependence of risk factors for poor access to health care. In this regard, Figures 3 and 4 [in the paper] presented multivariate results that simultaneously adjust for the other markers of potential disadvantage. I have also performed several of the stratified analyses she recommends, finding that the results reported in the paper seem robust when stratified by geographic category or insurance status. In explanation, I would offer that although disadvantage is complex, family physicians' practice characteristics mitigate many of the paths to poor access: they charge less than specialists, they work where the population lives, and they make up a significant fraction of community health center staff. So, one could argue that workforce reform is perhaps more necessary, not less, in the absence of reform for universal access. Nevertheless, it seems very likely, as Dr. Bayliss suggests, that enactment of universal access would outweigh any access improvement created through workforce interventions.

    Whether or not increasing the supply of family physcians (or nurse practitioners) would reduce disparities is an open question; to the extent that the added workforce replicated the patterns of the old, it is plausible. In the paper however, I was making the opposite argument, that further declines in the primary care workforce are likely to erode access for disadvantaged Americans. To me at least, this is less controversial. Who else will step in?

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (29 November 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for Disadvantaged populations are also complex
    Disadvantaged populations are also complex
    • Elizabeth A. Bayliss, Denver, CO, USA

    After an analysis of demographic factors associated with access to different medical specialties, Dr. Ferrer concludes that primary care clinicians provide a disproportionate share of ambulatory care to disadvantaged populations and to those with chronic conditions (though it appears that this applies primarily to FPs and mid-levels, not pediatricians and general internists). Therefore from a policy perspective, primary...

    Show More

    After an analysis of demographic factors associated with access to different medical specialties, Dr. Ferrer concludes that primary care clinicians provide a disproportionate share of ambulatory care to disadvantaged populations and to those with chronic conditions (though it appears that this applies primarily to FPs and mid-levels, not pediatricians and general internists). Therefore from a policy perspective, primary care in general, and family medicine in particular, is essential to the continued care of all demographic groups.

    We have to be a little careful not to leap to the assumption that just because FPs provide more care to disadvantaged populations than do the other provider groups examined, that subsequent policies to increase numbers of FPs could reduce health disparities by increasing visit access for these at-risk populations. This approach assumes that a major problem behind health disparities is that disadvantaged populations are getting insufficient access to care due to insufficient numbers of primary care clinicians. But disadvantaged populations are complex and are ‘disadvantaged’ for multiple reasons. For example, in this analysis the really low odds of access to all providers were for uninsured patients; thus encouraging me to leap to another assumption that it may be ineffective to advocate for improvements in health disparities via changes in the primary care workforce in the absence of substantial health- insurance insurance reform.

    In order to explore these issues, I am curious about possible interactions between the independent variables that describe demographic characteristics. Although looking at interactions runs the risk of creating a complicated picture, that is precisely the point—many of these characteristics that describe ‘disadvantaged’ populations are likely to be associated with each other as well as with the ‘outcome’ of provider type. For example, what does relative access to these providers look like if the data are stratified by MSA/non-MSA, or by insured/uninsured? Will that further inform policy decisions on the overall role for primary care? Or the need for broader insurance coverage? Or primary and specialty reimbursement from public insurance programs?

    This article is an intriguing contribution to characterizing ‘disadvantaged’ populations and determining their care needs. Studies such as this can serve as starting points to further explorations in which we combine population-level data with patient-level data to help us define more accurately the care needs of various complex patient populations.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (28 November 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for Primary Care & the Pursuit of Health Equity
    Primary Care & the Pursuit of Health Equity
    • George S. Rust, Atlanta, GA USA
    In his recent article (“Pursuing Equity”), Dr. Ferrer makes the very important point that primary care clinicians (especially family physicians) are a critical source of care for those who are disadvantaged. As such, primary care clinicians are an essential buffer that improves homeostasis in a fragmented and dysfunctional health care system by reducing extreme inequities. The converse is also compelling – our nation’s failure...
    Show More
    In his recent article (“Pursuing Equity”), Dr. Ferrer makes the very important point that primary care clinicians (especially family physicians) are a critical source of care for those who are disadvantaged. As such, primary care clinicians are an essential buffer that improves homeostasis in a fragmented and dysfunctional health care system by reducing extreme inequities. The converse is also compelling – our nation’s failure to support primary care as a national priority may exacerbate health care inequities and worsen health outcomes for our diverse U.S. population. One caution about this type of study -- there is a tendency to think of “poor, black, and uninsured” all in one breath, without recognizing the heterogeneity within each racial or ethnic group. Instead, it is important to make a distinction in this type of analysis between modifiable predictors of access and equity (poverty, uninsurance, residential segregation, access to affordable and culturally-relevant care, etc.), vs. risk factors (race, ethnicity, gender, etc.) that are not modifiable either by patients or by society. We published just such an analysis(1) of MEPS data in 2004, looking at advantaged vs. disadvantaged individuals (uninsured, poor, and no usual source of care) solely within the African-American population, to demonstrate the powerful impact of these modifiable risks on utilization even within a minority population characterized by a high level of adverse outcomes attributable to racial health disparities(2). We found up to six-fold variation in utilization of office visits and prescription medicines when comparing well-insured, middle & upper-income African American respondents vs. African Americans who were poor and uninsured, as well as dramatic differences in the ratio of ED visit rates to hospital admission rates. Bottom line? Racial disparities in patterns of health utilization are often closely related to factors we as a society could fix, if we so chose. From Dr. Ferrer’s analysis, we can add primary care access to the list, along with previously known factors such as uninsurance, individual and neighborhood poverty, residential segregation, and education(3). 1. Rust G, Fryer GE, Strothers H, Daniels E, McCann J, Satcher D. Modifiable Determinants of Health Care Utilization within the African-American population. J National Medical Assoc, Sept. 2004; 96(9):1169-1177. 2. Satcher D, Fryer GE, McCann J, Troutman A, Woolf S, Rust G. What If We Were Equal? A Comparison of the Black-White Mortality Gap in 1960 and 2000. Health Affairs, March 2005. 3. Williams DR, Jackson PB. Social sources of racial disparities in health. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Mar-Apr;24(2):325-34.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 5 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 5 (6)
Vol. 5, Issue 6
1 Nov 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
  • Annual Indexes
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pursuing Equity: Contact With Primary Care and Specialist Clinicians by Demographics, Insurance, and Health Status
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Pursuing Equity: Contact With Primary Care and Specialist Clinicians by Demographics, Insurance, and Health Status
Robert L. Ferrer
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2007, 5 (6) 492-502; DOI: 10.1370/afm.746

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Pursuing Equity: Contact With Primary Care and Specialist Clinicians by Demographics, Insurance, and Health Status
Robert L. Ferrer
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2007, 5 (6) 492-502; DOI: 10.1370/afm.746
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Not all healthcare inequities in diabetes are equal: a comparison of two medically underserved cohorts
  • Community Health Workers as Trust Builders and Healers: A Cohort Study in Primary Care
  • Primary Care Providers in California and Florida Report Low Confidence in Providing Type 1 Diabetes Care
  • Most Uninsured Adults Could Schedule Primary Care Appointments Before The ACA, But Average Price Was $160
  • Measuring Capability for Healthy Diet and Physical Activity
  • The strength of primary care systems
  • Electronic Health Records vs Medicaid Claims: Completeness of Diabetes Preventive Care Data in Community Health Centers
  • Racial Differences in Primary Care Opioid Risk Reduction Strategies
  • Health Care Reform and Equity: Promise, Pitfalls, and Prescriptions
  • Capability and Clinical Success
  • Context for Understanding the National Demonstration Project and the Patient-Centered Medical Home
  • Primary Care Provider Views of the Current Referral-to-Eye-Care Process: Focus Group Results
  • A Medical Assistant-Based Program to Promote Healthy Behaviors in Primary Care
  • The Paradox of Primary Care
  • Delivery of Survivorship Care by Primary Care Physicians: The Perspective of Breast Cancer Patients
  • No Job Is Finished Until the Electronic Work Is Done
  • In This Issue: Equity Global Theme Issue on Poverty and Human Development
  • Recruiting Primary Care Physicians From Abroad: Is Poaching From Low-Income Countries Morally Defensible?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Agile Implementation of a Digital Cognitive Assessment for Dementia in Primary Care
  • Authorship Inequity in Global Health Research Conducted in Low- and Middle-Income Countries and Published in High-Income Country Family Medicine Journals
  • Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing a Digital Cognitive Assessment for Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias in Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
  • Person groups:
    • Vulnerable populations
    • Community / population health
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • Health services
  • Other topics:
    • Disparities in health and health care

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine