Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleSystematic ReviewsA

A Meta-Analysis of Pedometer-Based Walking Interventions and Weight Loss

Caroline R. Richardson, Tiffany L. Newton, Jobby J. Abraham, Ananda Sen, Masahito Jimbo and Ann M. Swartz
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2008, 6 (1) 69-77; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.761
Caroline R. Richardson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tiffany L. Newton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jobby J. Abraham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ananda Sen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masahito Jimbo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann M. Swartz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.
  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Funnel plot test to test for publication bias. No evidence of publication bias was found.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Forest plot of effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals for all 9 cohorts, based on the random effects meta-analysis results.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Weight change by study intervention duration.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Published Studies of Pedometer-Based Walking Interventions That Met Inclusion Criteria

    Study (Year)No. of Participantsa (Study Design)PopulationDropout No. (%)Weight-Related Inclusion CriteriaBaseline BMI Mean ± SD (Range), kg/m2Intervention DurationBehavioral CounselingGoal Setting in Pedometer InterventionStep-Count Logging and Reporting
    BMI = body mass index; RCT = randomized controlled trial.
    a Number represents only study completers and, for RCTs, only participants randomized to the pedometer intervention arm of the study.
    b Calculation was based on other data in the report.
    Engel and Lindner18 (2006)22 (RCT)Sedentary men and women with type 2 diabetes with a mean age of 60.5 years2 (8)None32.7 ± 5.56 monthsIntensive coaching program including 6 individual sessions and a monthly newsletterStep-count walking goals chosen by the participantTime spent walking and step counts were recorded in a glucose and exercise log
    Wilson et al19 (2005)22 (Cohort)African American breast cancer survivors with a mean age of 55 years2 (8)None32.7 (25.2–47.2)8 weeksEight 75-minute small group weekly sessions based on Health Belief ModelAssigned progressive step goalsWalks were scheduled and steps were recorded on a scheduler/tracker form and reported to study staff weekly
    Miyatake et al20 (2002)31 (Cohort)Japanese men aged 32 to 59 yearsNot reportedBMI >25 kg/m228.6 ± 2.21 yearNot reportedIncrease daily baseline step count by 1,000 stepsNot reported
    Schneider et al21 (2006)38 (Cohort)Sedentary overweight or obese but otherwise healthy adults aged 30 to 60 years18 (32)BMI >25 kg/m233.5 ± 5.036 weeksInformation sessions every other week for 2 months, then once a monthGradually increase daily step count to 10,000 steps/daySteps were recorded daily in an activity log
    Tudor-Locke et al22 (2004)24 (RCT)Overweight or obese, sedentary individuals with type 2 diabetes and a mean age of 52.7 years6 (20)None34.1 ± 6.116 weeksCounseling based on self-efficacy and social support; 4 weekly group meetings and a program manualIndividualized step-count goal setting based on exercises in the manualSteps per day were recorded in a calendar log
    Swartz et al23 (2003)18 (Cohort)Overweight or obese women with family history of type 2 diabetes1 (5)BMI >25 kg/m235.0 ± 5.18 weeksPedometer and step-count goal instructions onlyAccumulate 10,000 steps/daySteps and exercise were recorded in an activity log
    Moreau et al24 (2001)15 (RCT)Sedentary, postmenopausal women with stage 1 hypertension and a mean age of 54 yearsNot reportedNone>25b24 weeksPedometer and step-count goal instructions onlyStep-count goals gradually increased to a target of 3 km over baselineDaily step counts were recorded on log sheets that were collected every 2 weeks
    Hultquist et al25 (2005)31 (RCT)Sedentary, healthy, nonsmoking women aged 33 to 55 years0 (0)BMI <40 kg/m230 ± 6.44 weeksPedometer and step-count goal instructions only10,000 daily stepsStep counts were recorded on a pedometer with a 7-day memory and collected weekly
    Chan et al26 (2004)106 (Cohort)Sedentary workers with a mean age of 43 years71 (40)None29.5 ± 5.912 weeksCounseling based on self-efficacy and social support; 4 weekly group meetingsIndividualized goal settingStep-count goals and tracking were logged on a Web site
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Step Count and Weight Change Data From Studies That Met Inclusion Criteria

    Step CountWeight, kg
    Study (Year)PreinterventionPostinterventionChangePreinterventionPostinterventionChange
    NR = not reported in the study report.
    Note: Preintervention and postintervention values are expressed as means or as means ± standard deviations, except as indicated below.
    a Calculation was based on other data in the study report.
    b Difference between the preintervention and postintervention values was significant at the .05 level.
    c Means ± standard errors.
    Engel and Lindner18 (2006)NR7,296±2,066NR91.9±18.489.8a−2.1a
    Wilson et al19 (2005)4,7918,297a3,50686.785.8−0.9b
    Miyatake et al20 (2002)7,013±3,0778,840±4,3421,82782.3±7.478.6±7.4−3.7b
    Schneider et al21 (2006)5,123±1,2719,117±1,6973,99498.8±18.696.4±17.8−2.4b
    Tudor-Locke et al22 (2004)5,753a9,123±4,5393,37096.8±23.996.1±22.8−0.7
    Swartz et al23 (2003)4,972±419c9,213±362c4,24194.0±3.694.3±3.4c+0.3
    Moreau et al24 (2001)5,400±500c9,700±400c4,30081.1±5.979.8±5.8−1.3b
    Hultquist et al25 (2005)5,603±1,21410,159±292c4,55682.0±3.1c81.5±3.1c−0.5
    Chan et al26 (2004)7,029±3,10010,480±3,2243,45179.4±17.377.9a−1.5a,b

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    A Meta-Analysis of Pedometer-Based Walking Interventions and Weight Loss

    Caroline R. Richardson, MD , and colleagues

    Background People who walk more tend to be thinner than those who walk less. This study examines the effects of walking programs for overweight adults that use pedometers (small devices worn at the waist that count every step taken during the day).

    What This Study Found Walking programs that use a pedometer as a motivational tool result in a moderate amount of weight loss in overweight or obese sedentary adults. The average participant in a pedometer-based walking program without dietary change can expect to lose about 1 pound every 10 weeks, or about 5 pounds per year. Longer programs are associated with greater weight loss.

    Implications

    • The amount of weight loss from pedometer-based walking programs is small but significant from a clinical perspective.
    • Walking programs that use pedometers can have health benefits that are associated with both a modest weight loss and increased physical activity.
  • Annals Journal Club Selection

    Jan/Feb 2008

    The Annals Journal Club is designed to encourage a learning community of those seeking to improve health care and health through enhanced primary care. Additional information is available on the Journal Club home page.

    The Annals of Family Medicine encourages readers to develop the learning community of those seeking to improve health care and health through enhanced primary care. You can participate by conducting a RADICAL journal club, and sharing the results of your discussions in the Annals online discussion for the featured articles. RADICAL is an acronym for: Read, Ask, Discuss, Inquire, Collaborate, Act, and Learn. The word radical also indicates the need to engage diverse participants in thinking critically about important issues affecting primary care, and then acting on those discussions.1

    Article for Discussion

    • Richardson CR, Newton TL, Abraham JJ, Sen A, Jimbo M, Swartz AM. A Meta-Analysis of Pedometer-Based Walking Interventions and Weight Loss.Ann Fam Med. 2008;6:69-77.

    Discussion Tips

    The following article provides helpful background information on meta-analyses. It is available at http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/315/7121/1533. Egger M. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ.1997;315(6):1533-1537.

    Discussion Questions

    • What questions are addressed by the article? Why do they matter?
    • Is a meta-analysis a reasonable way to answer the research questions? Why?
    • What are the main findings?
    • To what degree can the findings be accounted for by:
      1. How studies were selected (inclusion criteria and search strategy)?
      2. How data were extracted from the parent studies for analysis?
      3. Limitations in the original studies or their reporting of key information?
      4. Confounding (false attribution of causality because 2 variables discovered to be associated actually are associated with a 3rd factor)?
      5. Publication bias (that is, positive studies being more likely to be published)?
      6. Chance?

    Reference

    1. Stange KC, Miller WL, McLellan LA, et al. Annals journal club: It�s time to get RADICAL. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4:196-197. Available at: http://annfammed.org/cgi/content/full/4/3/196.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 6 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 6 (1)
Vol. 6, Issue 1
1 Jan 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Meta-Analysis of Pedometer-Based Walking Interventions and Weight Loss
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A Meta-Analysis of Pedometer-Based Walking Interventions and Weight Loss
Caroline R. Richardson, Tiffany L. Newton, Jobby J. Abraham, Ananda Sen, Masahito Jimbo, Ann M. Swartz
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2008, 6 (1) 69-77; DOI: 10.1370/afm.761

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
A Meta-Analysis of Pedometer-Based Walking Interventions and Weight Loss
Caroline R. Richardson, Tiffany L. Newton, Jobby J. Abraham, Ananda Sen, Masahito Jimbo, Ann M. Swartz
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2008, 6 (1) 69-77; DOI: 10.1370/afm.761
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Association between work schedules and motivation for lifestyle change in workers with overweight or obesity: a cross-sectional study in Japan
  • Objectively Measured Physical Activity in Older Adults With and Without Diabetes
  • Feasibility of a real-time self-monitoring device for sitting less and moving more: a randomised controlled trial
  • Effect of exercise training on C reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials
  • Prescribing exercise to help your patients lose weight
  • Is there evidence that walking groups have health benefits? A systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Steps to a better Belfast: physical activity assessment and promotion in primary care
  • Clinical use of objective measures of physical activity
  • A Life-Style Physical Activity Intervention and the Antibody Response to Pneumococcal Vaccination in Women
  • Motivating patients to activity: A light at the end of the couch?
  • Weight-management interventions in primary care: a pilot randomised controlled trial
  • Physical Activity and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: Proposed Biologic Mechanisms and Areas for Future Research
  • Annals Journal Club: Pedometers for Promoting Walking and Weight Loss
  • In This Issue: Mental Health and Care Management, Health Behavior Change, and Reflection in Primary Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing Among Older Persons: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
  • Accuracy of Signs and Symptoms for the Diagnosis of Acute Rhinosinusitis and Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis
  • Employment Interventions in Health Settings: A Systematic Review and Synthesis
Show more Systematic Reviews

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Health promotion
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine