Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief
    • Past Issues in Brief
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
    • Associate Editor Opening
    • Current Opportunities
    • Job Board
  • COVID-19
    • Preprint Collection
    • Casenotes Blog

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief
    • Past Issues in Brief
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
    • Associate Editor Opening
    • Current Opportunities
    • Job Board
  • COVID-19
    • Preprint Collection
    • Casenotes Blog
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
NewsFamily Medicine UpdatesF

Innovation in Family Medicine Residencies: Struggling to Create Classics for the Future

Joseph Gravel, Todd Shaffer, Stoney Abercrombie, Karen Hall, Grant Hoekzema, Stanley Kozakowski, Michael Mazzone, Benjamin Schneider and Martin Wieschhaus
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2011, 9 (3) 275-276; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1273
Joseph Gravel Jr.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Todd Shaffer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stoney Abercrombie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen Hall
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Grant Hoekzema
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stanley Kozakowski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Mazzone
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Schneider
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Wieschhaus
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

“Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower.” Steve Jobs “Innovation! One cannot be forever innovating. I want to create classics.” Coco Chanel

Program directors work each day to produce graduates prepared for future practice yet rooted in the ideals and values of the classic family medicine past. Residency programs are currently engaged in a dramatic outburst of activity in new curricular models as well as practice transformation directly involving residents, most commonly using the PCMH model. Students and residents show great enthusiasm for this new model which provides them a possible path out of a “hamster care” future as health care payment models begin to move away from a fee-for-service methodology.

The AFMRD Board of Directors considers the “support and spread of innovation in family medicine residency education” as a major component of its 2011 strategic plan. Defining “innovation” can be a challenge. Does it actually enhance residency recruitment, provide better service for patients, deliver better quality, or ensure our graduates can deliver the new models of care? Is it disruptive or incremental? Will “innovative” ideas actually result in a better family physician? How will we know?

Working with other family medicine organizations through the Council for Academic Family Medicine (CAFM), the AFMRD has developed an “Innovation Needs Assessment Task Force” to create and administer a needs assessment inventory. The task force‘s gap analysis of the current mechanisms to support mutual assistance and shared learning across multiple residency sites will help identify a strategy to measure and track the scope of innovation in the nation’s residencies and family medicine departments. The task force will also create a communications strategy to disseminate the scope and impact of family medicine innovation to students, policy makers, and the public.

The AFMRD efforts in promoting innovation include enhancing inter-program collaborative efforts and providing program director input for the revision of RC-FM requirements that would more easily allow for innovative training. In addition, the development of Web-based platforms has been shown to be an effective means of supporting innovation and outcomes. TransforMED has created Delta Exchange, an interactive, asynchronous tool to share what’s being learned and to engage other innovators. The AFMRD worked to secure free access to this for our members (http://www.transformed.com) to further enhance conversations about transformation and take advantage of this next generation interactive tool.

Is there funding out there to support innovation? The donations of $30 million by an anonymous donor to Harvard Medical School and another $20 million to Boston’s Partners Healthcare for the express purpose of supporting innovation in primary care tell us yes. Since these donations went to 2 institutions that do not formally even acknowledge the specialty of family medicine (no clinical or academic department in either one) suggests that the builders of the old medical-industrial complex still hold sway in the psyche of many of our nation’s power brokers. FM residencies need to become a network of “innovation exemplars” and better communicate these examples to those outside the discipline which may assist us in attracting more financial support.

What about upcoming ACGME revisions to the program requirements? Will barriers to residency innovation be reduced? We think the answer is yes, but with a caveat. The freedom of having reduced prescriptive, time-based, check-off requirements creates more space for innovative ways to train residents, but the burden of proving actual outcome competency measures is also more present. External accountability of our graduates will also inevitably increase. We believe that the growing ability to measure clinical outcomes is an opportunity to more clearly demonstrate that family physicians are this nation’s best hope to create a higher quality, lower cost health care system, but we must provide residents new skills to lead PCMHs and ACOs. Innovation, new ways of looking at and solving problems, therefore, is an imperative for our specialty. We may need to look outside medicine to find ideas and solutions from other business industries to improve our model of delivery of care.

We have over 450 federally funded test sites called family medicine residencies which are a ready-built system to test new ideas to train better primary care physicians and provide better health outcomes than anyone else. If we don’t, others will; and those others may not have the values of the family physicians of the past that inspire us to create “classics” for the future.

  • © 2011 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 9 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine
Vol. 9, Issue 3
1 May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Innovation in Family Medicine Residencies: Struggling to Create Classics for the Future
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Innovation in Family Medicine Residencies: Struggling to Create Classics for the Future
Joseph Gravel, Todd Shaffer, Stoney Abercrombie, Karen Hall, Grant Hoekzema, Stanley Kozakowski, Michael Mazzone, Benjamin Schneider, Martin Wieschhaus
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2011, 9 (3) 275-276; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1273

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Innovation in Family Medicine Residencies: Struggling to Create Classics for the Future
Joseph Gravel, Todd Shaffer, Stoney Abercrombie, Karen Hall, Grant Hoekzema, Stanley Kozakowski, Michael Mazzone, Benjamin Schneider, Martin Wieschhaus
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2011, 9 (3) 275-276; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1273
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • EMPOWERING FAMILY PHYSICIANS TO DRIVE CHANGE IN PRACTICE: PLANS FOR THE ABFM NATIONAL JOURNAL CLUB
  • ONGOING CONSIDERATION OF GROWING THE LEADERSHIP FOR THE DISCIPLINE
  • Could Trusting Your Doctor Impact Your Health in America?
Show more Family Medicine Updates

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Online First

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2021 Annals of Family Medicine