Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleMethodology

Combining Web-Based and Mail Surveys Improves Response Rates: A PBRN Study From PRIME Net

Philip J. Kroth, Laurie McPherson, Robert Leverence, Wilson Pace, Elvan Daniels, Robert L. Rhyne, Robert L. Williams and ; For The Prime Net Consortium
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2009, 7 (3) 245-248; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.944
Philip J. Kroth
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurie McPherson
MSCIS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Leverence
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wilson Pace
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elvan Daniels
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert L. Rhyne
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert L. Williams
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

PURPOSE The advent of Web-based survey tools has provided the investigator with an alternative to paper-based survey methods that in many instances may be less expensive to implement than traditional paper-based surveys. Newer technology, however, does not diminish the importance of obtaining an adequate response rate.

METHODS We analyzed response rate data obtained from a survey implemented across 3 practice-based research networks (PBRNs) in which the survey was first implemented electronically with 5 rounds of electronic solicitation for an Internet-based questionnaire and then by 2 rounds of a paper-based version mailed only to nonresponders.

RESULTS Overall, 24% of the total survey responses received were in the paper mode despite intense promotion of the survey in the electronic phase.

CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest there is still an important role for the use of paper-based methods in PBRN survey research. Both hard copy and electronic survey collection methods may be required to enhance clinician response rates in PBRNs.

  • Data collection
  • paper
  • questionnaires
  • attitude of health personnel
  • attitude to computers
  • electronic mail
  • time factors
  • user-computer interface
  • computer communication networks
  • health surveys
  • postal service
  • health care surveys/methods
  • Received for publication March 6, 2008.
  • Revision received August 4, 2008.
  • Accepted for publication August 11, 2008.
  • © 2009 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 7 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 7 (3)
Vol. 7, Issue 3
1 May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Combining Web-Based and Mail Surveys Improves Response Rates: A PBRN Study From PRIME Net
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Combining Web-Based and Mail Surveys Improves Response Rates: A PBRN Study From PRIME Net
Philip J. Kroth, Laurie McPherson, Robert Leverence, Wilson Pace, Elvan Daniels, Robert L. Rhyne, Robert L. Williams
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2009, 7 (3) 245-248; DOI: 10.1370/afm.944

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Combining Web-Based and Mail Surveys Improves Response Rates: A PBRN Study From PRIME Net
Philip J. Kroth, Laurie McPherson, Robert Leverence, Wilson Pace, Elvan Daniels, Robert L. Rhyne, Robert L. Williams
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2009, 7 (3) 245-248; DOI: 10.1370/afm.944
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cultivating a Cycle of Trust With Diverse Communities in Practice-Based Research: A Report From PRIME Net
  • Referral Practices of Oncologists to Specialized Palliative Care
  • Primary Care Providers' Needs and Preferences for Information about Colorectal Cancer Survivorship Care
  • Decision-making in lumbar spinal stenosis: A survey on the influence of the morphology of the dural sac
  • Recruiting Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) Physicians to Be Research Participants: Lessons Learned From the North Texas (NorTex) Needs Assessment Study
  • The Influence of Research Compensation Options on Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) Physician Participation: A North Texas (NorTex) PBRN Study
  • Context of Clinical Care: The Case of Hepatitis C in Underserved Communities--A Report from the Primary Care Multiethnic Network (PRIME Net) Consortium
  • In This Issue: The Science, Art, and Policy of Primary Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Joint Display of Integrated Data Collection for Mixed Methods Research: An Illustration From a Pediatric Oncology Quality Improvement Study
  • Patient-Guided Tours: A Patient-Centered Methodology to Understand Patient Experiences of Health Care
  • Putting Evidence Into Practice: An Update on the US Preventive Services Task Force Methods for Developing Recommendations for Preventive Services
Show more Methodology

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • PBRN research

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine