Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleAnnals Journal Club

Annals Journal Club: Symbiosis Instead of Competing Demands: A Tale of Two Preventive Services

The Annals of Family Medicine January 2009, 7 (1) iii; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.950
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The Annals of Family Medicine encourages readers to develop a learning community of those seeking to improve health care and health through enhanced primary care. You can participate by conducting a RADICAL journal club and sharing the results of your discussions in the Annals online discussion for the featured articles. RADICAL is an acronym for Read, Ask, Discuss, Inquire, Collaborate, Act, and Learn. The word radical also indicates the need to engage diverse participants in thinking critically about important issues affecting primary care and then acting on those discussions.1

HOW IT WORKS

In each issue, the Annals selects an article or articles and provides discussion tips and questions. We encourage you to take a RADICAL approach to these materials and to post a summary of your conversation in our online discussion. (Open the article online and click on “TRACK Comments: Submit a response.”) You can find discussion questions and more information online at: http://www.AnnFamMed.org/AJC/.

CURRENT SELECTION

Article for Discussion

Potter MP, Phengrasamy L, Hudes ES, McPhee SJ, Walsh JME. Offering home fecal occult blood tests at 3 u shot clinics increases colorectal cancer screening rates. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(1):17–23.OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

DISCUSSION TIPS

This clinical trial shows a dramatic effect of adding fecal occult blood testing to fl u shot clinics. In addition to critiquing the article, it may be worthwhile to consider how the findings might be reinvented in your practice setting.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

  • What question is addressed by the article? How does the question fit with what already is known on this topic?

  • How does theory inform the intervention design?

  • How strong is the study design for answering the question?

  • How do the study methods compare with the CONSORT criteria for clinical trials?2 What adjustments in the criteria are necessitated by the randomization of clinic days rather than individuals?

  • What is the degree to which can the findings be accounted for by:

    1. How participants were selected? The exclusion criteria and drop outs? Are any biases likely to be important?

    2. How outcomes were measured?

    3. Confounding (false attribution of causality because 2 variables discovered to be associated actually are associated with a 3rd factor)?

    4. How information was interpreted?

    5. Chance?

  • What are the main findings? How large is the effect?

  • What do we learn from the secondary analyses of factors associated with variations in screening completion, and from the description of attempts to follow up patients with positive fecal occult blood tests? What factors affect interpretation of these findings that are less an issue with interpreting the main effects of the clinical trial?

  • How transportable are the findings to your clinical setting? What factors might affect this transportability?

  • What are some next steps for applying the findings or answering other questions that this study raises?

  • © 2009 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Stange KC, Miller WL, McLellan LA, et al. Annals Journal Club: It’s time to get RADICAL. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4(3):196–197. http://annfammed.org/cgi/content/full/4/3/196.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    CONSORT Group. CONSORT: Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials. http://www.consort-statement.org/. Accessed Oct 26, 2008.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 7 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 7 (1)
Vol. 7, Issue 1
1 Jan 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Annals Journal Club: Symbiosis Instead of Competing Demands: A Tale of Two Preventive Services
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Annals Journal Club: Symbiosis Instead of Competing Demands: A Tale of Two Preventive Services
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2009, 7 (1) iii; DOI: 10.1370/afm.950

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Annals Journal Club: Symbiosis Instead of Competing Demands: A Tale of Two Preventive Services
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2009, 7 (1) iii; DOI: 10.1370/afm.950
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • HOW IT WORKS
    • CURRENT SELECTION
    • DISCUSSION TIPS
    • DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Organizing Health Care for Value
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Nurse Navigator for Lung Cancer Screening
  • Self-Rooming Patients in Health System?
  • Continuity of Care as a Quality Metric
Show more Annals Journal Club

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine