Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleMethodology

Development and Internal Validation of the Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Score

Angela J. Shepherd, Alvah R. Cass, Carol A. Carlson and Laura Ray
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2007, 5 (6) 540-546; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.753
Angela J. Shepherd
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alvah R. Cass
MD, SM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carol A. Carlson
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Ray
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Response to Dr. Lafita and Dr. Garcia
    Alvah R Cass
    Published on: 11 December 2007
  • Re: Dr. Adler's comments
    Angela J Shepherd
    Published on: 11 December 2007
  • Re Celiac Disease and osteoporosis
    Angela J Shepherd
    Published on: 11 December 2007
  • Another Risk Factor?
    Alan G Cocks
    Published on: 02 December 2007
  • Author's response
    Angela J Shepherd
    Published on: 29 November 2007
  • Comparison of screening tools in men
    Robert A. Adler
    Published on: 28 November 2007
  • Screening Osteoporosis Risk
    Francisco R. Lafita MD, FACP
    Published on: 27 November 2007
  • Osteoporosis in men: a neglected issue
    Jean-Yves REGINSTER
    Published on: 26 November 2007
  • Published on: (11 December 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for Response to Dr. Lafita and Dr. Garcia
    Response to Dr. Lafita and Dr. Garcia
    • Alvah R Cass, Galveston, TX USA
    • Other Contributors:

    We welcome the insightful comments by Dr. Lafita and Dr. Garcia regarding our recent article, “Development and Internal Validation of the Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Score”. Their comments raise several points that make for stimulating discussion and debate. First, we certainly agree with their introductory comments that, “Simple and effective methods are needed to identify patients at risk for osteoporosis or oste...

    Show More

    We welcome the insightful comments by Dr. Lafita and Dr. Garcia regarding our recent article, “Development and Internal Validation of the Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Score”. Their comments raise several points that make for stimulating discussion and debate. First, we certainly agree with their introductory comments that, “Simple and effective methods are needed to identify patients at risk for osteoporosis or osteoporosis related fracture …”. One of our fundamental goals in developing the MORES was to create a straightforward tool that could easily and reliably be used in a clinical encounter, especially in a primary care setting, to identify men at increased risk of osteoporosis. We believe the MORES accomplishes this goal. Secondly, we also agree that various medical conditions other than COPD are important and may predispose to loss of bone mineral density. However, at what point do clinicians depart from primary screening of an ambulatory population, with the intent of identifying men at increased risk of osteoporosis, and move toward a diagnostic investigation to identify osteoporosis as a comorbid condition or complication of therapy? For example, we evaluated a self-reported history of rheumatoid arthritis and found a substantial amount of responses missing. Furthermore, the bivariate relationship between self-reported rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis was not statistically significant. A corollary to the primary screening versus diagnostic evaluation is that specialists, such as endocrinologists or rheumatologists, see a population biased by an enriched prevalence of specific diseases and referral patterns. Therefore they are naturally more mindful of conditions associated with loss of bone mineral density and development of osteoporosis. In a broader screening context, such as primary care practice, such conditions are much less frequent and may have little overall impact on clinical risk assessment; however, in an individual encounter with patients with these disorders, a clinician may elect to do a DEXA as a diagnostic study. Thirdly, we were limited by the data included in the NHANES dataset and chose to model variables found in other studies that were predictive of osteoporosis or osteoporosis related fractures that would be readily available in a clinical encounter. Finally, the clinical utility of biochemical markers of bone turnover and osteoporosis is not established and position statements from specialty societies differ.1, 2 The use of these markers in primary screening for osteoporosis would add substantially to the cost, but may not yield a reciprocal increase in identification of patients at risk for osteoporosis.

    References:

    1. Osteoporosis Task Force. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists: 2001 medical guidelines for clinical practice for the prevention & management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocrine Practice. July/August 2001 2001;7(4). 2. The North American Menopause Society. Management of postmenopausal osteoporosis: position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2002;9(2):84-101.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (11 December 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for Re: Dr. Adler's comments
    Re: Dr. Adler's comments
    • Angela J Shepherd, Galveston, TX
    • Other Contributors:

    Dr. Adler is correct regarding our comments regarding the OST. We did test it in the HNANES data (as part of our study) and by sensitivity and specificity and ROC it was essentially the same. (Using the same cutpoint that he reported in his study, the OST had sl less specificity than the MORES but not significant.) My difficulty with the OST was in my reading of the studies of its development I became confused as to what...

    Show More

    Dr. Adler is correct regarding our comments regarding the OST. We did test it in the HNANES data (as part of our study) and by sensitivity and specificity and ROC it was essentially the same. (Using the same cutpoint that he reported in his study, the OST had sl less specificity than the MORES but not significant.) My difficulty with the OST was in my reading of the studies of its development I became confused as to what the cut point should be and how the cut point is/should be derived. The other studies I read, Koh et al and Kung et al (see bib in paper) did not seem to use a standard cutpoint. I found the MORES easier to compute (and the cutpoint does not change), but both should help clinicians identify men at risk for osteoporosis.

    Angela J. Shepherd, MD UTMB Family Medicine

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (11 December 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for Re Celiac Disease and osteoporosis
    Re Celiac Disease and osteoporosis
    • Angela J Shepherd, Galveston, TX
    • Other Contributors:

    Comment was: is celiac disease a risk for osteoporosis. Yes, due to malabsorption. A Shepherd

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (2 December 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for Another Risk Factor?
    Another Risk Factor?
    • Alan G Cocks, Sydney Australia

    Does anyone know if Celiac (Coeliac) disease is a risk factor in Male Osteoporosis?

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (29 November 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for Author's response
    Author's response
    • Angela J Shepherd, Galveston, TX USA
    • Other Contributors:

    We appreciate the comments from Dr. Reginster from Belgium. In our ongoing literature research, we have been impressed that osteoporosis in men and women is a significant concern and research topic on a worldwide scale. Research teams in China, Japan, northern and southern Europe, the US and Canada are publishing studies on a regular basis. We hope that our study will stimulate more investigations so that we can further...

    Show More

    We appreciate the comments from Dr. Reginster from Belgium. In our ongoing literature research, we have been impressed that osteoporosis in men and women is a significant concern and research topic on a worldwide scale. Research teams in China, Japan, northern and southern Europe, the US and Canada are publishing studies on a regular basis. We hope that our study will stimulate more investigations so that we can further understand and identify risks in our patients and ultimately negatively impact the number of future osteoporosis cases and fractures.

    Angela Shepherd Alvah Cass Laura Ray Carol Carlson

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (28 November 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for Comparison of screening tools in men
    Comparison of screening tools in men
    • Robert A. Adler, Richmond, Virginia USA

    Shepherd et al present a potential screening tool for osteoporosis in men, based on age, weight, and COPD. Using NHANES data, the MORES score predicted hip bone density well and was validated using other NHANES data. The authors stated that the OST score, used in several populations of men was cumbersome to calculate and different cut-offs had been used in different populations. The authors base their work solely on the...

    Show More

    Shepherd et al present a potential screening tool for osteoporosis in men, based on age, weight, and COPD. Using NHANES data, the MORES score predicted hip bone density well and was validated using other NHANES data. The authors stated that the OST score, used in several populations of men was cumbersome to calculate and different cut-offs had been used in different populations. The authors base their work solely on the total hip bone density. For younger men, osteoporosis may first be seen in the spine, so the predictive value of MORES may be worse than it seems. In addition, the authors assume that there is good concordance for total hip and femoral neck in men, which needs to be proven. While I think MORES is a good method, I personally did not find it less cumbersome than OST. OST has been used in several populations that the authors do not cite, including African-American men (1), Moroccan men (2), and white men (3) responding to an advertisement or attending an orthopedic clinic. In addition, Zimering (4) has reported that OST worked well in another male veteran population, similar to what we had found previously (5). All screening methods are aimed at identifying men at higher risk for osteoporosis by DXA, and all seem to work reasonably well. Unless the authors calculated the OST score for their population, it is impossible to state that one score truly is better than another.

    References

    1. Sinnott B, Kukreja S, Barengolts E. Utility of screening tools for the prediction of low bone mass in African American men. Osteoporos Int. 2006:17:684-692. 2. Ghazi M, Mounach A, Nouijai A, et al. Performance of the osteoporosis risk assessment tool in Moroccan men. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26:2037-2041. 3. Skedros JG, Sybrowsky CL, Stoddard GJ. The osteoporosis self-assessment tool: a useful tool for the orthopaedic surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:765-772. 4. Zimering MB, Shin JJ, Shah J, et al. Validation of a novel risk estimation tool for predicting low bone density in Caucasian and African American men veterans. J Clin Densitom. 2007;10:289-297. 5. Adler RA, Tran MT, Petkov VI. Performance of the osteoporosis self- assessment tool for osteoporosis in American men. Mayo Clin Proc 2003;78:723-727.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (27 November 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for Screening Osteoporosis Risk
    Screening Osteoporosis Risk
    • Francisco R. Lafita MD, FACP, Cambrils, Baix Camp. Spain
    • Other Contributors:

    Osteoporosis in men constitutes an increasingly important health issue. Risk factors for men’s osteoporosis have been described (1) Simple and effective methods are needed to identify patients at risk for osteoporosis or osteoporosis-related fracture so that they can be screened with dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and switched for treatment. In the last years, different methods of risk assessment have been published (OR...

    Show More

    Osteoporosis in men constitutes an increasingly important health issue. Risk factors for men’s osteoporosis have been described (1) Simple and effective methods are needed to identify patients at risk for osteoporosis or osteoporosis-related fracture so that they can be screened with dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and switched for treatment. In the last years, different methods of risk assessment have been published (ORAI, SCORE, ABONE, OST score…) (2)(3) Recently, Sheperd (4) and al have proposed a new and simple method to screen men at risk for osteoporosis (MORES) which includes three variables (age, weight and history of COPD) finding an excellent predictive validity. However, as the population samples described in this paper were 50 and older other variables, as concomitant diseases (thyroidal, inflammatories, hypogonadism, levels of 25OH-D…), current/past medical therapy known to induce bone loss (a.s. corticosteroids) should have been considered. Moreover, many authors state that in the future biochemical markers of bone resorption may be used clinically to predict fracture risk independent of BMD values. For that reason, determinations of urinary resorption markers (NTx, CTx…) also constitute interesting points to determine risk of loosing bone mass or actual bone resorption (5).

    1. Orwoll ES. Osteoporosis in men. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1998;27:349-672. 2. Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Murray TM, McIsaac WJ, Joseph L, Brown JP. Evaluation of decision rules for referring women for bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. JAMA. 2001;286:57-633 3. Skedros JG, Sybrowsky CL, Stoddard GJ. The osteoporosis self-assessment screening tool: a useful tool for the orthopaedic surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:765-724 4. Angela J. Shepherd, MD, Alvah R. Cass, MD, SM, Carol A. Carlson, BA and Laura Ray, MA Development and Internal Validation of the Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Score. Annals of Family Medicine 5:540-546 (2007) 5. Iki M, Morita A, Ikeda Y, Sato Y, Akiba T, Matsumoto T, et al; JPOS Study Group. Biochemical markers of bone turnover may predict progression to osteoporosis in osteopenic women: the JPOS Cohort Study. J Bone Miner Metab. 2007;25:122-9

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (26 November 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for Osteoporosis in men: a neglected issue
    Osteoporosis in men: a neglected issue
    • Jean-Yves REGINSTER, Li�ge, BELGIUM

    For many years, osteoporosis has been considered as a disease predominantly affecting the women and osteoporosis in males has been subsequently underestimated. Several studies, from various parts of the world have now clearly established that, following their increase in life expectancy, men are also hit by osteoporotic fractures. One Caucasian or Asian man out of five will experience an osteoporotic fracture. Mortality...

    Show More

    For many years, osteoporosis has been considered as a disease predominantly affecting the women and osteoporosis in males has been subsequently underestimated. Several studies, from various parts of the world have now clearly established that, following their increase in life expectancy, men are also hit by osteoporotic fractures. One Caucasian or Asian man out of five will experience an osteoporotic fracture. Mortality and morbidity (loss of independence, disability…) are also higher in males than in females, after a similar fracture. Medications used for the management of osteoporosis in females have (bisphosphonates, teriparatides) or will soon be (strontium ranelate) investigated, for their efficacy and safety in the management of osteoporosis in male subjects. Since the diagnostic procedures (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) are of equal efficacy, in both genders, to identify patients at risk of fracture, any tool that could optimize the cost/benefit ratio of mass screening scenarios, to select individuals who should be referred for confirmatory DXA measurement are scientifically justified. In this perspective, the Shepherd and colleagues’ paper deserves attention. By using simple, easy to get, variables (age, weight and history of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases) they obtain an excellent predictive performance, with, as it is often the case with the use of such indices, is characterized by a much higher sensitivity than specificity. Results obtained in a cohort of males, from the United States, are similar to the results that were previously published, with similar tools, in females, in the US, Europe or Asia. The authors have to be praised for having drawn attention on the problem of male osteoporosis and for having provided primary care physicians with a simple, user- friendly and cheap tool, to help them, in the daily practice, to identify individuals who should be referred to a DXA measurement. This type of study will undoubtedly contribute to improving the management of osteoporosis in males, a disease which deserves the same attention that it receives in females.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 5 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 5 (6)
Vol. 5, Issue 6
1 Nov 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
  • Annual Indexes
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Development and Internal Validation of the Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Score
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Development and Internal Validation of the Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Score
Angela J. Shepherd, Alvah R. Cass, Carol A. Carlson, Laura Ray
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2007, 5 (6) 540-546; DOI: 10.1370/afm.753

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Development and Internal Validation of the Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Score
Angela J. Shepherd, Alvah R. Cass, Carol A. Carlson, Laura Ray
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2007, 5 (6) 540-546; DOI: 10.1370/afm.753
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Comparison of the Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Score (MORES) With FRAX in Identifying Men at Risk for Osteoporosis
  • Validation of the Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Score (MORES) in a Primary Care Setting
  • Determining Risk of Vertebral Osteoporosis in Men: Validation of the Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Score
  • Current status of research on osteoporosis in COPD: a systematic review
  • ASHP Therapeutic Position Statement on the Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis in Adults
  • In This Issue: Equity Global Theme Issue on Poverty and Human Development
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Joint Display of Integrated Data Collection for Mixed Methods Research: An Illustration From a Pediatric Oncology Quality Improvement Study
  • Patient-Guided Tours: A Patient-Centered Methodology to Understand Patient Experiences of Health Care
  • Putting Evidence Into Practice: An Update on the US Preventive Services Task Force Methods for Developing Recommendations for Preventive Services
Show more Methodology

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
    • Prevention
  • Person groups:
    • Older adults
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine