Article Figures & Data
Tables
Condition CHAT- Positive Cases Reference Standard Case Criteria Reference Standard–Positive Cases % (n/N)a A=anxiety score; CHAT=Case-finding and Help Assessment Tool; PA = physical aggression scale; VA = verbal aggression scale. a No. of cases/No. responding. Nicotine dependency 38 Heavy Smoking Index (HSI)9 >2 6.8 (51/755) Problematic drinking 67 Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)10 >7 11.3 (84/746) Problematic drug use 9 Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST)11 >5 1.9 (14/750) Problematic gambling 4 South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)12 ≥4 0.7 (5/688) Major depression 30 Patient Health Questionnaire – Depression (PHQ-9)13 ≥15 4.1 (30/737) Anxiety 58 Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale (HADS)14 A >10 9.3 (68/728) Being verbally abused 8 Conflict Tactic Scale 1 (CTS-1)15 VA ≥15 2 (12/688) Being physically abused 1 Conflict Tactic Scale 1 (CTS-1)15 PA ≥24 0.3 (2/594) Being verbally angry 10 Conflict Tactic Scale 1 (CTS-1)15 VA ≥15 2.2 (13/594) Being physically angry 1 Conflict Tactic Scale 1 (CTS-1)15 PA ≥24 0.3 (2/594) Condition Positive Cases No. Wanting Help No. (%) Wanting Help Not Today No. (%) Wanting Help Today No. (%) CHAT=Case-finding and Help Assessment Tool. Nicotine dependency 51 23 (45) 18 (35) 5 (10) Problematic drinking 84 9 (11) 5 (6) 4 (5) Problematic drug use 14 3 (21) 2 (14) 1 (7) Problematic gambling 5 1 (20) 1 (20) 0 (0) Major depression 30 17 (57) 11 (37) 6 (20) Anxiety 68 27 (40) 12 (18) 15 (26) Being verbally abused 14 2 (14) 1 (7) 1 (7) Being verbally angry 13 4 (31) 3 (23) 1 (8) Condition % Sensitivity (95% CI) Positive CHAT Responses/ Positive Reference Standard % Specificity (95% CI) Negative CHAT Responses/ Negative Reference Standard CHAT=Case-finding and Help Assessment Tool; CI = confidence interval. Nicotine dependency 88 (77–95) 38/51 91 (89–93) 61/704 Problematic drinking 80 (70–87) 67/84 85 (82–87) 101/662 Problematic drug use 64 (39–84) 9/14 98 (97–99) 3/736 Problematic gambling 80 (38–99) 4/5 98 (97–99) 13/683 Major depression 98 (86–100) 30/30 73 (70–76) 191/707 Anxiety 85 (75–92) 58/68 77 (73–80) 155/660 Being verbally abused 57 (33–79) 8/14 97 (96–98) 16/580 Being verbally angry 77 (50–92) 10/13 92 (89–94) 47/581 Condition Specificity No Help Question % (95% CI) Specificity With Help Question % (95% CI) CHAT=Case-finding and Help Assessment Tool; CI = confidence interval. Nicotine dependency 91 (89–93) 99 (98–99) Problematic drinking 85 (82–87) 99 (99–100) Problematic drug use 98 (97–99) 99 (99–100) Problematic gambling 98 (97–99) 99 (99–100) Major depression 73 (70–76) 98 (97–99) Anxiety 77 (73–80) 99 (98–100) Being verbally abused 97 (96–98) 99 (98–100) Being physically abused 94 (92–95) 99 (98–100) Being verbally angry 92 (89–94) 99 (98–100) Being physically angry 91 (88–93) 99 (98–100) - Table 5.
Effect of Help Question on Likelihood Ratio of Being CHAT Positive for Common Conditions
Positive Condition Help Today LR (95% CI) Help But Not Today LR (95% CI) Not Requesting Help LR (95% CI) Help Requested (Either Today or Later) LR (95% CI) CHAT=Case-finding and Help Assessment Tool; CI = confidence interval; LR = likelihood ratio. Nicotine dependency 11.5 (3.6–36.4) 10.4 (6.0–17.4) 0.6 (0.5–0.7) 10.6 (6.7–16.8) Problematic drinking 70.2 (3.8–1,292.6) 6.6 (2.0–21.0) 0.9 (0.8–1.0) 11.8 (4.3–32.4) Major depression 21.6 (10.4–45.0) 5.2 (2.3–11.7) 0.5 (0.3–0.7) 10.3 (6.6–15.9) Anxiety 18.2 (8.0–41.0) 5.8 (3.0–11.4) 0.6 (0.5–0.8) 9.4 (5.9–14.9)
Additional Files
Supplemental Appendix
Supplemental Appendix. Lifestyle Assessment Form
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Supplemental data: Appendix - PDF file, 2 pages, 130 KB
The Article in Brief
Asking for Help Is Helpful: Validation of a Brief Lifestyle and Mood Assessment Tool in Primary Health Care
Felicity Goodyear-Smith , and colleagues
Background The CHAT is a simple tool to help identify risky health behaviors, such as inactivity and drug use, and mental health issues, such as depression, stress, or anger problems. For each of these issues, patients are asked whether they would like help with the problem. This study evaluates the benefit of asking patients whether they would like help.
What This Study Found Asking patients whether they would like help with the issues on the CHAT reduces false-positive results; people who have a positive CHAT question score and indicate they would like help with the issue are very likely to have the condition being assessed. Using the help question reduces the amount of time doctors spend during patient visits determining which patients require immediate help with particular issues.
Implications
- The CHAT's help question allows patients with multiple conditions to prioritize issues they want to address, indicates their readiness to change, and promotes self-determination. It helps clinicians decide which topics to pursue with patients.